Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 218–223 | Cite as

Quality of life following intensive care

  • Donald L. Patrick
  • Marion Danis
  • Leslie I. Southerland
  • Guiyoung Hong
Original Articles


Evaluations of intensive care have largely focused on survival, cost, or functional status; however, these may not be the only outcomes of interest to patients, families, and health care providers. Quality of life is an important consideration in evaluating intensive care because it influences decisions about the use of life-sustaining treatment. A study was conducted to assess the quality of life of survivors of intensive care to determine the relationship of perceived quality of life to other outcomes of intensive care. Patients at least 55 years old who received medical intensive care during 1983 (n=69) were interviewed to determine social characteristics, functional status, psychological well-being, and their perceived quality of life using a new 11-item Perceived Quality of Life scale. Functional status correlated only moderately with perceived quality of life (r=0.49, p=0.0001). Objective measures of patients’ material and social resources did not predict satisfaction. To evaluate outcome adequately, it is necessary to assess perceptions of life quality from patients who have received life-sustaining treatment.

Key words

quality of life intensive care critical care health status aged ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berenson RA. Intensive care units (ICUs): clinical outcomes, costs, and decision making. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress OTA-HCS-28, 1984Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parno JR, Teres D, Lemeshaw S, Brown RB, Avrunin JS. Two-year outcome of adult intensive care patients. Med Care 1984;22:167–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldstein RL, Campion EW, Thibault GE, Mulley AG, Skinner E. Functional outcomes following medical intensive care. Crit Care Med 1986;14:783–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chassin MR. Costs and outcomes of medical intensive care. Med Care 1982;20:165–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. Evaluating outcome from intensive care: a preliminary multihospital comparison. Crit Care Med 1982;10:491–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cullen DJ, Keene R, Waternaux C, et al. Results, charges, and benefits of intensive care for critically ill patients: update 1983. Crit Care Med 1984;12:102–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. A report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patrick DL, Elinson J. Sociomedical approaches to disease and treatment outcomes. Qual Life Cardiovasc Care 1984;1:53–62Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hornquist JO. The concept of quality of life. Scand J Soc Med 1982;10:57–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Danis M, Green M, Southerland LI, Patrick DL. Patient and family preferences for medical intensive care. Clin Res (abstr) 1987;35:737Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donald CA, Ware JE Jr. Quantification of social contacts and resources. Santa Monica CA: Rand Corporation, 1982 (Rand Publication No. R-2937-HHS)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dupuy H. The Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index. in: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J (eds). Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: LeJacq, 1984Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campion EW, Mulley AG, Goldstein RL, Barnett GO, Thibault GE. Medical intensive care for the elderly. A study of current use, costs, and outcomes. JAMA 1981;246:2052–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deyo RA, Inui TS, Leininger J, Overman S. Physical and psychosocial function in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical use of a self-administered health status instrument. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:879–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 1984. Washington, DC: DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85-1232, Public Health Service, US Government Printing Office, 1984Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norburn J, Patrick DL, Beresford SA, Stein J. Functional status and perceived quality of life among older persons. Proceedings of the 21st Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics, 13–15 July 1987. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics, 1987Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaren B, Hedstrand U. Quality of life among long-term survivors of intensive care. Crit Care Med 1987;15:743–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Row Peterson, 1957Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brickman P, Campbell DT. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: MH Appley (ed). Adaptation-level theory: a symposium. New York: Academic Press, 1971Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Croog SH, Levine S. Life after a heart attack. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1982Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andrews FM. Research on the quality of life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1986Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mcdowell I, Newell C. Measuring health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Najman J, Levine S. Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: a review and critique. Soc Sci Med 1981;15F:107–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-Index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 1981;34:585–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald L. Patrick
    • 1
  • Marion Danis
    • 2
  • Leslie I. Southerland
    • 2
  • Guiyoung Hong
    • 3
  1. 1.the Department of Social and Administrative Medicine (DLP)University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill
  2. 2.the Department of Medicine (MD, LID)University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill
  3. 3.the Department of Psychology (GH)University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations