Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 389–393 | Cite as

Factors predicting readmission of older general medicine patients

  • Robert Burns
  • Linda Olivia Nichols
Original Articles


Objectives:1) Identify demographic, clinical, social support, functional, and psychological factors about which data are available within 24 hours of hospital admission associated with emergent unscheduled readmission for a group of older general medicine patients; 2) develop a model to predict emergent readmission.

Design:Interview- and cbart-based study of emergent admissions that occurred within 60 days of discharge.

Setting:General medicine wards of the Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, an 862-bed university-affiliated tertiary care facility.

Patients/participants:General medicine patients ≥ 65 years old (n=173). Inclusion criteria were willingness to participate, written consent (patient or family member), and patient interview within 36 hours of admission.

Measurements and main results:The dependent variable was emergent readmission within 60 days of discharge from the hospital. Independent variables included demographic (age, race, income, education), social support (marital status, living arrangements), psychological (cognition, depression), activities of daily living functioning, and clinical (diagnoses, type and source of admission, length of stay, numbers of hospitalizations and days of hospitalizations in the past year, illness severity) parameters. Readmitted patients were emergently admitted and more severely ill, had more diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or congestive heart failure (CHF), less ischemic heart disease, and more hospitalizations and hospital days in the past year (all p<0.05). Logistic regression identified diagnostic group (COPD or CHF), emergent admission, and admission severity of illness as predictive of readmission. The likelihood of being readmitted was 5.4. Accuracy of the three-variable model was 76%, predicted value positive, 73%, and predictive value negative, 77%.

Conclusions:Chronically ill patients who are severely ill at index admission and who have had several hospitalizations in the past year tend to be readmitted. Using this model, high-risk patients may be prospectively targeted to reduce readmissions.

Key words

emergent readmission severity of illness chronic disease prediction model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson GF, Steinberg EP. Hospital readmissions in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1349–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steel K, Gertman P, Crescenzi C, Anderson J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:638–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gooding J, Jette AM. Hospital readmissions among the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:595–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham H, Livesley B. Can readmissions to a geriatric unit be prevented? Lancet. 1983;i:404–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fethke CC, Smith IM, Johnson N. “Risk’ factors affecting readmission of the elderly into the health care system. Med Care. 1986;24:429–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holloway JJ, Medendorp SV, Bromberg J. Risk factors for early readmission among veterans. Health Serv Res. 1990;25:213–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holloway JJ, Thomas JW, Shapiro L. Clinical and sociodemographic risk factors for readmission of Medicare beneficiaries. Health Care Financing Rev. 1988;10:27–36.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips RS, Safran C, Cleary PD, Delbanco TL. Predicting emergency readmissions for patients discharged from the medical service of a teaching hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:400–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson GF, Steinberg EP. Predicting hospital readmission in the Medicare population. Inquiry. 1985;22:251–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherwood SJ, Morris J, Mor V, Gutkin C. Compendium of measures for describing and assessing long term care populations. Boston: Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged (mimeo), 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horn SD, Horn RA. Reliability and validity of the Severity of Illness Index. Med Care. 1986;24:159–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:240–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gambino R. The misuse of predictive value—or why you must consider the odds. Lab Report. 1989;11:65–71.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rossner B. Fundamentals of biostatics, 2nd ed. Boston: Duxbury Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith DM, Norton JA, McDonald CJ. Nonelective readmissions of medical patients. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38:213–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith DM, Norton JA, Roberts SD, Maxey WA, McDonald CJ. Unexpected hospital admissions among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:41–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reed RL, Pearlman RA, Buchner DM. Risk factors for early unplanned hospital readmission in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:223–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rich MW, Freedland KE. Effect of DRGs on three-month readmission rate of geriatric patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:680–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Burns
    • 1
  • Linda Olivia Nichols
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Geriatric Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical CenterUniversity of TennesseeMemphis
  2. 2.the Interdisciplinary Team Training Program, Veterans Affairs Medical CenterUniversity of TennesseeMemphis

Personalised recommendations