Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp 452–453 | Cite as

The dynamic nature of sensitivity and specificity

  • Richard P. Lofgren


  1. 1.
    Casscells W, Schoenberger A, Graboys TB. Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. N Engl J Med 1978;299:999–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griner PF, Panzer RJ, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures: principles and applications. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:553–600Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feinstein AR. Diagnostic and spectral markers. In: Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1985:597–631Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978;299:926–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hlatky MA, Pryor DB, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Am J Med 1984;77:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fletcher RH. Carcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:66–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isenberg DA, Hammond L, Fisher C, et al. Predictive value of SS-B precipitating antibodies in Sjögren’s syndrome. Br Med J 1982;284:1738–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tan EM. Special antibodies for the study of systemic lupus erythematosus: an analysis. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:753–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Berman D, et al. The declining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med 1983;309:518–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard P. Lofgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Medical CenterMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations