Mathematical Programming

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 327–338 | Cite as

Stability of the linear complementarity problem at a solution point

  • Cu Duong HA 
Article

Abstract

In this paper we study the behavior of a solution of the linear complementarity problem when data are perturbed. We give characterizations of strong stability of the linear complementarity problem at a solution. In the case of stability we give sufficient and necessary conditions.

Key words

Linear Complementarity Problem Stability Perturbation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Aganagic and R.W. Cottle, “A note onQ-matrices”,Mathematical Programming 16 (1979) 374–377.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R.D. Doverspike, “Some perturbation results for the linear complementarity problem”,Mathematical Programming 23 (1982) 181–192.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.D. Doverspike and C.E. Lemke, “A partial characterization of a class of matrices defined by solutions to the linear complementarity problem”,Mathematics of Operations Research 7 (1982) 272–294.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    B.C. Eaves, “The linear complementarity problem”,Management Science 17 (1971) 612–634.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.B. Garcia, “Some classes of matrices in linear complementarity theory”,Mathematical Programming 5 (1974) 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    L.M. Kelly and L.T. Watson, “Erratum: Some perturbation theorems forQ-matrices”,SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 34 (1978) 320–321.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    L.M. Kelly and L.T. Watson, “Q-matrices and spherical geometry”,Linear Algebra and its Applications 25 (1979) 175–190.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    C.E. Lemke, “Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming”,Management Science 11 (1965) 681–689.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O.L. Mangasarian, “Locally unique solutions of quadratic programs, linear and nonlinear complementarity problems”,Mathematical Programming 19 (1980) 200–212.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    O.L. Mangasarian, “Characterizations of bounded solutions of linear complementarity problems”,Mathematical Programming Study 19 (1982) 153–166.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    K.G. Murty, “On the number of solutions to the complementarity problem and spanning properties of complementarity cones”,Linear Algebra and its Applications 5 (1972) 65–108.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.S. Pang, “OnQ-matrices”,Mathematical Programming 17 (1979) 243–247.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S.M. Robinson, “Generalized equations and their solutions, Part I: basic theory”,Mathematical Programming Study 10 (1979) 128–141.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S.M. Robinson, “Strongly regular generalized equations”,Mathematics of Operations Research 5 (1980) 43–62.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S.M. Robinson, “Some continuity properties of polyhedral multifunctions”,Mathematical Programming Study 14 (1981) 206–214.MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Tamir, “The complementarity problem of mathematical programming”, Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, OH, 1973).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    L.T. Watson, “A variational approach to the linear complementarity problem”, Doctoral thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI, 1974).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    L.T. Watson, “Some perturbation theorems forQ-matrices”,SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 31 (1976) 379–384.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Mathematical Programming Society, Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cu Duong HA 
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations