A primary care (PC) pathway was initiated within the medical residency program at Boston City Hospital (BCH) in 1974. The authors studied the PC and traditional (TD) track graduates of the program to compare career development, goals, and practice patterns. The 185 graduates of the nine resident cohorts from 1974 through 1983 were surveyed; the overall response rate was 74%. Primary care careers have been chosen by 81% of PC graduates, compared with 38% of TD graduates (p<0.001); career satisfaction is equally high in the two groups. Among the PC graduates, 68% are practicing in high-need areas, compared with only 37% of TD graduates (p<0.001). PC graduates are more likely to make house calls, provide extended office hours, round in nursing homes or chronic care facilities, and co-practice with nurse practitioners or physician’s assistants, and they are more active in women’s health care, care of the terminally ill, and treating patients with sexual dysfunction (all p<0.05). PC graduates utilize various community agencies more frequently and supplement patient education with outside resources more intensively (p<0.001). The career choices and practice locations of PC graduates reflect the training goals of the PC curriculum and differ from the career choices and practices of the TD graduates from the same program.
primary care training career development residency
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Millis JS. A Rational Public Policy for Medical Education and Its Financing: A Report to the Board of Directors. the National Fund for Medical Education, University Circle Research Center, 11000 Cedar Avenue, Cleveland, OH 1971Google Scholar
Weil PA, Schleiter MK, Tarlov AR. National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: V. Comparison of residents in internal medicine: future generalist and specialists. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:678–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
Weil PA, Schleiter MK. National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: VI. Factors predicting preferences of residents for careers in primary care or subspecialty care and clinical practice or academic medicine. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:691–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kletke PR, Schleiter MK, Tarlov AR. Changes in the supply of internists: the internal medicine population from 1978 to 1998. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:93–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg DL, Pozen JT, Cohen AS. The effect of a primary-care pathway on internal medicine residents’ career plans. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:271–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
Decker DL, Cohen AS. Hospital postgraduate training: factors affecting prospective interns’ ranking of a municipal hospital program in internal medicine. Am J Med Sci 1981;281(3):122–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst RL, Yett DE. Physician Location and Specialty Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1985Google Scholar
Wechsler H, Dorsey JL, Bovey JD. A follow-up study of residents in internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics - gynecology training programs in Massachusetts. N Engl J Med 1978;298:15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers DE. Internists: more specialists or more generalists? Ann Intern Med 1985;102:702–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
Holden WD, Levit EJ. Migration of physicians from one specialty to another: a longitudinal study of U.S. medical school graduates. JAMA 1978;249:205–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar