Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 184–188 | Cite as

Regional variations in histomorphometric bone dynamics from the skeleton of an osteoporotic woman

  • Jan Pødenphant
  • Ulla Engel
Clinical Investigations

Summary

Histomorphometric evaluation of bone formation in an intravital tetracycline-labeled skeleton of a suddenly deceased osteoporotic woman is presented. The 24 skeletal sites investigated displayed substantial regional variations which, for two out of four cortical bone dynamics and all trabecular bone dynamics, were significantly higher than the intraspecimen variation. Poor agreement was found between bone formation in left- and right-sided iliac crest specimens. Furthermore, no agreement was found between trabecular bone formation and amount of hematopoetic marrow. With all the limitations that the study of a single patient involves it is suggested that (1) bone biopsy in individual patients should not be the only basis for therapeutic decisions in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (2) amount of hematopoietic marrow does not seem to influence bone formation; and (3) bone formation in the skeleton display large regional variations, which are larger for the fraction of labeled surfaces than for appositional rate.

Key words

Tetracycline-labeled necropsies Bone turnover Osteoporosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frost HM (1983) Bone histomorphometry: choice of marking agent and labeling schedule. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. pp 37–52Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao DS (1983) Practical approach to bone biopsy. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRS Press, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Villanueva AR (1974) A bone stain for osteoid seams in fresh unembedded mineralized bone. Stain Technol 49:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delling G, Luehmann H, Baron R, Mathews CHE, Olah A (1980) Investigation of intra- and inter-reader reproducibility. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. Third International Workshop pp 419–427Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Visser WJ, Roelofs JMM, Peters JPJ, Lentferink MHF, Duursma SA (1980) Sampling variations in bone histomorphometry. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. Third International Workshop pp 429–434Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Compston JE, Vedi S, Stellon AJ (1986) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in bone histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 30:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melsen F, Melsen B, Mosekilde L (1978) An evaluation of the quantitative parameters applied in bone histology. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 86:63–69Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Vernejoul MC, Kuntz D, Miravet L, Goutallier D, Rychewaert A (1981) Bone histomorphometric reproducibility in normal patients. Calcif Tissue Int 33:369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malluche HH, Meger W, Sherman D, Massry SG (1982) Quantitative bone histology in 84 normal American subjects: micromorphometric analysis and evaluation of variance in iliac bone. Calcif Tissue Int 34:449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whyte MP, Bergfeld MA, Murphy WA, Avioli LV, Teitelbaum SL (1982) Postmenopausal osteoporosis. A heterogenous disorder as assessed by histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone from untreated patients. Am J Med 72:193–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meunier PJ, Sellami S, Briancon D, Edouard C (1981) Histological heterogeneity of apparently idiopathic osteoporosis. In: DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) Osteoporosis. Recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 293–302Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meunier P, Aaron J, Edouard C, Vignon C (1971) Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. Clin Orthop 80:147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heaney RP, Recker RR, Saville PD (1978) Menopausal changes in bone remodelling. J Lab Clin Med 92:964–970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nordin BEC, Aaron J, Speed R, Crilly RG (1981) Bone formation and resorption as the determinants of trabecular bone volume in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet ii:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parfitt AM, Mathews C, Rao D, Frame B, Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR (1981) Impaired osteoblast function in metabolic bone disease. In: Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 321–330Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Pødenphant
    • 1
  • Ulla Engel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Chemistry, Glostrup HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenGlostrupDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Pathology, Glostrup HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenGlostrupDenmark

Personalised recommendations