Child and Youth Care Forum

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 87–111

Orphanage alumni: How they have done and how they evaluate their experience

Articles

Abstract

Critics of long-term institutional stays for children charge that such stays damage children emotionally, intellectually, and behaviorally. This article reports the findings of the first large survey of middle-aged and older adults who several decades ago spent a significant portion of their childhoods in institutions that provided long-term care for disadvantaged children—“orphanages.” The study covers the survey responses of nearly 1,600 alumni from nine homes in the South and Midwest. The general conclusion drawn from the survey responses stands in sharp contrast to conventional professional opinion: As a group, the “orphans” have outpaced their counterparts in the general population by significant margins on practically all social and economic measures covered, not the least of which are education, income, and attitude toward life.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bender, L. (1945). Infants reared in institutions permanently handicapped.Bulletin/Child Welfare League of America, 24, 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. Bodman, F., McKinlay, M. & Sykes, K. (1950). The social adaptation of institutional children.Lancet, 258, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogen, H. (1992).The luckiest orphans: A history of the Hebrew orphan asylum of New York. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1944). Forty-four juvenile thieves.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 25, 19–53, 107–128.Google Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1951).Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, F. (1937). Neuroticism of institution vs. non-institution children.Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 379–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandler, T.E. (1990).Tough mercy: Lost in despair, we found ourselves at the orphanage. Thomasville, N.C.: Baptist Children’s Homes of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  8. Cmiel, K. (1995).A home of another kind: One Chicago orphanage and the tangle of child welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Child Welfare League of America, Inc. (1994).Welfare reform: Facts on orphanages, Washington, D.C., December 14.Google Scholar
  10. Ford, M. & Kroll, J. (1995).There is a better way: Family-based alternatives to institutional care. Washington, D.C.: North American Council on Adoptable Children,Research Brief, no.3, March.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, A., Solnit, A., & Goldstein, H. (1973).Beyond the best interests of the child. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
  12. Goldfarb, W. (1943). The effects of early institutional care on adolescent personality.Journal of Experimental Education, 12, 106–129.Google Scholar
  13. Goldfarb, W. (1945a). The effects of early institutional care on adolescent personality,American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 14, 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldfarb, W. (1945b). Effects of psychological deprivation in infancy and subsequent stimulation. Rorschach data.American Journal of Psychiatry, 102, 18–33.Google Scholar
  15. Goldfarb, W. (1947). Variations in adolescent adjustment of institutional-reared children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 17, 449–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldfarb, W. (1949). Rorschach test differences between family-reared, institution-reared, and schizophrenic children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 19, 624–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, H. (1996).The home on Gorham Street and the voices of its children. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hess, R.D. & Holloway, S.D. (1984). Family and school as educational institutions. In Parke, R.D. (Ed.),Review of Child Development Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7, 179–222.Google Scholar
  19. Hodges, J. & Tizard, B. (1989a) IQ and behavioral adjustment of ex-institutional adolescents.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(1), 53–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodges, J. & Tizard, B. (1989b). Social and family relationships of ex-institutional adolescents.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 77–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kagan, J. (1984)The nature of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Langmeier, J. & Matejcek, Z. (1975).Psychological Deprivation in Childhood (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. McCall, J. (1996)Research on the psychological effects of orphanage care: A critical review. Irvine, Calif.: Graduate School of Management, University of California, Irvine, working paper.Google Scholar
  24. McKenzie, R. (1996).The home: A memoir of growing up in an orphanage. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Mead, M. (1962). A cultural anthropologist’s approach to maternal deprivation. In Ainsworth, M.D. (Ed.),Deprivation of maternal care: A reassessment of its effects. Geneva: World Health Organization (no. 14).Google Scholar
  26. O’Connor, N. (1956). The evidence for the permanently disturbing effects of mother-child separation.Acta Psychologica, 12, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orlansky, H. (1949). Infant care and personality.Psychological Bulletin, 46, 1–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinneau, S.R. (1955). The infantile disorders of hospitalism and anaclitic depression.Psychological Bulletin, 52(5), 429–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Provence, S. (1989). Infants in institutions revisited.Zero to Three, 9(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
  30. Prugh, D. & Harlow, R. (1962). Masked deprivation in infants and young children. In Ainsworth, M. (Ed.).Deprivation of maternal care: A reassessment of its effects. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  31. Quinton, D., Rutter, M., & Liddle, C. (1984). Institutional rearing, parenting difficulties, and marital support.Psychological Medicine, 14, 107–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rutter, M., Quinton, D. & Hill, J. (1990). Adult outcomes of institution-reared children: Males and females compared. In Robbins, L.N. (Ed.).Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adult life. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Seita, J., Martin M., & Christi T. (1996).In whose best interest?: One child’s odyssey, a nation’s responsibility. Elizabethtown, Penn.: Continental Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shealy, C.N. (1995). From boys town to Oliver Twist: Separating fact from fiction in welfare reform and out-of-home placement of children and youth.American Psychologist, 50(8) August, 565–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith. E. P. (1995) Bring back orphanages? What policymakers of today can learn from the past.Child Welfare, January/February,74, 115–138.Google Scholar
  36. Spitz, R. A. (1945). Hospitalism: An inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood.Psychoanalytic Studies of the Child, 1, 53–74 and2, 113–117.Google Scholar
  37. Stone, L. J. (1954). A critique of studies of infant isolation.Child Development, 25(1), 9–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Trotzkey, E. (1930).Institutional care and placing-out. Chicago: Marks Nathan Jewish Orphan Home.Google Scholar
  39. Zmora, N. (1994).Orphanages reconsidered: Child care institutions in progressive era. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.the Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of California at IrvineIrvine

Personalised recommendations