Primates

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 47–59 | Cite as

The value of grooming to female primates

  • S. Peter Henazi
  • Louise Barrett
Article

Abstract

Current socioecological models suggest that the structure of female-bonded primate groups is predicated on the need for coalitionary support in competitive interactions. Social grooming is thought to be the means by which females ensure support from other individuals, either by the direct exchange of grooming for aid or by using grooming as a means of strengthening social bonds. Since these relationships are valuable, they must be regularly serviced and must be repaired if they become damaged. We question this position and show that empirical evidence to support these theoretical arguments is lacking. We then go on to present a new framework in which the inconsistencies regarding grooming and relationship negotiation are interpreted in the context of individual decision-making processes. In this framework, primate groups represent biological markets in which individuals either trade grooming in a reciprocal manner for the direct benefits that grooming itself offers, or exchange it for tolerance by more powerful animals. A number of testable predictions are derived from this hypotheses. The need for socioecological studies to focus on the dynamics of individual relationships rather than using summary measures is emphasized since only a detailed knowledge of serial interaction will provide the key to understanding the complexities of individual decision-making processes.

Key Words

Relationships Grooming Interchange Reciprocity Biological markets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aureli, F.;van Schaik, C.P.;van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. 1989. Functional aspects of reconciliation among captive long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Amer. J. Primatol., 19: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, L.; Henzi, S. P.; Weingrill, A.; Lycett, J. E.; Hill, R. A. in press. Market forces predict grooming reciprocity among female baboons.Proc. Roy. Soc., Lond. B. Google Scholar
  3. Barton, R. A. 1985. Grooming site preferences in primates and their functional implications.Int. J. Primatol., 6: 519–532.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, I. 1981. Dominance: the baby and the bathwater.Behav. Brain Sci., 3: 419–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapais, B. 1988a. Rank maintenance in female Japanese macaques: experimental evidence for social dependency.Behaviour, 104: 41–59.Google Scholar
  6. Chapais, B. 1988b. Experimental matrilineal inheritance of rank in female Japanese macques.Anim. Behav., 36: 1025–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapais, B.;Girard, M.;Primi, G. 1991. Non-kin alliances and the stability of matrilineal dominance relations in Japanese macaques.Anim. Behav., 41: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheney, D. L. 1977. The acquisition of rank and the development of reciprocal alliances among freeranging immature baboons.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2: 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheney, D. L. 1992. Intragroup cohesion and intergroup hostility: the relation between grooming distributions and intergroup competition among female primates.Behav. Ecol., 3: 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheney, D. L.;Seyfarth, R. M. 1990.How Monkeys See the World. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1974. Primate social organization and ecology.Nature, 250: 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colvin, J. 1983. Description of sibling and peer relationships among immature male rhesus monkeys. In.Primate Social Relationships: An Integrated Approach,Hinde,R. A. (ed.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 20–27.Google Scholar
  13. Connor, R. C. 1995. Impala allogrooming and the parcelling model of reciprocity.Anim. Behav., 49: 528–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crook, J. H.;Gartlan, J. S. 1966. Evolution of primate societies.Nature, 210: 1200–1203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Datta, S. 1983. Relative power and the acquisition of rank. In:Primate Social Relationships,Hinde,R. (ed.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
  16. Di Bitetti, M. S. 1997. Evidence for an important social role of grooming in a platyrrhine primate.Anim. Behav., 54: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1984a.Reproductive Decisions: An Economic Analysis of Gelada Baboon Social Strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, Jersey.Google Scholar
  18. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1984b. Infant-use by male gelada in agonistic contexts: agonistic buffering, progeny protection or soliciting support?Primates, 25: 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1988.Primate Social Systems. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  20. Dunbar, R. I. M.;Sharman, M. J. 1984. Is social grooming altruistic?Z. Tierpsychol., 64:163–173.Google Scholar
  21. Eisenberg, J. F.;Muckenhirn, N. A.;Rudran, R. 1972. The relation between ecology and social structure in primates.Science, 176: 863–874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fairbanks, L. A. 1980. Relationships among adult females in captive vervet monkeys: testing a model of rank-related attractiveness.Anim. Behav., 28: 853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harcourt, A. 1988. Alliances in contests and social intelligence. In:Machiavellian Intelligence,Byrne,R. W.;Whiten,A. (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 132–152.Google Scholar
  24. Harcourt, A. 1992. Coalitions and alliances: are primates more complex than non-primates? In:Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals,Harcourt,A. H.;de Waal,F. B. M. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 445–472.Google Scholar
  25. Harcourt, A. H.;Stewart, K. J. 1987. The influence of help in contests on dominance rank in primates: hints from gorillas.Anim. Behav., 35: 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hemelrijk, C. K. 1990. A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at the group level.J. Theor. Biol., 143: 405–420.Google Scholar
  27. Hemelrijk, C. K.;Ek, A. 1991. Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and “support” in captive chimpanzees.Anim. Behav., 41: 923–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henzi, S. P. 1982. Aspects of social organization and visual communication in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  29. Henzi, S. P.;Lycett, J. E.;Weingrill, A. 1997. Cohort size and the allocation of social effort by female mountain baboons.Anim. Behav., 54: 1235–1243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M.;van Schaik, C. P. 1992. Co-operation in competition: the ecology of primate bonds. In:Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals,Harcourt,A. H.;de Waal,F. B. M. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 357–390.Google Scholar
  31. Horrocks, J.;Hunte, W. 1983. Maternal rank and offspring rank in vervet monkeys: an appraisal of the mechanisms of rank acquisition.Anim. Behav., 31: 772–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isbell, L. A. 1991. Contest and scramble competition: patterns of female aggression and ranging behavior among primates.Behav. Ecol., 2: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janson, C. H. 1988. Food competition in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): quantitative effects of group size and tree productivity.Behaviour, 105: 53–76.Google Scholar
  34. Keverne, E. B.;Martensz, N.;Tuite, B. 1989. Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships.Psychoneuroendocrinol., 14: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kummer, H. 1978. On the value of social relationships to non-human primates: a heuristic scheme.Soc. Sci. Inform., 12: 687–705.Google Scholar
  36. Linn, G. S.;Mase, D.;Lafrancois, D.;O'Keefe, R. T.;Lifshitz, K. 1995. Social and menstrual cycle phase influences on the behaviour of group-housedCebus apella.Amer. J. Primatol., 35: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lycett, J. E.;Henzi, S. P.;Barrett, L. 1998. Maternal investment in mountain baboons and the hypothesis of reduced care.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muroyama, Y. 1991. Mutual reciprocity of grooming in female Japanese macaques (M. fuscata).Behaviour, 119: 161–170.Google Scholar
  39. Muroyama, Y. 1994. Exchange of grooming for allomothering in female patas monkeys.Behaviour, 128: 103–119.Google Scholar
  40. Noë, R. 1986. Lasting alliances among adult male savannah baboons. In:Primate Ontogeny, Cognition and Social Behaviour,Else,J. G.;Lee,P. C. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 381–392.Google Scholar
  41. Noë, R.;Hammerstein, P. 1995. Biological markets.Tree, 10: 336–340.Google Scholar
  42. O'Brien, T. G. 1991. Female-male social interactions in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys: benefits and costs of group living.Anim. Behav., 41: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O'Brien, T. G. 1993a. Allogrooming behaviour among female wedge-capped capuchin monkeys.Anim. Behav., 46: 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O'Brien, T. G. 1993b. Asymmetries in grooming interaction between juvenile and adult female wedgecapped capuchin monkeys.Anim. Behav., 46: 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Packer, C.;Pusey, A. E. 1983. Co-operation and competition within coalitions of female lions: kin selection or game theory.Science, 221: 1191–1193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Parr, L. A.;Matheson, M. D.;Bernstein, I. S.;de Waal, F. B. M. 1997. Grooming down the hierarchy: allogrooming in captive brown capuchin monkeys,Cebus apella.Anim. Behav., 54: 361–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perry, S. 1996. Female-female social relationships in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys,Cebus capucinus.Amer. J. Primatol., 40: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, J. G. 1988. Group size in wedge-capped capuchin monkeysCebus olivaceus and the reproductive success of males and females.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 23: 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ron, T.;Henzi, S. P.;Motro, U. 1994. A new model of ission in primate troops.Anim. Behav., 47: 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ron, T.;Henzi, S. P.;Motro, U. 1996. Do female chacma baboons compete for a safe spatial position in a woodland habitat in Zululand, South Africa?Behaviour, 133: 475–490.Google Scholar
  51. Rowell, T. E.;Wilson, C.;Cords, M. 1991. Reciprocity and partner preference in grooming female blue monkeys.Int. J. Primatol., 12: 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sambrook, T. D.;Whiten, A.;Strum, S. C. 1995. Priority of access and grooming patterns of females in a large and a small troop of olive baboons.Anim. Behav., 50: 1667–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saunders, C. D. 1988. Ecological, social and evolutionary aspects of baboon (Papio cynocephalus) grooming behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell Univ., New York.Google Scholar
  54. van Schaik, C. P. 1989. The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In:Comparative Socioecology: the Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Animals,Standen,V.;Foley,R. A. (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 241–269.Google Scholar
  55. van Schaik, C. P. 1996. Social evolution in primates: the role of ecological factors and male behaviour. In:Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man,Runciman,W. G.;Maynard-Smith,J.;Dunbar,R. I. M. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 9–32.Google Scholar
  56. Seyfarth, R. M. 1977. A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys.J. Theor. Biol., 65: 671–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seyfarth, R. M. 1980. The distribution of grooming and related behaviours among adult female vervet monkeys.Anim. Behav., 28: 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seyfarth, R. M.;Cheney, D. L. 1984. Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys.Nature, 308: 541–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silk, J. 1982. Altruism among femaleMacaca radiata: explanations and analysis of patterns of grooming and coalition formation.Behaviour, 79: 162–168.Google Scholar
  60. Silk, J. 1992. Patterns of intervention in agonistic contests among male bonnet macaques. In:Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Harcourt, A. H.; de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 214–232.Google Scholar
  61. Silk, J.;Samuels, A.;Rodman, P. 1981. The influence of kinship, rank and sex on affiliation and aggression between adult female and immature bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata).Behaviour, 78: 111–133.Google Scholar
  62. Tanaka, I.;Takefushi, H. 1993. Elimination of external parasites (lice) is the primary function of grooming in free-ranging Japanese macaques.Anthropol. Sci., 101: 187–193.Google Scholar
  63. Vehrencamp, S. 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies.Anim. Behav., 31: 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. de Waal, F. B. M. 1989.Peacemaking Among Primates. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  65. de Waal, F. B. M. 1992. Coalitions as part of reciprocal relations in the Arnheim chimpanzee colony. In:Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals,Harcourt,A. H.;de Waal,F. B. M. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 233–258.Google Scholar
  66. de Waal, F. B. M. 1997. The chimpanzee's service economy: food for grooming.Evol. Human Behav., 18: 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. de Waal, F. B. M.;Luttrell, L. M. 1986. The similarity principle underlying social bonding among female rhesus monkeys.Folia Primatol., 46: 215–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Weisbard, C.;Goy, R. W. 1976. Effect of parturition and group composition on competitive drinking order in stumptailed macaques (Macaca arctoides).Folia Primatol., 25: 95–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wrangham, R. W. 1980. An ecological model of female-bonded groups.Behaviour, 75: 262–300.Google Scholar
  70. Wrangham, R. W. 1987. Evolution of social structure. In:Primate Societies,Smuts,B. B.;Cheney,D. L.;Seyfarth,R. M.;Wrangham,R. W.;Struhsaker,T. T. (eds.), The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 282–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Peter Henazi
    • 1
  • Louise Barrett
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of NatalDurbanRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of NatalDurbanRepublic of South Africa
  3. 3.Population Biology Research Group, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland

Personalised recommendations