Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 495–502 | Cite as

Hyperosmolarity and acidosis in diabetes mellitus

A three-year experience in Rhode Island
  • Tom J. Wachtel
  • Linda M. Tetu-Mouradjian
  • Dona L. Goldman
  • Susan E. Ellis
  • Patricia S. O’Sullivan
Original Articles

Abstract

Objectives:Diabetic acidosis (DA) and the diabetic hyperosmolar state (DHS) are generally considered to be two distinct clinical entities. However, clinical experience and the literature suggest that there may be some overlap. The purposes of this study were 1) to establish the proportion of overlap cases, 2) to identify any occurrence of DHS in diabetic patients under the age of 30 years (likely type I) and any occurrence of DA in diabetic patients over the age of 60 years (likely type II), 3) to describe clinical factors associated with the development of DA and DHS, and 4) to identify factors that influence the prognosis of DHS.

Patients and methods:613 cases were identified by retrospective chart review, using discharge information from all 15 Rhode Island community hospitals during 1986, 1987, and part of 1988. DA alone [serum glucose (glu)>300 mg/dL, bicarbonate (HCO 3)<15mEq/L,calculated total serum osmolarity (osm)≤320 mOsm/L] was the diagnosis for 134 subjects (22%), DHS alone (glu>600 mg/dL, HCO 3 ≥15 mEq/L, osm>320 mOsm/L), for 278 subjects (45%), and a mixed case (glu>600 mg/dL, HCO 3<15mEq/L, osm>320 mOsm/L), for 200 subjects (33%). Information about serum or urinary ketones was available for 109 subjects who had DA alone [103 bad diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)] and 144 subjects who had mixed DA and DHS (131 had mixed DKA and DHS). All the data were also analyzed using the effective osmolarity and a cutoff of 310 mOsm/L for this alternative case definition.

Results:Patients with DA alone were younger (mean age 33 years) and patients with DHS alone were older (mean age 63 years). However, 28 (10%) of the 278 cases of DHS alone and 72 (36%) of the 200 cases of mixed DA and DHS occurred in patients under the age of 30. Eighteen cases (13%) of DA alone and 62 cases (31%) of mixed DA and DHS occurred in patients over the age of 60. The results were not substantially changed when effective osmolarity >310 mOsm/L was used to define hyperosmolarity and when only cases with documented DKA were included. An infection was the most common precipitating factor of DA (30%), DHS (27%), and mixed cases (32%). Other common associated factors included noncompliance with treatment (20% for DA, 12% for DHS, and 22% for mixed cases) and previously undiagnosed diabetes (24% for DA, 18% for DHS, and 10% for mixed cases). Nursing home residents accounted for 0.7% of DA cases, 18% of DHS cases, and 4.5% of mixed cases. Mortality was 4% for DA, 12% for DHS, and 9% for mixed cases. The mortality for DHS is the lowest reported in the literature, continuing a downward trend that began in the 1970s. Nonsurvival was associated with older age, higher osmolarity, and nursing home residence. Survival was associated with the presence of an infection.

Conclusions:1) many patients experience mixed DA (DKA) and DHS rather than either condition alone, 2) both DA (DKA) and DHS occur in young and old diabetic persons, 3) infection is the most common predisposing factor for either condition, and 4) higher osmolarity, older age, and nursing home residence are associated with nonsurvival in DHS.

Key words

diabetes mellitus acidosis hyperosmolarity infection compliance nursing homes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Diabetes Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carroll P, Matz R. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus in adults: experience in treating diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar nonketotic coma with low-dose insulin and a uniform treatment regimen. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:579–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arieff AI, Carroll HJ. Nonketotic hyperosmolar coma with hyperglycemia: clinical features, pathophysiology, renal function, acid-base balance, plasma — cerebrospinal fluid equilibria and the effects of therapy in 37 cases. Medicine. 1972;51:73–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wachtel TJ, Silliman RA, Lamberton P. Predisposing factors for the diabetic hyperosmolar state. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:499–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fulop M, Tannenbaum H, Dreyer N. Ketotic hyperosmolar coma. Lancet. 1973. 1973;2:635–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foster D. Diabetes mellitus. In: Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, Petersdorf R, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci A, eds. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987; 1778.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCurdy D. Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic diabetic coma. Med Clin North Am. 1970;54:683–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips PA, Rolls BJ, Ledingham JGG, et al. Reduced thirst after water deprivation in healthy elderly men. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:753–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerich JE, Penhos JC, Gutman RA, Recant L. Effect of dehydration and hyperosmolarity on glucose, free fatty acid and ketone body metabolism in the rat. Diabetes. 1973;22:264–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davidson M. Hyperosmolar nonketotic coma. In: Diabetes mellitus: diagnosis and treatment. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986;265–73.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerich JE, Martin MM, Recant L. Clinical and metabolic characteristics of hyperosmolar nonketotic coma. Diabetes. 1971;20:228–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podolsky S. Hyperosmolar nonketotic coma. In: Rifkin H, Raskin P, eds. Diabetes mellitus, volume V. Bowie, MD: Robert J. Brady/Prentice-Hall, 1981;195–201.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faich GA, Fishbein HA, Ellis SE. The epidemiology of diabetic acidosis: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:551–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gordon EE, Kabadi EM. The hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome. Am J Med Sci 1976;271:252–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keller U, Berger W, Ritz R, Truog P. Course and prognosis of 86 episodes of diabetic coma. Diabetologia. 1975;11:93–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orland MJ, Saltman RJ. Type II and other diabetes mellitus. In: Manual of medical therapeutics. 25th ed. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1986;327.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Himmelstein DU, Jones AA, Woolhandler S. Hypernatremic dehydration in nursing home patients: an indicator of neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983;31:466–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spagnoli A, Ostino G, Borga AD, et al. Drug compliance and unreported drugs in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;7:619–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fulop M, Rosenblatt A, Kreitzer S, Gerstenhaber B. Hyperosmolar nature of diabetic coma. Diabetes. 1975;24:594–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sament S, Schwartz MB. Severe diabetic stupor without ketosis. S Afr Med J. 1957;31:893–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wachtel TJ, Silliman RA, Lamberton P. Prognostic factors in the diabetic hyperosmolar state. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;35:737–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom J. Wachtel
    • 1
  • Linda M. Tetu-Mouradjian
  • Dona L. Goldman
  • Susan E. Ellis
  • Patricia S. O’Sullivan
  1. 1.Division of General Internal MedicineRhode Island HospitalProvidence

Personalised recommendations