How are scientific corrections made?
- Cite this article as:
- Kiang, N.Y. Sci Eng Ethics (1995) 1: 347. doi:10.1007/BF02583252
This paper provides examples drawn from the author’s experience that support the conclusion that errors and deceptions in archival science are often not easily or quickly corrected. The difficulty in correcting errors and deceptions needs wider recognition if it is to be overcome. In addition, the paper discusses how subtle abuses introduce errors into the archival literature.