Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 260–262 | Cite as

Peak trabecular vertebral density: A comparison of adolescent and adult females

  • Vicente Gilsanz
  • Douglas T. Gibbens
  • Michael Carlson
  • M. Ines Boechat
  • Christopher E. Cann
  • Eloy E. Schulz
Rapid Communications

Summary

To determine when spinal bone density reaches its peak, the trabecular vertebral density was assessed, via quantitative computed tomography, among females from two age groups: (1) adolescents (aged 14–19 years; n=24); and (2) young adults (aged 25–35 years; n=24). The adolescent girls had a higher mean trabecular vertebral density (P<0.01), suggesting that spinal density reaches its peak around the time of cessation of longitudinal growth and epiphyseal closure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnston CC, Hui SL, Wiske P (1981) Bone mass at maturity and subsequent rates of loss as determinants of osteoporosis. In: De Luca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS (eds) Osteoporosis: Recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. University Park Press, Baltimore, p 285Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF, Carlson M, Senac MO, Boechat MI, Huang HK, Schulz EE, Libanati CR, Cann CE (1988) Vertebral bone density in children: Effect of puberty. Radiology 166:847–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cann CE (1981) Low dose CT scanning for quantitative spinal mineral analysis. Radiology 140:813–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cann, CE, Genant HK (1980) Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:493–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Genant HK, Cann CE, Pozzi-Mucelli RS, Kanter AS (1983) Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative CT: Clinical feasibility and normative data. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villanueva AR, Sedlin E, Frost HM (1983) Variations in osteoblastic activity with age. Anat Rec 146:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weaver JK, Chalmers J (1966) Cancellous bone; its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. I. Age changes in cancellous bone. J Bone Joint Surg 48A:289Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merz WA, Schenk RK (1970) A quantitative histological study on bone formation in human cancellous bone. Acta Anat 76:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnold JS (1973) Amount of quality of trabecular bone in osteoporotic and vertebral fractures. Clin Endocrinol Metab 2:221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marcus R, Kosen J, Pfefferbaum A, Horning A (1983) Age-related loss of trabecular bone in premenopausal women: A biopsy study. Calcif Tiss Int 35:406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilsanz V, Roe TF, Gibbens DT, Schulz EE, Gonzalez O, Carlson ME Boechat MI (Revision requested) Effect of sex steroids on peak bone density of growing rabbits. Am J Physiol.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cann CE, Ettinger B, Genant HK (1985) Normal subjects versus osteoporotics: No evidence using dual energy computed tomography for disproportionate increase in vertebral marrow fat. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burgess AE, Colborne B, Zoffman E (1987) Vertebral trabecular bone: Comparison of single and dual-energy CT measurements with chemical analysis. J Comp Assist Tomogr 11:506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cummings SR (1987) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures: Selected topics. In: Roche AF, Gussler JD, Redfern DE (eds) Report of the Seventh Ross Conference on medical research. Ross Laboratories, Columbus, p 3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicente Gilsanz
    • 1
  • Douglas T. Gibbens
    • 1
  • Michael Carlson
    • 1
  • M. Ines Boechat
    • 2
  • Christopher E. Cann
    • 3
  • Eloy E. Schulz
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyChildren's Hospital of Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Loma Linda University Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations