Advertisement

Facies

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 177–210 | Cite as

Biostratigraphical correlation of late carboniferous (Kasimovian) sections in the Carnic Alps (Austria/Italy): Integrated paleontological data, facies, and discussion

  • Holger C. Forke
  • Elias Samankassou
Article

Summary

The fusulinacean faunal content of the Bombaso Fm. and lower part of the Auernig Group (Carnic Alps, Austria/Italy) is reviewed and completed by data on conodonts and algae. Four different faunal associations can be distinguished within this stratigraphic interval.

The beginning of the postvariscan sedimentation in the investigated sections is diachronous, shifting in age from early Kasimovian (Krevyakinian) at Zollner Lake and Mt. Auernig, early to middle Kasimovian at Cima Val di Puartis to late Kasimovian (Dorogomilovian) at Mt. Roßkofel.

The sections analyzed consist of shallow-marine sediments, which differ in microfacies of limestones and partly in biotic assemblages. They are geographically isolated and could not be traced laterally for lithologic correlation in the field.

The biostratigraphic correlation with the faunas of the stratotype sections in the Moscow Basin is hindered by the searceness of fusulinaceans in the critical levels, especially in the lowermost Kasimovian, and differences in the species composition. A biostratigraphic correlation of the Bombaso Fm. and basal part of the Auernig Group with the Peski Fm. (Myachkovian) of the Moscow Basin, as suggested byDavydov & Krainer (1999), is not confirmed by our results. Due to our taxonomic reinterpretation of the oldest fauna (Protriticites aff.permirus with distinct mural pores and largeBeedeina (Pseudotriticites) asiaticus) a lowermost Kasimovian (Lower Krevyakinian) age is more probable. This correlation is supported by the co-occurring conodont fauna, which is suggested to belong to the zone of “Streptognathodus subexcelsus”. This biozone reaches from the topmost Peski Fm. to the Suvorovo Fm. (Lower Krevyakinian) in the Moscow Basin, and may be correlated with the uppermost Desmoinesian of the Midcontinent North America.

Fusulinaceans and conodonts of the overlying strata at Zollner Lake and from the sections at Cima Val di Puartis and Mt. Auernig most probably correspond to the upper Krevyakinian/lowermost Khamovnikian of the Russian platform (Lower Missourian of the Midcontinent North America). The algal associations (Dvinella, Beresella, Herakella) from these lowermost strata are unique for the Carnic Alps. Their stratigraphic range points to Moscovian-Kasimovian as well, and fits with the fusulinacean and conodont data.

Sediments of the Nölbling Group (=“untere kalkreiche Schichtgruppe”) have their correlative levels in the upper Khamovnikian, but reach higher into the Dorogomilovian. More reliable correlations are possible with the fusulinacean faunas of the Cantabrian Mts. and Central Asia, based on the coincidence of several species. A revised biostratigraphic correlation with the different remote basins of the Paleotethyan realm and the Russian Platform is given, based on own data and recent results by the members of the SCCS Working group to define a GSSP close to the Moscovian/Kasimovian boundary.

The sequence-stratigraphic scheme, the systematics, and the biostratigraphic correlation ofDavydov & Krainer (1999) are discussed.

Keywords

Biostratigraphy Micropaleontology Facies Fusulinaceans Conodonts Algae Sequence stratigraphy Carnic alps Austria Italy Late carboniferous 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alekseev, A. S. (1998): Graniza moskovskogo i kasimovskogo jarusov v moskve i jejo okrestnostjach.—In:Alekseev, A.S. & Goreeva, N.V. (eds.): Granizy jarusov biotitscheskie cobytija srednego i posdnego karbona.-Vserossiskoe soveschtschanie, tezisy dokladov 2–5, Moscow.Google Scholar
  2. Barrick, J. E. & Boardman, D. R. (1989): Stratigraphic distribution of morphotypes ofIdiognathodus andStreptognathodus in Missourian-Lower Virgilian strata, north central Texas.—In:Barrick, J. E., Boardman, D. R., Cocke, J. & Nestell, M. K. (eds.): Middle and Late Pennsylvanian chronostratigraphic boundaries in north central Texas: glacial-custatic events, biostratigraphy, and paleoecology.-The Geological Society of America, 23nd Annual Meeting South Central Section, Guidebook with contributed papers, Part II, p. 167–189, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensh, F. R. (1972): Stratigrafija i fusulinidy verchnego paleozoja Juzhnoj Fergany.—Akad. Nauk. UzSSR, 1–146, 31 pls., Tashkent (Izd, “FAN”)Google Scholar
  4. Chen, C. (1963): K morfologii i sistematike rodovProtriticites, Quasifusulinoides iObsoletes iz pogranichnych otlozhenii srednego i verchnego karbona.—voprosy micropal.—Akad. Nauk. SSSR,7, 71–84, 5 text-figs., 6 pls., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  5. Davydov, V.I. (1984): zonalnye podrazdelenija verchnego karbona iugo-zapadnogo darvaza.—Bull. Mosk. O-valspytatelei prirody. otd. goel.,59 (3), 41–57, 3 text-figs., LeningradGoogle Scholar
  6. — (1990): Kutochneniyu proiskhozhdeniya i filogenii trititsitesov i granitsy srednego i verkhnego otdelov karbona.—Palcont. Zhurn.,24/2, 13–25, 5 Abb., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  7. — (1997): Middle-Upper Carboniferous boundary: Problems of definition and correlation.—Proceedings of the XIII International Corigress on the Carboniferous and Permian, Krakow, 1995,1, 113–122Google Scholar
  8. Davydov, V.I. &Krainer, K. (1999): Fusulinid assemblages and facies of the Bombaso Fm. and basal Meledis Fm. (Moscovian-Kasimovian) in the Central Carnic Alps (Austria/Italy).—Facies,40, 157–196, pls. 17–24, 6 text-figs., ErlangenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davydov, V. I. & Nilsson, I. (1999): Fusulinid Succession from the Middle-Upper Carboniferous Boundary Beds on Spitsbergen. Arctic Norway.-Palacontologia Electronica,2/1, 45p., 1.5 MB (Coquina Press), http://www-odp.tamu.edu/palco/1999_1/fusulinid/issuel_99.htmGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunbar, C.O. &Skinner, J.W. (1937): Permian Fusulinidae of Texas.—Univ. Texas Bull.,3701, 517–825, 9 figs., 39 pls.Google Scholar
  11. Emery, D. &K. Myers, K. (1996): Sequence stratigraphy.—297 p., Oxford (Blackwell)Google Scholar
  12. Fenninger, A., Flügel, H.W., Holzer, H.-L. &Schönlaub, H.P. (1971): Bericht über detailstratigraphische Aufnahmen im Oberkarbon des Waschbüchel-Profiles (Karnische Alpen).— Verh. Geol. B.-A.,1971/3, 637–642, 1 fig., WienGoogle Scholar
  13. Flügel, E. &Krainer, K. (1992): Allogenic and autogenic controls of reef mound formation: Late Carboniferous auloporid coral buildups from the Carnic Alps Italy.—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont., Abh.,185/1, 39–62 9 Abh., StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritz, A. &Boersma, M. (1986a): Fundberichte über Pflanzenfossilien aus Kärnten 1986, Beitrag 11: Tomritsch-Rücken (Unterstefan) Karnische Alpen.—Carinthia II176/96, 69–85, KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritz, A. &Boersma, M. (1986b): Fundberichte über Pflanzenfossilien aus Kärnten 1986, Beitrag 13: Zollner See (Unterstefan) Karnische Alpen.—Carinthia II,176/96, 147–165, KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  16. Gauri, K.L. (1965): Uralian stratigraphy, Trilobites and Brachiopods of the Western Carnic Alps (Austria).—Jb. Geol. B.-A., Sonderband11, 1–94, WienGoogle Scholar
  17. Goreeva, N. V. (1998): Konodontovaja schkala moskovskogo-kasimovskogo intervala: evoluzija vzgljadov, sovremennoe sostojanie.—In:Alekseev, A. S. & Goreeva, N.V. (eds.): Granizy jarusov biotitscheskie cobytija srednego i posdnego karbona.—Vserossiskoe soveschtschanie, tezisy dokladov. 2–5, MoskvaGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, H.W., Lipps, J.H. &Showers W.J. (1980): Testultrastructure of fusulinid foraminifera.—Nature,283, 853–855, 3 figs, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gubler, J. (1934): Structure et Sécrétion du Test des Fusulinidés.— Annales de Protistologie,4, 1–24, 15 figs., ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Hageman, S. A. &Kaesler, R. L. (1998): Wall structure and growth of fusulinacean foraminifera.—J. Paleont.,72/2, 181–190, 8 text-figs., Tulsa.Google Scholar
  21. Hahn, G. &Hahn, R. (1987): Trilobiten aus dem Karbon von Nötsch und aus den Karnischen Alpen Österreichs.—Jb. Geol. B.-A.,129, 567–619 WienGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayden, H. H. (1909): Fusulinidae of Afghanistan.—Records of the Geological Survey of India,38(3), 230–256, pl 17–22, Calcutta.Google Scholar
  23. Heckel, P.H. (1994): Evaluation of evidence for glacio-eustatic control over marine Pennsylvanian cyclothems in North America and consideration of possible tectonic effects.—In:Dennison, J.M. & Ettensohn, F.R. (eds.): Tectonic and eustatic controls on sedimentary cycles.—Soc. Econ. Paleont. Miner. Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology,4, 65–87, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckel, P. H., Alekseev, A. S. &Nemyrovska, T. I. (1998): Preliminary conodont correlations of late middle to early upper Pennsylvanian rocks between North America and Eastern Europe.—Newsletters on Carb. Stratigraphy,16, 8–12Google Scholar
  25. Henbest, L.G. (1937): Keriothecal wall structure inFusulina and its influence on fusuline classification.—J. Paleont.,11/3, 212–230, 2 pls., Tulsa.Google Scholar
  26. Hfritsch, F., Kahler, F. & Metz, K. (1933): Die Schichtfolge von Oberkarbon und Unterperm.—In:Heritsch, F. (ed.): Die Stratigraphie von Oberkarbon und Perm in den Karnischen Alpen.-Mitt. geol. Ges. Wien,26, 163–180, WienGoogle Scholar
  27. Hottinger, L. (1960): Über paleocaene und eocaene Alveolinen.— Eclogae geol. Helv.,53/1, 265–284, 3 text-figs., 21 pls., Basel.Google Scholar
  28. Ishii K. (1958): On the Phylogeny, Morphology and Distribution ofFusulina, Beedeina and allied fusulinid Genera.—Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Series G,4, 29–64, 4 pls., OsakaGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahler, F. (1983): Fusulinidenaus Karbon und Perm der Karnischen Alpen und der Karawanken.—Carinthia II. Sonderheft,41, 107 S., 11 Taf., KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahler, F. (1985): Oberkarbon und Unterperm der Karnischen Alpen. Ihre Biostratigraphie mit Hilfe der Fusuliniden.— Carinthia II, Sonderheft,42, 93 S., 11 Taf., KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahler, F. (1986): Eine neue Fusuliniden-Gemeinschaft in tiefen Oberkarbon-Schichten der Karnischen Alpen.—Carinthia II,96, 425–441, KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahler, F. (1989): Die Fusuliniden.—In:Ebner, F. & Kahler, F.: Catalogus Fossilium Austriae, Vol. II/B/1: Foraminifera Palaeozoica, 87–272, Register (F. Ebner) 273–295, Wien, (Österr. Akad. Wiss)Google Scholar
  33. Kahler, F. &Kahler, G. (1982): Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fusuliniden der Ostalpen: Oberkarbonische Fusuliniden der Karnischen Alpen.—Palaeontographica. Abt. A,177 89–128, 3 pl., 2 fig., StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  34. Kochansky-Devidf V. (1970): Die Kalkalgen des Karbons vom Velebit-Gebirge (Moskovien und Kassimovien).—Palaeontologia Jugoslavica,10, 1–32, 15 pls., ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  35. Konovalova, M. V. (1991): stratigrafija i fuzulinidi verchnego karbona i nizhnei permi timano. petschorskoi neftegazonocnoi provinzii.-Min-vo geol. SSSR, Uchtinskaja GRE, 201 p., MoskvaGoogle Scholar
  36. Krainer, K. (1992): Fazies, Sedimentationsprozesse und Paläogeographic im Karbon der Ost-und Südalpen.—Jahrb. Geol. B.-A.,135/1, 99–193, 40 Abb., 5 Tab., 7 Taf., WienGoogle Scholar
  37. Leditzky, H.P. (1973): Diestratigraphische Gliederung des Gebietes zwischen Zollnerhöhe und Zollnersee in den Karnischen Alpen.— Carinthia II,163/83, 169–177, KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  38. Luppold, F. W. (1994): Conodontenfunde aus dem Ober-Karbon des Roßkofel (Karnische Alpen, Italien).—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.,1994/9, 537–540, 2 Abb., StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  39. Mamet, B. L., Roux, A. & Nassichuk, W. W. (1987): Algues Carboniferes et Permiennes de l'Arctique Canadien.—Geol. Survey of Canada, Bull.,342, 83 pp., 30 tabs., OttawaGoogle Scholar
  40. Mamet, B. (1991): Carboniferous calcareous algae.—In:Riding, R. (ed.): Calcareous algae and Stromatolites.—370–451, Berlin (Springer)Google Scholar
  41. Mamet, B. &Roux A. (1975): Dasycladacées, dévoniennes et Carbonifères de la Tethys Occidentale.—Revista Espanola de Paleontologia,7/2, 245–295, MadridGoogle Scholar
  42. Miall, A. D. (1992): Exxon global cycle hart: An event for every occasion?.—Geology,20, 787–790, BoulderCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miall, A.D. (1994): Sequence stratigraphy and chronostratigraphy: problems of definition and precision in correlation, and their implications for global eustasy.—Geoscience Canada (Paleoscene 16.),21, 1–26, St John'sGoogle Scholar
  44. Miall, A.D. (1997): The Geology of stratigraphic sequences.—433 p. erlin, Meidelberg, New York (Springer)Google Scholar
  45. Miklucho-Maklay, A.D., Rauzer-Chernoussova, D.M., &Rozovskaya, S.E. (1959): Fusulinida.—In:Orlov, Ju.A. (ed.): Osnovy paleontologii; prosteischie.—Akad. Nauk SSSR, 201–215, MoskvaGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitchum, R.M., Jr., Vail, P.R., & Thompson, S., III (1977): Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, Part 2: The depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphic analysis.—In:Payton, C.E. (ed.): Seismic stratigraphy-Applications to hydrocarbon exploration.—American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir,26, 53–81, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  47. Nemyrovska, T.I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. &Alekseev, A. (1999): On Moscovian (Late Carboniferous) conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine.—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,214, 169–194, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  48. Pasini, M. (1963): Alcuni Fusulinida della serie del Monte Auernig (Alpi Carniche) e loro significato stratigrafico.—Riv. Ital. Paleont.,69/3, 337–382, 6 Taf., MilanoGoogle Scholar
  49. Putrja, F.S. (1948):Protriticites- novyi rod fuzulinid.—Trudy LGO, paleont. ser.,1, 89–96, 1 pl, L'vovGoogle Scholar
  50. Rácz, L. G. (1964): Carboniferous calcareous algae and their associations in the San Emiliano and Lois-Ciguera formations (prov León, NW Spain).—Leidse Geologische Mededelingen,31, 1–112 LeidenGoogle Scholar
  51. Rauzer-Chernoussova, D. M., Kireeva, G.D., Leontovich, G.E., Gryzlova, N.D., Safonova, T. P. &Chernova, E.I. (1951): srednekamennogulnye fuzulinidy russkoi platformy u sopredelnnych oblastei.—IGN AN SSSR, 380 p., 30 text-figs., 58 pls., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  52. Rauzer-Chernoussova, D. M. &Scherbovich, S. F. (1974): nekotorye voprosy kasimovskogo jarusa v svete izutschenija fuzulinid.—AN SSSR, ser. geol.,6, p. 91–103, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  53. Rjazanov, G.F. (1958a): Morfologija i sistematika rodaProtriticites Putrja, 1948.—Doklady AN SSSR,123 (4), 752–755, 1 pl., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  54. Rjazanov, G.F. (1958b): O rodePseudotriticites Putrja 1940.— doklady AN SSSR,123 (5), 933–936, 1 pl., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  55. Ross, C. A. &Ross, J. R. P. (1995): Foraminiferal zonation of late Paleozoic depositional sequences.—Marine Micropaleontology,26, 469–478, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rozovskaja, S. E. (1950): rodTriticites, ego razvitie i stratigrafitscheskoe zhatschenie.—Trudy Paleont. Inst., Akad. Nauk. SSSR,26, 1–80, 10 pl., Moscow.Google Scholar
  57. Samankassou, E. (1997): Muster und Kontrollfaktoren der zyklischen Sedimentation im Jungpaläozoikum (Oberkarbon-Unterperm) der Karnischen Alpen, Österreich: Eine integrierte Untersuchung.—unpubl., PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 397 p., ErlangenGoogle Scholar
  58. Schaub, H. (1951): Stratigraphie und Micropaläontologie des Schlierenflysch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der paleocaenen und untereocaenen Nummuliten und Assilinen.— Schweiz. Pal. Abh.,68, BaselGoogle Scholar
  59. Schönlaub, H.P. (1991): Vom Urknall zum Gailtal. 500 Millionen Jahre Erdgeschichte in der Karnischen Region.—3rd. Edition, 168 p., 103 figs., 29 pl., 4 geol. maps. Hermagor (Geologische B.-A. Wien)Google Scholar
  60. Selli, R. (1963): Schema geologico delle Alpi Carniche e Giulie occidentali.—Giorn. Geol.,30 (2), 1–121, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  61. Skinner, J. W. & Wilde, G. L. (1954): Fusulinid wall structure.—J. Paleont.,28 (4), 7 pls., Tulsa.Google Scholar
  62. Soreghan, G. S. &Giles, K. A. (1999): Amplitudes of Late Pennsylvanian glacioeustasy.—Geology,27, 255–258, BoulderCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Staff, v. H. (1912): Monographie der Fusulinen (Geplant und begonnen von E. Schellwien†). Teil III: Die Fusulinen (Schellwienien) Nordamerikas.—Palaeontographica,59, 157–191, pl., 15–20, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  64. Thompson, M. L. (1948): Studies of American fusulinids.—Kansas Univ., Paleont. Contrib., Protozoa Art.1, 184, p., 38 pls., KansasGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Ginkel, A. C. & Villa, E. (1996): Palaeontological data of the San Emiliano Formation (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain) and their significance in the Carboniferous chronostratigraphy.— Geobios,29/1Google Scholar
  66. Van Ginkel, A. C. &Villa, E. (1999): Late fusulinellid and early schwagerinid foraminifera: relationships and occurrences in the Las Llacerias section (Moskovian/Kasimovian), Cantabrian Mountains, Spain.—Jour. Foram. Research,29/3, p. 263–290, 6 pls., 4 figs., CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Venturini, C. (1989): Bombaso Formation: The basal clastic unit of the late orogenic Hercynian sequence in the Carnic Alps.—In:Sassi, F. P. & Bourrouilh, R. (eds.): Newsletter, IGCP project no. 5,7, 101–103.Google Scholar
  68. Venturini, C. (1990): Geologia delle Alpi Carniche centro-orientali.— Comune di Udine,36, 217 p., 210 figs., UdineGoogle Scholar
  69. Villa, E. (1995): Fusulinaceous carboniferos del este de Asturias (N de España).—Biostratigraphie du Paleozoïque13, 1–261, 16 figs., 1 tab., 36 pl., LyonGoogle Scholar
  70. Villa, E. O., Alekseev, A. S., Barskov, I. S., Coquel, P., Davydov, V. I., Ginkel, A. C., van, Goreva, N. V., Isakova, T. N., Kabanov, P. B., Kononova, L. I., Lazarev, S. S., Lebedev, O. A., Makhlina, M. K., Mamet, B., Martinez-Chacon, M. L., Mendez, C., Rodrigues-Gonzalez R. M., Rodriguez, S., Sanchez De Posada, L. C. & Shkolin, A., V. (1997): Palaeontological analysis and comparison of the Moscovian/Kasimovian boundary beds in the Moscow Basin (Russia) and in the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain).—Proceedings of the XIII International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian, Krakow, 1995, v. 1, 173–185Google Scholar
  71. Villa E., Davydov, V. I., Konovalova, M. V. &Remizova, S. (1993): Studies on the base of theProtriticites zone. A report on SCCS Project Group 5.—Ann. Soc. geol. Belgique,116/2, 323–331, BruesselGoogle Scholar
  72. Villa, E., Dzhenchuraeva, A., Forke, H., & Ueno, K. (1999): Late Carboniferous Fusulinacean faunas, western Paleotethyan realm: provincialism and paleobiogeographic implications.— XIV ICCP, Programme with Abstracts, 149, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  73. Villa, E. &Martinez-Garcia, E. (1989): El Carbonifero Superior marino de Dobros (Picos de Europa, Asturias, NW de Espana).— Trabajos de Geologia, Univ. Oviedo,18, 77–93, MadridGoogle Scholar
  74. Villa, E. & Van Ginkel, A. C. (1997): Early schwagerinids and accompanying fusulinid genera from the Kasimovian of the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain).—In:Ross, C. A., Ross, J. R. P. & Brenckle, P. L. (eds.): Late Paleozoic Foraminifera; their biostratigraphy, evolution and paleoecology; and the Mid-Carboniferous boundary.—Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, spec. pub.36, 155–158, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Yang, X. &Zheng, H. (1994): The spirotheca of the foraminiferQuasifusulina.—Lethaia,21, 319–325, 8 text-figs., OsloGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhou, Zhi-cheng &E. Flügel (1986): Carbonate ramp deposition: Middle to Upper Carboniferous microfacies of Eastern Anhui and Southern Jiangsu, China.—Facies,14, 201–234, ErlangenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut für Palaentologie, Universitat Erlangen 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger C. Forke
    • 1
  • Elias Samankassou
    • 2
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut SeckenbergFrankfurt/M.
  2. 2.Institut für PaläontologieUniversität ErlangenErlangen

Personalised recommendations