Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

, Volume 72, Issue 12, pp 1529–1532

Thermal analysis of failed-batch palm oil by differential scanning calorimetry

  • Y. B. Che Man
  • P. Z. Swe


Thermal behavior of palm oil samples drawn from the batch crystallizers that failed during crystallization and of a control oil that was drawn from a batch that produced good crystallization were analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry under constant heating and cooling conditions. Four polymorphs—β’2, α, β’1, and β1—were observed, and their temperatures were tabulated. A rapid and sudden surge of heat demand was observed for samples from failed crystallizers. Less supercooling values were obtained from the control oil compared to the higher values for samples from failed crystallizers. In crystallization thermograms, a sharp high-temperature exotherm (high-T peak) and a broad low-temperature exotherm (low-T peak) were observed. Low-T peaks were found almost invariably stationary at −5.1 to −5.6°C, and high-T peaks varied depending on the saturation level of the oil. A new peak, sandwiched between the high-T and low-T peaks, was observed for the control oil.

Key words

Crystallization DSC polymorph super cooling thermal behavior 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jurriens, G.,Analysis and Characterization of Oils, Fats and Fat Products, Vol. 2, Interscience, London, 1968, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiss, T.J.,Food Oils and Their Uses, 2nd edn., AVI Publishing Co., Westport, 1983, p. 19.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deffense, E.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:376–385 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ng, W.L., Ibid.:879–882 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabe, A., I. Tashima, N. Matsuzaki, J. Kurashige, and K. Sato, Ibid.:1077–1080 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobsberg, B., and O.C. Ho, Ibid.:609–617 (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riiner, U.,Lebensm.-wiss. & Technologie 4:76–84 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Persmark, U., K.A. Melin, and P.O. Stahl,Rev. Ital. Del. Sos. Gra. 53:301–306 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okiy, D.A.,Oleagineux 33:625–628 (1978).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawamura, K.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:753–758 (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rossell, J.B., Ibid.:505–511 (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor, A.M.,Oleagineux 31:73–79 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawamura, K.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 57:48–52 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Putte, K.P.A.M., and B.H. Bakker, Ibid.:1138–1143 (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ng, W.L., and F.C.H Oh, inThe Proceedings of the PORIM International Palm Oil Conference, September 9–14, 1991, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1991, pp. 298–304.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobsberg, B., and D. Jacqmain, inThe Proceedings of the Malaysian International Symposium on Palm Oil Processing and Marketing, June 17–19, 1976, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1976, pp. 143–147.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. B. Che Man
    • 1
  • P. Z. Swe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food TechnologyUniversiti Pertanian MalaysiaSerdang, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations