Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 356–362 | Cite as

Withdrawing routine outpatient medical services

Effects on access and health
  • Stephan D. Fihn
  • John B. Wicher
Original Articles


In 1983 a budget shortfall at the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center prompted termination of regular outpatient care for individuals of low legal priority deemed medically stable by administrative criteria. The authors examined the effects on health status and access to medical care of 157 discharged patients and 74 comparison subjects who met the discharge criteria but were retained. Seventeen months after termination, 41% of discharged patients reported their self-perceived health status was “much worse,” compared with 8% of retained patients (p < 0.001). Among discharged patients, 23% had seen no health care provider, 58% believed they lacked access to necessary care, and 47% had reduced prescribed medications. In contrast, all retained patients had seen a provider, 5% claimed to lack access, and 25% had reduced medications. Among discharged patients for whom complete follow-up data were available, the percentage whose blood pressures were out of control at their 13-month follow-up visits was 41%, compared with 5% at the time of discharge. This marked change contrasted with a rise from 9% to 17% among retained patients. A best-case/worse-case analysis indicated that the findings could not be fully explained by biased follow-up. Administrative criteria did not accurately identify medically stable patients. During the study interval 25% of discharged patients were hospitalized and at least 6% died. These findings suggest that federal health care programs are important to many indigent patients and that withdrawing services may have deleterious consequences

Key words

ambulatory care access to care hypertension 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Romm FJ, Cockrell WE III, Feussner JR. Veterans Administration and ambulatory care: the low priority veteran. South Med J 1984;77:489–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lurie N, Ward NB, Shapiro MF, Brook RH. Termination from MediCal—Does it affect health? N Engl J Med 1984;311:480–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lurie N, Ward NB, Shapiro MF, Gallego C, Vaghaiwalla R, Brook RH. Termination of Medi-Cal benefits. A follow-up study one year later. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1266–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Public Law 93–82, Veterans Health Care Expansion Act of 1973. Aug 2, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brook RH, Ware JR Jr, Davies-Avery A, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance experiment. Santa Monica, CA 90406: Rand Corporation, 1979 (Rand publication no. R-1987/8-HEW).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deyo RA, Inui TS. Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Services Res 1984;19:275–89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davies AR, Ware JR Jr. Measuring health perceptions in the health insurance experiment. Santa Monica, CA 90406: Rand Corporation, 1981 (Rand publication no. R-27111-HHS).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manning WG, Newhouse JP, Ware JE Jr. The status of health in demand estimation; or, beyond excellent, good, fair, and poor. In: Fuchs V, ed. Economic aspects of health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982;143–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health 1982;72:800–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veterans Administration. Budget in brief. Fiscal year 1979, Jan 1978. Office of Budget and Finance (Controller). Washington DC 20420; 7, 69.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veterans Administration. Budget in brief. Fiscal year 1982. Jan 1981. Office of Budget and Finance (Controller), Washington DC 20420; 7, 87.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Veterans Administration. Budget in Brief. Fiscal year 1985. Jan 1984. Office of Budget and Finance (Controller), Washington DC 20420, 11, 87.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Indexes of medical care prices: 1970–1984. Statistical abstracts of the United States. 106th ed. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1986: Table 155, p 100.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    15.Charles G. The physician, rationing, and medical care in the Veterans Administration. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:850–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inui TS, Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE. Patients, clinicians, and problems in the VA’s ambulatory care system. VA Pract March 1984;40–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fuchs VR. The ”rationing” of medical care. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1572–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Special report. Access to health care in the United States: resuits of a 1986 survey. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ, No. 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Academy of Sciences National Research Council. Study of health care for American veterans. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1977;29, Table 155, p 100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan D. Fihn
    • 1
  • John B. Wicher
  1. 1.Medical Comprehensive Care Unit (111M)Seattle VA Medical CenterSeattle

Personalised recommendations