Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 265–274 | Cite as

Pattern-onset visual evoked potentials: more useful than reversal for patients with nystagmus

  • Kathryn J. Saunders
  • Graeme Brown
  • Daphne L. McCulloch
Article
Received:

Abstract

Purpose: The visual evoked potential is often used to assess visual function in neurologically impaired patients, a group in whom nystagmus is a common feature. Pattern-reversal stimuli are commonly used to produce visual evoked potentials in clinical practice. Previous reports have shown that this stimulus is not optimal when subjects have nystagmus. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of pattern-onset and reversal stimuli when used to measure visual evoked potentials from subjects with idiopathic nystagmus.Methods: In five adults with congenital nystagmus and 10 visually normal adults, VEPs were recorded and reproduced for checkerboard stimuli of two sizes (120′ and 60′). Each size was presented as both pattern-onset and reversal check.Results: Visually normal adults demonstrated similar visual evoked potential amplitudes and quality in response to pattern-reversal and pattern-onset. However, in the presence of nystagmus, visual evoked potentials recorded to pattern-reversal stimuli were significantly smaller and of poorer quality than those obtained to pattern-onset stimuli (analysis of variance p<0.05; Kendall's tau, p<0.05).Conclusions: Pattern-onset stimuli produce larger and clearer visual evoked potentials in patients with nystagmus compared with those produced to pattern-reversal stimuli.

Key words

nystagmus pattern-onset visual evoked potential pattern-reversal visual evoked potential 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moskowitz A, Sokol S. Developmental changes in the human visual system as reflected by the latency of the pattern reversal VEP. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 56: 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohn G, van Hof van Duin J. Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of visual functions in children with neurological disorders. Behav Brain Res 1983; 10: 177–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bane MC, Birch EE. VEP acuity, FPL acuity and visual behaviour of visually impaired children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992; 29: 202–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Odom JV, Green M. Visually evoked potentials (VEP) acuity: testability in a clinical pediatric population. Acta Ophthalmol 1984; 62: 93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mackie RT, McCulloch DL. Assessment of visual acuity in multiply handicapped children. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 260–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kennerly Bankes JL. Eye defects of mentally handicapped children. Br Med J 1974; 2: 533–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    LoCasio GP. A study of vision in cerebral palsy. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 332–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black P. Visual disorders associated with cerebral palsy. Br J Ophthalmol 1982; 66: 46–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schiemann M. Optometric findings in children with cerebral palsy. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984; 61: 321–3.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maino DM, Maino JH, Maino SA. Mental retardation syndromes with associated ocular defects. J Am Optom Assoc 1990; 61: 707–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keith CG, Kitchen WH. Ocular morbidity in infants of very low birth weight. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 302–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibson NA, Fielder AR, Trounce JQ, Levene MI. Ophthalmic findings in infants of very low birthweight. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990; 32: 7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gallo JE, Lennerstrand G. A population-based study of ocular abnormalities in premature children aged 5 to 10 years. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 539–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pike MG, Holmstrom G, De Vries LS, Pennock JM, Drew KJ, Sonksen PM, Dubowitz LMS. Patterns of visual impairment associated with lesions of the preterm infant brain. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994; 36: 849–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Creel D, Spekreijse H, Reits D. Evoked potentials in albinos: efficacy of pattern stimuli in detecting misrouted optic fibres. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 595–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Apkarian P, Reits D, Spekreijse H. A decisive electrophysiological test for human albinism. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 513–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kriss A, Russell-Eggitt I, Harris CM, Lloyd IC, Taylor D. Aspects of albinism. Ophth Ped Gen 1992; 13: 89–100.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kriss A, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D. Childhood albinism. Visual electrophysiological features. Ophthalmic Pediatr Genet 1990; 11: 185–92.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zubcov AA, Fendick MG, Gottlob I, Wizov SS, Reinecke RD. Visual-evoked cortical potentials in dissociated vertical deviation. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112: 714–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arlt A, Zangemeister WH. Influence of slow eye movement and nystagmus on pattern induced visual evoked potentials. Neuroophthalmol 1990; 10: 241–51.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosenberg ML, Jabbari B. Nystagmus and visual evoked potentials. Neuroophthalmol 1987; 7: 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mackie RT, McCulloch DL, Saunders KJ, Ballantyne J, Day RE, Bradnam MS, Dutton GN. Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children. Eye 1995; 9: 136–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harding GFA, Odom JV, Spileers W, Spekreijse H. Standard for visual-evoked potentials. Vision Res 1996; 36: 567–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chung STL, Bedell HE. Congenital nystagmus image motion: influence on visual acuity at different luminances. Opt Vision Sci 1997; 74: 266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Armington JC, Bloom MB. Relations between the amplitudes of spontaneous saccades and visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1974; 64: 1263–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saunders KJ, McCulloch DL, Mackie RT. Pattern onset VEPs from paediatric patients with nystagmus. Presented at the ISCEV XXXIII Symposium, Athens, Greece, June 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn J. Saunders
    • 1
  • Graeme Brown
    • 1
  • Daphne L. McCulloch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vision ScienceGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations