Test

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 291–299 | Cite as

On the bayesianity of pereira-stern tests

  • M. Regina Madruga
  • Luis G. Esteves
  • Sergio Wechsler
Article

Abstract

C. Pereira and J. Stern have recently introduced a measure of evidence of a precise hypothesis consisting of the posterior probability of the set of points having smaller density than the supremum over the hypothesis. The related procedure is seen to be a Bayes test for specific loss functions. The nature of such loss functions and their relation to stylised inference problems are investigated. The dependence of the loss function on the sample is also discussed as well as the consequence of the introduction of Jeffrey’s prior mass for the precise hypothesis on the separability of probability and utility.

Key Words

Bayesian Inference Decision Theory hypothesis test loss functions 

AMS subject classification

62C10 62A15 62F15 62F03 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basu, D. (1975). Statistical information and likelihood (with discussion).Sankhyã A 37, 1–71.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, J.O. and M. Delampady (1987). Testing precise hypotheses (with discussion).Statistical Science 2, 317–352.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardo, J.M. and A.F.M. Smith (1994).Bayesian Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans, M. (1997). Beyesian inference procedures derived via the concept of relative surprise.Communications in Statistics 26, 1125–1143.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Good, I.J. (1988). Surprise index.Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences,9, 104–109 (S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson and C.B. Reid, eds.) John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Hwang, J.T., G. Casella, C.P. Robert, M.T. Wells and R.G. Farrel (1992). Estimation of accuracy in testing.Annals of Statistics 20, 490–509.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeffreys, H. (1961).Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kadane, J.B. (1992). Healthy scepticism as an expected utility explanation of the phenomena of Allais and Ellsberg.Theory and Decision 32, 57–64.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pereira, C.A. de B. and J. Stern (1999). Evidence and Credibility: a full Bayesian test of precise hypothesis.Entropy 1, 104–115.Google Scholar
  10. Rubin, H. (1987). A weak system of axioms for ‘rational’ behaviour and the non-separability of utility from prior.Statistics and Decisions 5, 47–58.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Savage, L.J. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Española de Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Regina Madruga
    • 1
  • Luis G. Esteves
    • 2
  • Sergio Wechsler
    • 2
  1. 1.Departmento de EstatísticaUniversidade Federal do ParáSão Paulo-SPBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Matemática e EstatísticaUniversidade de São PauloSão Paulo-SPBrazil

Personalised recommendations