Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 1, Issue 5, pp 275–281 | Cite as

Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice

Comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society guidelines
  • Stephen J. McPhee
  • Robert J. Richard
  • Sharon N. Solkowitz
Original Articles

Abstract

The authors evaluated use of seven cancer screening tests by 52 providers in a university general internal medicine practice, using 1980 American Cancer Society (ACS) recommendations as standards for comparison. Performance rates were determined by retrospective medical record reviews of a stratified random sample of 525 patients. In addition, the 48 physicians and four nurse-practitioners in the practice were interviewed to determine their opinions, knowledge and perceived use of the tests. Performance rates were low, significantly below the ACS quidelines for all tests except Pap smear. Providers used the tests significantly more often to evaluate patients with cancer risk factors or for new patients. They significantly overestimated their own performances of six tests. More than a fourth of the providers disagreed with the use of mammography, sigmoidoscopy, pelvic or rectal examinations for screening asymptomatic adults. Their knowledge about cancer screening and the ACS recommendations was highly variable, and frequently quite limited. Providers offered four major reasons for not performing the screening tests: provider forgetfulness, lack of time, inconvenience and logistical difficulties, and patient discomfort or refusal.

Key words

American Cancer Society recommendations cancer screening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. ACS report on the cancer-related health checkup. CA 1980;30:194–240Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Cancer Society. Mammography 1982: a statement of the ACS. CA 1982;32:226Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American College of Physicians, Medical Practice Committee. Periodic health examination: a guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymptomatic patient. Ann Intern Med 1981;95:729–32Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 1979;121:1193–254Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romm FJ, Fletcher SW, Hulka BS. The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists’ performance. South Med J 1981;74:265–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Battista RN. Adult cancer screening prevention in primary care: patterns of practice in Quebec. Am J Public Health 1983;73:1036–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietrich AJ, Goldberg H. Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ? Am J Public Health 1984;74:223–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woo B, Woo B, Cook EF, et al. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult: comparison of physicians’ recommendations, patients’ desires, published guidelines and actual practice. JAMA 1985;254:1480–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Cancer Society. Survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA 1985;35:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCusker J, Morrow GR. Factors related to the use of early cancer detection techniques. Preventive Med 1980;9:288–397Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wechsler H, Levine S, Idelson RK, et al. The physician’s role in health promotion: a survey of primary care practitioners. N Engl J Med 1983;308:97–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Connelly JE. Periodic health examination. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:528–9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carter WB, Belcher DW, Inui TS. Implementing preventive care in clinical practice: II. Problems for managers, clinicians and patients. Med Care Rev 1981;38:195–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perera DR, Logerfo JP, Shulenberger E, et al. Teaching sigmoidoscopy to primary care physicians: a controlled study of continuing medical education. J Farn Pract 1983;16:785–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winickoff RN, Coltin KL, Morgan MM, et al. Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Med Care 1984;22:527–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen DI, Littenberg B, Wetzel C, et al. Improving physician compliance with preventive medicine guidelines. Med Care 1982;20:1040–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davidson RA, Fletcher SW, Retchin SM, et al. A nurse-initiated reminder system for the periodic health examination: implementation and evaluation. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:2167–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record: a two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1984;100:130–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gates SJ, Colborn DK. Lowering appointment failures in a neighborhood health center. Med Care 1976;14:263–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dales LG, Friedman GD, Collen MF. Evaluating a periodic multiphasic health check-up: a controlled trial. J Chronic Dis 1979;32:385–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Research and Educations in Primary Care Internal Medicine 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. McPhee
    • 1
  • Robert J. Richard
  • Sharon N. Solkowitz
  1. 1.Division of General Internal MedicineSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations