Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 165–168 | Cite as

Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: Can the areola be preserved?

  • Rache M. SimmonsEmail author
  • Meghan Brennan
  • Paul Christos
  • Valencia King
  • Michael Osborne
Original Articles



Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), which involves the resection of the nipple/areolar complex with the breast parenchyma, improves the aesthetic outcome for breast cancer patients. Most patients undergoing SSM desire reconstruction of the nipple/areolar complex for symmetry. These data explore the possibility of preserving the areola in selected mastectomy patients.


A retrospective analysis of 217 mastectomy patients was conducted to determine the frequency of malignant nipple and/or areola involvement. The association between nipple and/or areola involvement and prognostic factors, including tumor size, stage, nuclear grade, axillary nodal status, and tumor location, was evaluated.


The overall frequency of malignant nipple involvement was 23 of 217 (10.6%). In a subgroup of patients with tumors <2 cm, peripheral tumors, and with two positive nodes or less, the incidence of nipple involvement was 6.7%. When the nipple and areolar involvement were analyzed separately, only 2 of 217 patients had involvement of the areola (0.9%). All patients with areolar involvement had stage 3 breast cancer and were located centrally in the breast.


We conclude from these data that nipple preservation is not a reasonable option for mastectomy patients. However, preservation of the areola with mastectomy in selected patients warrants further study.

Key Words

Areola preservation Skin-sparing mastectomy Nipple involvement Breast reconstruction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Toth BA, Forley BG, Calabria R. Retrospective study of the skin-sparing mastectomy in breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simmons RM, Kersey Fish S, Gayle L, et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with nonskin-sparing mastectomies.Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:676–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TN, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations.Ann Surg 1997;225:570–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:620–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riveradeneira DE, Simmons RM, Kersey Fish S, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence.Cancer J 2000;6:331–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb G, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy.Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areolar involvement in breast cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol 1998;24:15–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perry RG, Cochran TC, Wolfort FG. When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast?Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:535–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinn RH, Barlow JF. Involvement of the nipple and areola by carcinoma of the breast.Arch Surg 1981;116:1139–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kissin MW, Kark AE. Nipple preservation during mastectomy.Br J Surg 1987;74:58–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andersen JA, Gram JB, Pallesen RM. Involvement of the nipple and areola in breast cancer.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:39–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:546–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox CE, Ku NN, Reintgen DS, Greenberg HM, Nicosia SV, Wangensteen S. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.Arch Surg 1991;126:490–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ku NN, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Greenberg HM, Nicosia SV. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.Acta Cytol 1990;35:417–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rache M. Simmons
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Meghan Brennan
    • 5
  • Paul Christos
    • 2
  • Valencia King
    • 3
  • Michael Osborne
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York
  3. 3.Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York
  4. 4.The New York Presbyterian HospitalNew York
  5. 5.Strang Weill Cornell Breast CenterNew York

Personalised recommendations