Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 317–328

A theoretical comparison of electric and magnetic stimulation of the brain

  • Joshua M. Saypol
  • Bradley J. Roth
  • Leonardo G. Cohen
  • Mark Hallett
Article

Abstract

We present a theoretical comparison of the electric field produced in the brain by three modalities of transcranial stimulation of the cortex: magnetic stimulation, bifocal electric stimulation, and unifocal electric stimulation. The primary focus of this comparison is the focality and direction of the electric fields produced. A three-sphere model is used to represent the scalp, skull, and brain. All electric fields are calculated numerically. For magnetic stimulation we consider only a figure-of-eight coil. We find that magnetic stimulation produces the most focal field, while unifocal electric produces the least. Fields produced during magnetic stimulation are parallel to the head surface, while fields produced during electric stimulation have components both parallel and perpendicular to the head surface. The electric field produced by magnetic stimulation is shown to be insensitive to the skull conductivity, while that produced by electric stimulation is very sensitive to it.

Keywords

Magnetic stimulation Electric stimulation Electric field Cortex 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barker, A.T.; Jalinous, R.; Freeston, I.L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. The Lancet 1:1101–1107; 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coburn, B. Neural modeling in electrical stimulation. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17:133–178; 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, D. Some principles of focal magnetic stimulation. 1989 International Motor Evoked Potentials Symposium, Chicago, August 18–20, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, L.G.; Bandinelli, S.; Lelli, S.; Hallett M. Noninvasive mapping of hand motor somatotopic area using magnetic stimulation. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 5:371–372; 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, L.G.; Hallett, M. Methodology for non-invasive mapping of human motor cortex with electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:403–411; 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen, L.G.; Roth, B.J.; Nilsson, J.; Dang, N.; Panizza, M.; Bandinelli, S.; Friauf, W.; Hallett, M. Effect of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75:350–357; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cuffin, B.N. Effects of fissures in the brain on electroencephalograms and magnetoencephalograms. J. Appl. Phys. 57:146–163; 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Day, B.L.; Thompson, P.D.; Dick, J.P.; Nakashima, K.; Marsden, C.D. Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neurosci. Lett. 75:101–106; 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eaton, H.A.C. The electric field induced in a spherical volume conductor by a magnetic coil. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2247–2248; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grandori, F. Intracranial electric fields during transcranial brain, stimulation: Modelling and simulations. In: Rossini, P.M.; Marsden, C.D., eds. Non-invasive stimulation of brain and spinal cord: Fundamentals and clinical applications. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc.; 1988: pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grandori, F.; Rossini, P. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex: Theoretical considerations. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 16:639–652; 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hallett, M.; Cohen, L.G. Magnetism: A new method for stimulation of nerve and brain. JAMA 262:538–541; 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, J.-C., Nicholson, C.; Okada, Y.C. Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue. Biophys. J. 57:1155–1166; 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson, J.D. Classical electrodynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merton, P.A.; Morton, H.B. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subjects. Nature 285:227; 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Merton, P.A.; Morton, H.B.; Hill, D.K.; Marsden, C.D. Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle. Lancet 2:597–600; 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morse, P.M.; Feshbach, H. Methods of theoretical physics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1953.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nunez, P.L. Electric fields of the brain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Penfield, W.; Boldrey, E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443; 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phillips, C.G.; Powell, T.P.S.; Wiesendanger, M. Projection from low-threshold muscle afferents of hand and forearm to area 3a of baboon's cortex. J. Physiol. 217:419–446; 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Purcell, E.M. Electricity and magnetism. Berkeley Physics Course, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1963.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Plonsey, R.; Heppner, D. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull. Math. Biophys. 29:657–664; 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ranck, J.B., Jr. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Research 98:417–440; 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rossini, P.M.; Caramia, M.D. Methodological and physiological considerations on the electric and magnetic transcranial stimulation. In: Rossini, P.M.; Marsden, C.D., eds. Non-invasive stimulation of brain and spinal cord: Fundamentals and clinical applications. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.; 1988: pp. 37–65.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rossini, P.M.; Marciani, M.G.; Caramia, M.; Roma, V.; Zarola F. Nervous propagation along ‘central’ motor pathways in intact man: Characteristics of motor responses to ‘bifocal’ and ‘unifocal’ spine and scalp non-invasive stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:272–286; 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roth, B.J.; Cohen, L.G.; Hallett, M.; Friauf, W. Basser, P.J. A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve. Muscle and Nerve 13:734–741; 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roth, B.J.; Saypol, J.M.; Hallett, M.; Cohen, L.G. A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 81:47–56; 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rush, S.; Driscoll, D.A. Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesthesia and Analgesia 47:717–723; 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rush, S.; Driscoll, D.A. EEG electrode sensitivity—An application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16:15–22; 1968.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rushton, W.A.H. The effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve. J. Physiol. 63:357–377; 1927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schey, H.M. Div, grad, curl, and all that. New York: Norton; 1973.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tofts, P.S. The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. Phys. Med. Biol. 35:1119–1128; 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ueno, S.; Tashiro, T.; Harada, K. Localized stimulation of neural tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields. J. Appl. Phys. 64:5862–5864; 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yunokuchi, K.; Cohen, D.; Cuffin, B.N. Borrowing concepts from biomagnetism in developing a focal magnetic stimulator. 7th International Conference on Biomagnetism Conference Digest, New York, August 14–18, 1989; pp. 161–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press plc 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua M. Saypol
    • 1
  • Bradley J. Roth
    • 1
  • Leonardo G. Cohen
    • 2
  • Mark Hallett
    • 2
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation Program National Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of HealthBethesda
  2. 2.Human Cortical Physiology Unit Human Motor Control Section Medical Neurology Branch National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations