Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 37, Issue 7, pp 2295–2311 | Cite as

Fluidized bed heat treatment of cast Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloys

  • S. K. Chaudhury
  • D. Apelian
Article
Received:

Abstract

The effects of fluidized bed heat treatment on the microstructural and mechanical properties of Al-Si-Cu-Mg cast alloys, namely, 354 and 319, were studied. The heating rate in fluidized beds (FBs) is greatervis-à-vis conventional electrical resistance furnaces (CFs). The high heating rate in FBs increases the kinetics of metallurgical phenomena such as Si fragmentation and spherodization during solution heat treatment, as well as the precipitation rate of phases such as Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 and Al2Cu during aging. It is observed that the dissolution rate of phases such as Mg2Si and Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 takes place very rapidly. The solution heat treatment of 319 alloy using FB results in complete dissolution of Mg2Si and Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 particles within 45 minutes. However, for phases such as Al2Cu and Ferich intermetallics, the dissolution rate is relatively slow. Even on prolonged solution heat treatment for 6 hours, these phases do not dissolve completely. It is observed that incomplete dissolution of the Al2Cu phase does not significantly affect tensile properties of T4-treated alloys. The optimum solution heat-treatment time in FB for both 354 and 319 alloys is 45 minutes at 527 °C and 493 °C, respectively. Thermal analysis shows an exothermic peak owing to recrystallization and coarsening of eutectic grains during solution heat treatment. The high heating rate in FB causes this transformation to take place at a lower temperature than in CF. It is observed that the nucleation rate of Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 during aging in FB is greater than using CF. Thermal analysis of samples during the ramp-up stage while aging using FB did not show any phase transformation, while those using CF show two endothermic transformations, which are most likely due to the dissolution of GP zones or the co-cluster of solutes. Aging at 200 °C results in a greater number density of precipitates than those at 240 °C. The tensile strength of samples aged at 200 °C is greater than those aged at 240 °C, because the amount of precipitates formed at 200 °C is greater than that at 240 °C. The total heat-treatment time for T6 temper is less than 2 hours in FBs, which is a significant reduction in heat-treatment time, as well as energy consumption.

Keywords

Material Transaction Ultimate Tensile Strength Solution Heat Treatment Isopleth Diagram Conventional Electrical Furnace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Apelian, S. Shivkumar, and G. Sigworth:AFS Trans., 1989, vol. 89–137, pp. 727–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASM Handbook, vol. 2,Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1991, pp. 159–67.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Shivkumar, L. Wang, and C. Keller:Z. Metallkd., 1994, vol. 85 (6), pp. 394–99.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Li, A.M. Samuel, F.H. Samuel, C. Ravindran, S. Valtierra, and H.W. Doty:Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2004, vol. 367 (1–2), pp. 96–110.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.M. Samuel and F.H. Samuel:Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1995, vol. 26A (9), pp. 2359–72.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.J. Martinez, M.A. Cisneros, S. Valtierra, and J. Lacaze:Scripta Mater., 2005, vol. 52 (6), pp. 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Backerud, G. Chai, and J. Tamminen:AFS/SKANALUMINIUM, 1990, vol. 71, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.H. Sokolowski, M.B. Djurdjevic, C.A. Kierkus, and D.O. Northwood:J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2001, vol. 109 (1–2), pp. 174–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.X. Li, R.D. Li, Y.H. Zhao, L.Z. He, C.X. Li, H.R. Guan, and Z.Q. Hu:Mater. Lett., 2004, vol. 58 (15), pp. 2096–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.L. Zhang and L. Zheng:Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A (12), pp. 3983–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Zafar, N. Ikram, M.A. Shaik, and K.A. Shoaib:J. Mater. Sci., 1990, vol. 25 (5), pp. 2595–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.G. Kang, M. Kida, H. Miyahara, and K. Ogi:AFS Trans. 1999, vol. 107, pp. 507–15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Oullet and F.H. Samuel:J. Mater. Sci., 1999, vol. 34 (19), pp. 4671–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Beumler, A. Hammerstad, B. Wieting, and R. Dasgupta:AFS Trans., 1986, vol. 96, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.K. Chaudhury, L. Wang, and D. Apelian,AFS Trans., 2004, vol. 112, Paper 04-055, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.W. Reynoldson:Heat Treatment in Fluidized Bed Furnaces, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 34–36.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Keist:J. Met., 2005, vol. 57 (4), pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Apelian and S.K. Chaudhury:J. Phys. IV, 2004, vol. 120, pp. 555–62.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Holland-Moritz, D.M. Herlach, and K. Urban:Physical Rev. Lett., 1993, vol. 71 (8), pp. 1196–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Yan, L. Ding, S.L. Chen, F. Xie, M. Chu, and Y.A. Chang:Light Metals, 130th TMS Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Feb. 11–15, 2001, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2001, pp. 1091–97.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.L. Chen, F. Zhang, S Daniel, F.Y. Xie, X.Y. Yan, Y.A. Chang, R. Schmid-Fetzer, and W.A. Oates:J. Met., 2003, vol. 55 (12), pp. 48–51.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.H. Mulazimoglu, N. Tenekdijev, B.M. Closet, and J.E. Gruzleski:Cast Met., 1993, vol. 6, pp. 16–28.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L.A. Narayanan, F.H. Samuel, and J.E. Gruzleski:Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1994, vol. 25A (8), pp. 1761–73.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Q.G. Wang and C.J. Davidson:J. Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 36 (3), pp. 739–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Caudillo, M. Herrera-Trejo, M.R. Castro, E. Ramirez, C.R. Gonzalez, and J.I. Juarez:J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2002, vol. 59 (2), pp. 378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. Vermolen, K. Vuik, and S. Van der Zwaag:Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, vol. 254 (1–2), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Slamova, M. Karlik, M. Cieslar, B. Chalupa, and P. Merle:Kovove Mater., 2002, vol. 40 (6), pp. 389–401.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.H. Caceres, J.H. Sokolowski, and P. Gallo:Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. 271 (1–2), pp. 53–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International & TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Chaudhury
    • 1
  • D. Apelian
    • 1
  1. 1.the Metal Processing Institute (MPI), Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI)Worcester

Personalised recommendations