Advertisement

Factitial proctitis:

A restudy at the University of Minnesota
  • Lloyd F. Sherman
  • Konald A. Prem
  • N. M. Mensheha
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Summary

The incidence of factitial proctitis and the severity of the lesions have decreased (10 per cent) in the reported group of patients, compared with the previously-studied group at the University of Minnesota Hospitals. The only changes in the treatment have been the methods of application and anchoring the radium with the patient under general anesthesia and copious vaginal packing. The success of treatment of this condition with daily instillations of hydrocortisone retention enemas far surpassed that of treatment with the placebo in our double-blind study, and it was superior to the topical application of steroid in suppositories. Treatment was continued until considerable improvement was evident proctoscopically. The average duration of treatment was two to three months. No intestinal or septal perforation occurred in the study group, nor was any diversionary procedure (colostomy) necessary. However, we feel that close proctoscopic follow-up examinations at monthly intervals are mandatory when this treatment regimen is used.

Keywords

Radium Proctitis Rectovaginal Fistula Intestinal Perforation Cervix Uterus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldridge, A. H.: Intestinal injuries resulting from irradiation treatment of uterine carcinoma. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.44: 833, 1942.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buie, L. A., and G. E. Malmgren: Factitial proctitis: Justifiable lesion observed in patients following irradiation. Int. Clin.3: 68, 1930.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colcock, B. P., and A. Hume: Radiation injury to the sigmoid and rectum. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.108: 306, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooling, C. I.: Irradiation damage to the bowel. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.57: 650, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan, B. J.: Factitial proctitis: O clinical study. Bull. Univ. Minn. Hosp.26: 301, 1955.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKelvey, J. L., K. W. Stenstrom, and J. S. Gillam: Results of an experimental therapy of carcinoma of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.58: 896, 1949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quan, S. H. Q.: Factitial proctitis due to irradiation for cancer of the cervix uteri. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.126: 70, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Randall, L. M., and L. A. Buie: Factitial proctitis. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.45: 505, 1943.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sherman, L. F.: Reevaluation of the factitial proctitis problem. Amer. J. Surg.88: 773, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherman, L. F.: The treatment of ulcerative colitis with hydrocortisone alcohol retention enemas. Minn. Med.48: 605, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, L. M. C., Jr., W. N. Viar, J. M. Donald, and G. W. Colvin: Radiation injury to the rectum and sigmoid colon. Amer. Surg.27: 660, 1961.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strickland, P., and C. Gregory: Rectal dose and rectal damage in the intracavitary treatment of uterine cancer. Acta Radiol. (Stockholm).56: 289, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strockbine, M. F., J. E. Hancock, and G. H. Fletcher: Complications in 831 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated wth 3,000 rads or more whole pelvic irradiation. Amer. J. Roentgen.108: 293, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Todd, T. F.: Rectal ulceration following irradiation treatment of carcinoma of the cervix uteri: Pseudo-carcinoma of the rectum. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.67: 617, 1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J. B. Lippincott Company 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd F. Sherman
    • 1
  • Konald A. Prem
    • 1
  • N. M. Mensheha
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Minnesota School of MedicineMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations