, 40:215 | Cite as

Implications of small scale variation in ecological conditions for the diet and density of red colobus monkeys

  • Colin A. Chapman
  • Lauren J. Chapman


In this 3-year investigation we documented patterns of density, diet, and activity of red colobus monkeys (Procolobus tephrosceles) in six areas in or near Kibale National Park, Uganda and related these patterns to availability of food resources. There were large differences in the density and behavior of the red colobus among the sites. For example, the red colobus at one site with a diverse plant community of more than 61 tree species, had a diet that included at least 42 species. In contrast, at a second site red colobus spent 92% of their feeding time eating from one species that dominated the tree community. The density of important red colobus food trees varied among sites from 32 trees/ha to 204 trees/ha, and red colobus density ranged from 0.70 groups/km2 to 7.41 groups/km2. Among sites, red colobus density was related to the cumulative DBH of important food trees, when one apparently anomalous site was excluded, and populations with more plant species in their diets tended to be those that were found at higher densities. Activity budgets of the red colobus populations varied markedly among sites. For example, feeding time ranged among sites from 29 to 55%, and traveling varied from 5 to 20%. When faced with increased foraging demands, red colobus reduced the time spent resting, while the time spent socializing remained fairly constant. Comparative socioecological studies typically contrast species separated by large geographical distances to ensure there is sufficient variation in the environment to detect behavioral responses. The marked differences in ecological conditions and red colobus behavior we documented over short geographical distances, suggests that small-scale contrasts are a useful tool to examine ecological determinants of behavior and community structure.

Key Words

Procolobus tephrosceles Population regulation Kibale National Park Foraging Community structure Activity budgets 


  1. Altmann, J. 1980.Baboon Mothers and Infants. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, J.;Altmann, S. A.;Hausfater, G.;McCuskey, S. A. 1977. Life history of yellow baboons: physical development, reproductive parameters, and infant mortality.Primates, 18: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann, S. A. 1974. Baboons, space, time, and energy.Amer. Zool., 14: 221–248.Google Scholar
  4. Altmann, S. A.;Altmann, J. 1990.Baboon Ecology: African Field Research. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. M.;May, R. M. 1979. Population biology of infectious diseases.Nature, 271: 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baranga, D. 1982. Nutrient composition and food preferences of colobus monkeys in Kibale Forest, Uganda.Afr. J. Ecol., 20: 113–121.Google Scholar
  7. Bourlière, F. 1985. Primate communities: their structure and role in tropical ecosystems.Int. J. Primatol., 6: 1–26.Google Scholar
  8. Bronikowski, A. M.;Altmann, J. 1996. Foraging in a variable environment: weather patterns and the behavioral ecology of baboons.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 39: 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckland, S. T.;Anderson, D. R.;Burnham, K. P.;Laake, J. L. 1993.Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  10. Burnham, K. P.; Anderson, D. R.; Laake, J. L. 1980. Estimation of density from line-transect sampling of biological populations.Wildl. Monogr., 72.Google Scholar
  11. Butynski, T. M. 1990. Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and lowdensity subpopulations.Ecol. Monogr., 60: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cant, J. G. H. 1980. What limits primates?Primates, 21: 538–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman, C. A.1988. Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of neotropical primates.Primates, 29: 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman, C. A.;Chapman, L. J. 1997. Forest Regeneration in logged and unlogged forests of Kibale National Park, Uganda.Biotropica, 29: 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, C. A.;Chapman, L. J.;Wrangham, R.;Isabirye-Basuta, G.;Ben-David, K. 1997. Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest.Afr. J. Ecol., 35: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman, C. A.;Fedigan, L. M. 1990. Dietary differences between neighboring cebus monkey groups: local tradition or responses to food availability?Folia Primatol., 54: 177–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapman, C. A.;Fedigan, L. M.;Fedigan, L. 1988. A comparison of transect methods of estimating population density of Costa Rican primates.Brenesia, 30: 67–80.Google Scholar
  18. Chapman, C. A.;Wrangham, R. W.;Chapman, L. J. 1995. Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 36: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock, T. T.;Harvey, P. H. 1977. Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool., 183: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collias, N.;Southwick, C. 1952. A field study of population density and social organization in howling monkeys.Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 96: 143–156.Google Scholar
  21. Crook, J. H. 1970. The socio-ecology of primates. In:Social Behaviour in Birds and Mammals,Crook,J. H. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 103–166.Google Scholar
  22. Davies, G. A. 1994. Colobine populations. In:Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution,Davies,A. G.;Oates,J. F. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 285–310.Google Scholar
  23. Dawkins, R.;Dawkins, M. S. 1973. Decisions and the uncertainty of behaviour.Behaviour, 45: 83–103.Google Scholar
  24. Decker, B. S. 1989. Effects of habitat disturbance on the behavioral ecology and demographics of the Tana River colobus (Colobus badius rufomitratus). Ph.D. diss., Emory Univ., Atlanta.Google Scholar
  25. Dittus, W. P. J. 1977. The social regulation of population density and age-sex distribution in the toque monkey.Behaviour, 63: 281–322.Google Scholar
  26. Dunbar, R. I. M.;Dunbar, P. 1988. Maternal time budgets of gelada baboons.Anim. Behav., 36: 970–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenberg, J. F.;Muckenhirn, N. A.;Rudran, R. 1972. The relationship between ecology and social structure in primates.Science, 176: 863–874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Foster, R. B. 1982. A seasonal rhythm of fruitfall on Barro Colorado Island. In:The Ecology of Tropical Forests,Leigh,E. G.;Rand,A. S.;Windsor,D. M. (eds.), Smithsonian Instit. Press. Washington, D.C., pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
  29. Freeland, W. 1977. The dynamics of primate parasites Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  30. Galat, G.;Galat-Luong, A. 1985. La communauté de primates diurnes de la forêt de Taï, Côte d'Ivoire.Revue d'Ecologia (Terre et Vie), 40: 3–32.Google Scholar
  31. Ganzhorn, J. U. 1992. Leaf chemistry and the biomass of folivorous primates in tropical forests: test of a hypothesis.Oecologia, 91: 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gautier-Hion, A. 1980. Seasonal variation of diet related to species and sex in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghiglieri, M. P. 1979. The socioecology of chimpanzees in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  34. Ghiglieri, M. P. 1984.The Chimpanzees of Kibale Forest. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Kasenene, J. M. 1987. The influence of mechanized selective logging, felling intensity and gap-size on the regeneration of a tropical moist forest in the Kibale Forest Reserve, Uganda. Ph.D. diss., Michigan State Univ., Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Kay, R. F.;Madden, R. H.;van Schaik, C.;Higdon, D. 1997. Primate species richness is determined by plant productivity: implications for conservation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 94: 13023–13027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelker, G. H. 1945. Measurement and interpretation of forces that determine populations of managed deer. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  38. Kingston, B. 1967. Working plan for Kibale and Itware Central Forest Reserves. Uganda Forest Dept., Entebbe, Uganda.Google Scholar
  39. Kummer, H. 1971.Primate Societies. Aldine Atherton, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Lehner, P. N. 1996.Handbook of Ethological Methods. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  41. Maisels, F.;Gautier-Hion, A.;Gautier, J. P. 1994. Diets of two sympatric colobines in Zaire: more evidence of seed-eating in forests on poor soils.Int. J. Primatol., 15: 681–701.Google Scholar
  42. Marsh, C. W. 1986. A resurvey of Tana primates and their forest habitat.Primate Conserv., 7: 72–81.Google Scholar
  43. McKey, D. B. 1978. Sofls, vegetation, and seed-eating by black colobus monkeys. In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,Montgomery,G. G. (ed.), Smithsonian Instit. Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 423–437.Google Scholar
  44. McKey, D. B.;Gartlan, J. S.;Waterman, P. G.;Choo, C. M. 1981. Food selection by black colobus monkeys (Colobus satanas) in relation to plant chemistry.Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 16: 115–146.Google Scholar
  45. Milton, K. 1982. Dietary quality and demographic regulation in a howler monkey population. In:The Ecology of a Tropical Forest,Leigh,E. G.;Rand,A. S.;Windsor,D. M. (eds.), Smithsonian Instit. Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 273–289.Google Scholar
  46. Milton, K. 1990. Annual mortality patterns of a mammal community in central Panama.J. Trop. Ecol., 6: 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milton, K. 1996. Effects of bot fly (Alouattamyia baeri) parasitism on a free-ranging howler (Alouatta palliata) population in Panama.J. Zool. Lond., 239: 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. National Research Council. 1981.Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  49. Oates, J. F. 1994. The natural history of African colobines. In:Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution,Davies,A. G.;Oates,J. F. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 75–128.Google Scholar
  50. Oates, J. F.;Whitesides, G. H.;Davies, A. G.;Waterman, P. G.;Green, S. M.;Dasilva, G. L.;Mole, S. 1990. Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass: new evidence from West Africa.Ecology, 71: 328–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Osmaston, H. A. 1959.Working Plan for the Kibale and Itwara Forests. Uganda Forest Dept., Entebbe, Uganda.Google Scholar
  52. Post, D. G. 1981. Activity patterns of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) in the Amboseli National Park, Kenya.Anim. Behav., 29: 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raemaekers, J. 1980. Causes of variation between months in the distance traveled daily by gibbons.Folia Primatol., 34: 46–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reed, K. E.;Fleagle, J. G. 1995. Geographic and climatic control of primate diversity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 92: 7874–7876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott, M. E. 1988. The impact of infection and disease on animal populations: implications for conservation biology.Conserv. Biol., 2: 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skorupa, J. P. 1988. The effect of selective timber harvesting on rain-forest primates in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Ph.D. diss., Univ. of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  57. Struhsaker, T. T. 1973. A recensus of vervet monkeys in the Masai-Amboseli Game Reserve, Kenya.Ecology, 54: 930–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Struhsaker, T. T. 1975.The Red Colobus Monkey, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  59. Struhsaker, T. T. 1976. A further decline in numbers of Amboseli vervet monkeys.Biotropica, 8: 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Struhsaker, T. T. 1997.Ecology of an African Rain Forest: Logging in Kibale and the Conflict Between Conservation and Exploitation. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  61. Struhsaker, T. T.;Oates, J. F. 1975. Comparison of the behavior and ecology of red colobus and black-and-white colobus monkeys in Uganda: a summary. In:Socio-ecology and Psychology of Primates,Tuttle,R. H. (ed.), Mouton, The Hague, pp. 103–123.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, S. C. 1991. Population densities and patterns of habitat use among anthropoid primates of the Ituri Forest, Zaire.Biotropica, 23: 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wagner, S. S.;Altmann, S. A. 1973. What time do the baboons come down from the trees?: an estimation problem.Biometrics, 29: 623–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waser, P. M. 1974. Intergroup interaction in a forest monkey: the mangabeyCercocebus albigena. Ph.D. diss., Rockefeller Univ., New York.Google Scholar
  65. Waterman, P. G.;Ross, J. A. M.;Bennett, E. L.;Davies, A. G. 1988. A comparison of the floristics and leaf chemistry of the tree flora in two Malaysian rain forest and the influence of leaf chemistry on populations of colobine monkeys in the Old World.Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 34: 1–32.Google Scholar
  66. Weins, J. A. 1977. On competition and variable environments.Amer. Sci., 65: 590–597.Google Scholar
  67. Whitesides, G. H.;Oates, J. F.;Green, S. M.;Kluberdanz, R. P. 1988. Estimating primate densities from transects in a West African rainforest: a comparison of techniques.J. Anim. Ecol., 57: 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wing, L. D.; Buss, I. O. 1970. Elephants and forest.Wildl. Monogr., 19.Google Scholar
  69. Wrangham, R. W.;Gittleman, J.;Chapman, C. A. 1993. Constraints on group size in primates and carnivores: population density and day-range as assays of exploitation competition.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 32: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin A. Chapman
    • 1
  • Lauren J. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaFloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations