Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 424–429 | Cite as

Physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems on general medical services

  • Robert M. Walker
  • Steven H. Miles
  • Carol B. Stocking
  • Mark Siegler
Original Articles


Objective:To understand the kinds of clinical situations physicians and nurses regard as “ethics problems.”

Design:The authors prospectively studied physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems using paired interviews. Individual interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses as they cared for the same patients during a six-week period. Each was asked whether any ethics problems had arisen in the care of his or her patients and, if so, to give a brief description of each problem.

Setting:Three general medical services in a 497-bed community teaching hospital.

Participants:13 physicians (mostly family medicine residents) and 42 nurses caring for 142 patients.

Main results:The physicians and nurses thought ethics problems were present in 75 of the 142 patient cases. Physicians and nurses identified ethics problems with similar frequencies; however, they often identified ethics problems in different patient cases or identified different ethics problems in the same case. Physicians and nurses described a variety of problem types. Physicians identified more problems related to quality of life, inappropriate hospital admissions, and cost of care; nurses identified more problems related to patient preferences, family wishes, pain management, implementing treatments, and discharge planning. A fourth of the ethics problems identified by physicians and nurses involved interstaff conflicts.

Conclusions:The physicians and nurses studied considered a broad range of clinical situations to be “ethics problems,” and they perceived them to occur frequently. Systematic differences were found between physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems, and many ethics problems generated interstaff conflicts. Incorporating this kind of information into clinical ethics education programs, and into hospital policies, may represent a useful approach toward improving physician—nurse interaction.

Key words

ethics, medical ethics, nursing interprofessional relations physician—nurse interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Miles SH, Lane LW, Bickel J, Walker RM, Cassel CK. Medical ethics education: coming of age. Acad Med. 1989;64:705–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lo B, Schroeder SA. Frequency of ethical dilemmas in a medical inpatient service. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:1062–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis AJ. Ethical dilemmas: a survey. The Canadian Nurse. 1988;84:56–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gramelspacher GP, Howell JD, Young MJ. Perceptions of ethical problems by nurses and doctors. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:577–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prescott PA, Bowen SA. Physician—nurse relationships. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:127–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosk CL. Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegler M. A legacy of Osler: teaching clinical ethics at the bedside. JAMA. 1978;239:951–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hastings Center. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Briarcliff manor, NY: Hastings Center, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winkenwerder W. Ethical dilemmas for housestaff physicians: the care of critically ill and dying patients. JAMA. 1985;254:3454–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Black PM. Moral disagreements during residency training. JAMA. 1985;254:3467–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stein LI, Watts DT, Howell T. The doctor—nurse game revisited. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:546–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Nurses Association. The code for nurses with interpretive statements. Kansas City, MO American Nurses Association, 1976;1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pearlman RA, Jonsen A. The use of quality-of-life considerations in medical decision making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:344–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients. J Gerontol. 1988;43:M25–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Starr TJ, Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life and resuscitation decisions in elderly patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:373–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisenberg JM. Doctors’ decisions and the cost of medical care. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Health Administration Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Winslow G. Triage and justice: the ethics of rationing life saving medical resources. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evans AL, Brody BA. The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals. JAMA. 1985;253:2236–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bedell SE, Delbanco TL. Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital: when do physicians talk with patients? N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1089–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miles SH, Gomez CF. Protocols for elective use of life-sustaining treatments: a design guide. New York: Springer, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Makadon HJ, Gibbons MP. Nurses and physicians: prospects for collaboration. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:134–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziegfeld C, Jones S. An innovative strategy to facilitate nurse—physician interaction. J Continuing Educ in Nurs. 1987;18:47–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Walker
    • 1
  • Steven H. Miles
    • 2
  • Carol B. Stocking
    • 3
  • Mark Siegler
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Ethics and HumanitiesUniversity of South Florida College of MedicineTampa
  2. 2.the Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineHennepin County Medical CenterMinneapolis
  3. 3.the Center for Clinical Medical Ethics and the Department of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations