Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 79–90 | Cite as

Self instruction using microteaching and videotape feedback during an in-service education course for teachers of harvard project physics

  • J. Rentoul
Micro-teaching and Interaction Studies
  • 74 Downloads

Keywords

Science Teacher Classroom Instruction Teaching Skill American EDucational Research Association Teacher Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, D.W. and Ryan, K.A. (1969).Microteaching, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Berliner, D.C. (1969).Microteaching and the Technical Skills Approach to Teacher Training. Technical Report No. 8, Standford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar
  3. Borg, W.R.et al. (1968a).The Minicourse: Rationale and Uses in the Inservice Education of Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Borg, W.R.et al. (1968b).The Minicourse: Changing Teacher Behaviour Through Microteaching, Unpublished Manuscript, Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  5. Clause, K.E. (1969).Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on Questioning Skills. Technical Report No. 6, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, O.L. and Tinsley, D.C. (1967). “Cognitive Objectives Revealed by Classroom Questions Asked by Social Studies Student Teachers”. In Hyman, Ronald T. (ed.), (1968),Teaching: Vantage Points for Study, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, Thomas P.A. (1969). “A Category System for Teacher Behaviours”,American Biology Teacher, 31, 221–26, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  8. Furst, Norma and Honigman, Fred. K. (1969).A Study of Pupil-Teacher Interaction in Experimental Communications Courses Compared with Traditional Junior High School Classes. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, Temple University, College of Education, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  9. Gallagher, James J. (1966).Teacher Variation in Concept Presentation in BSCS Curriculum Program. Urbana, Institute for Research on Conceptional Children, Univ. of Ill., cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  10. Gallagher, James J. (1968).Analyses of Teacher Classroom Strategies Associated with Student Cognitive and Affective Performance, Cooperative Research Project No. 3325, (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, Albert J. and Serwer, B. (1966).Comparison of Reading Approaches in First Grade Teaching with Disadvantaged Children. Cooperative Research Project No. 2677, New York: City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, Albert J.et al. (1968).A Continuation of the CRAFT Project: Comparing Reading Approaches with Disadvantaged Negro Children in Primary Grades, Cooperative Research Project No. 5-0570-2-12-1. New York: Division of Teacher Education of the City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res. 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  13. Hays, William Lee (1963).Statistics for Psychologists, pp. 462–489, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  14. Hough, John and Ober, Richard (1967). “The Effects of Training in Interaction Analyses on the Verbal Teaching Behaviour of Pre-Service Teachers,” InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.) Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, Elizabeth (1969). “Talking in First Grade Classrooms”,Urban Review, 4, 39–43, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40. No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurd, Paul de H. (1966). “Teacher Preparation in Biology: Programs, Plans, Progress”,Newsletter, 28, B.S.C.S.Google Scholar
  17. Kirk, Jeffrey (1967). “Elementary School Student Teachers and Interaction Analyses”, InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.), Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Koran, J.J. (1969). “Two paradigms for the Training of Science Teachers using Videotape Technology and Simulated Conditions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonald, F.J. and Allen, D.W. (1967).Training Effects of Feedback and Modeling Procedures on Teaching Performance. Technical Report No. 3, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar
  20. Orme, M.E.J. (1966).The Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on the Acquisition of a Complex Teaching Strategy. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, No. 67-4417.Google Scholar
  21. Parakh, Jal S. (1967). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in High School Biology Classes: Part II. Description and Analysis”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 5, 183–92, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parakh, Jal S. (1968). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in BSCS Yellow Version Biology Classes”,American Biology Teacher, 30, 841–48, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.Google Scholar
  23. Perkes, Victor A. (1967). “Junior High School Teacher Preparation, Teacher Behaviours, and Student Achievement”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenshine, Barak (1969). “Teaching Behaviours Related to Pupil Achievement”,Classroom Interaction Newsletter, 5, No. 1, 4–17.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenshine, Barak (1970). “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thile, C. L. (1954). “Fostering Discovery with Children”,Arithmetic Teacher, 6, February.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, John H. (1969). “The ‘New’ Science Teachers are asking More and Better Questions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winer, B.J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, p. 208, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Science Research Association 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Rentoul

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations