Self instruction using microteaching and videotape feedback during an in-service education course for teachers of harvard project physics

Allen, D.W. and Ryan, K.A. (1969).Microteaching, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Berliner, D.C. (1969).Microteaching and the Technical Skills Approach to Teacher Training. Technical Report No. 8, Standford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar

Borg, W.R.et al. (1968a).The Minicourse: Rationale and Uses in the Inservice Education of Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Borg, W.R.et al. (1968b).The Minicourse: Changing Teacher Behaviour Through Microteaching, Unpublished Manuscript, Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar

Clause, K.E. (1969).Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on Questioning Skills. Technical Report No. 6, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar

Davis, O.L. and Tinsley, D.C. (1967). “Cognitive Objectives Revealed by Classroom Questions Asked by Social Studies Student Teachers”. In Hyman, Ronald T. (ed.), (1968),Teaching: Vantage Points for Study, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar

Evans, Thomas P.A. (1969). “A Category System for Teacher Behaviours”,American Biology Teacher, 31, 221–26, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Furst, Norma and Honigman, Fred. K. (1969).A Study of Pupil-Teacher Interaction in Experimental Communications Courses Compared with Traditional Junior High School Classes. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, Temple University, College of Education, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Gallagher, James J. (1966).Teacher Variation in Concept Presentation in BSCS Curriculum Program. Urbana, Institute for Research on Conceptional Children, Univ. of Ill., cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Gallagher, James J. (1968).Analyses of Teacher Classroom Strategies Associated with Student Cognitive and Affective Performance, Cooperative Research Project No. 3325, (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Harris, Albert J. and Serwer, B. (1966).Comparison of Reading Approaches in First Grade Teaching with Disadvantaged Children. Cooperative Research Project No. 2677, New York: City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Harris, Albert J.et al. (1968).A Continuation of the CRAFT Project: Comparing Reading Approaches with Disadvantaged Negro Children in Primary Grades, Cooperative Research Project No. 5-0570-2-12-1. New York: Division of Teacher Education of the City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res. 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Hays, William Lee (1963).Statistics for Psychologists, pp. 462–489, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Hough, John and Ober, Richard (1967). “The Effects of Training in Interaction Analyses on the Verbal Teaching Behaviour of Pre-Service Teachers,” InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.) Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Hunter, Elizabeth (1969). “Talking in First Grade Classrooms”,Urban Review, 4, 39–43, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40. No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurd, Paul de H. (1966). “Teacher Preparation in Biology: Programs, Plans, Progress”,Newsletter, 28, B.S.C.S.Google Scholar

Kirk, Jeffrey (1967). “Elementary School Student Teachers and Interaction Analyses”, InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.), Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Koran, J.J. (1969). “Two paradigms for the Training of Science Teachers using Videotape Technology and Simulated Conditions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, F.J. and Allen, D.W. (1967).Training Effects of Feedback and Modeling Procedures on Teaching Performance. Technical Report No. 3, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar

Orme, M.E.J. (1966).The Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on the Acquisition of a Complex Teaching Strategy. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, No. 67-4417.Google Scholar

Parakh, Jal S. (1967). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in High School Biology Classes: Part II. Description and Analysis”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 5, 183–92, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parakh, Jal S. (1968). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in BSCS Yellow Version Biology Classes”,American Biology Teacher, 30, 841–48, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar

Perkes, Victor A. (1967). “Junior High School Teacher Preparation, Teacher Behaviours, and Student Achievement”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Rosenshine, Barak (1969). “Teaching Behaviours Related to Pupil Achievement”,Classroom Interaction Newsletter, 5, No. 1, 4–17.Google Scholar

Rosenshine, Barak (1970). “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thile, C. L. (1954). “Fostering Discovery with Children”,Arithmetic Teacher, 6, February.Google Scholar

Wilson, John H. (1969). “The ‘New’ Science Teachers are asking More and Better Questions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winer, B.J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, p. 208, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar