Applied Physics A

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 155–158 | Cite as

A note on the radiative energy loss from an ion-bombarded surface

  • A. Poradzisz
  • M. Szymoński
  • M. Drwicega
  • E. Lipińska
  • T. Nowak
  • M. Wierba
  • K. Rotocka
  • S. Lazarski
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

It has recently been argued that the heat radiation from spikes, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, plays an important role in thermal behaviour of a copper target bombarded with 100keV Xe+ ions.

In this work we have monitored the temperature evolution of a copper bar subjected to a 40 keV N+, Xe+, Sb2 +, and a 20 keV Sb+ ion bombardment. Our measurements have not revealed any substantial differences between light and heavy ion bombardment as well as between atomic and molecular implantation. Those results are in agreement with the time constant for radiation being long, of order 10−6s. They also agree with the calculations of the radiative energy loss from the spike, based upon both cylindrical and spherical spike models. In all reported cases, the energy lost from the spike via the heat radiation, although much different for different projectiles, is smaller than 1% of the ion deposited energy and its influence on the target temperature evolution lies within uncertainty of a typical ion current measurement.

Keywords

Heat Radiation Effective Emissivity Radiative Energy Loss Damage Depth Spike Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For recent reviews see: R. Behrish (ed.):Sputtering by Particle Bombardment I, Topics Appl. Phys.47 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Kelly: Rad. Eff.32, 91 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.M. Gratton, A. Miotello, C. Tosello: Appl. Phys. A36, 139 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.M. Martynyuk: Russ. J. Phys. Chem.51, 494 (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Urbassek, P. Sigmund: Appl. Phys. A35, 19 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Sigmund, C. Claussen: J. Appl. Phys.52, 990 (1981)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Szymoński, A. Poradzisz: Appl. Phys. A28, 175 (1982)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Szymoński: Nucl. Instr. Meth. B2, 583 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Poradzisz, Z. Postawa, M. Szymoński: Proc. Symp. on Surface Science, ed. by P. Braun et al.: Obertraun (1985) p. 301Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Sigmund, M. Szymoński: Appl. Phys. A33, 141 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Kelly: Surf. Sci.90, 280 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K.B. Winterbon:Ion Implantation Range and Energy Deposition Distributions, Vol. 2 (Plenum, New York 1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Kelly, O. Auciello: Surf. Sci.100, 135 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Poradzisz
    • 1
  • M. Szymoński
    • 1
  • M. Drwicega
    • 2
  • E. Lipińska
    • 2
  • T. Nowak
    • 2
  • M. Wierba
    • 2
  • K. Rotocka
    • 2
  • S. Lazarski
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsJagellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations