Foundations of Physics

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 845–863 | Cite as

Phase space generalization of the de Broglie-Bohm model

  • Roderick I. Sutherland
Article

Abstract

A generalization of the familiar de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics is formulated, based on relinquishing the momentum relationship p=∇S and allowing a spread of momentum values at each position. The development of this framework also provides a new perspective on the well-known question of joint distributions for quantum mechanics. It is shown that, for an extension of the original model to be physically acceptable and consistent with experiment, it is necessary to impose certain restrictions on the associated joint distribution for particle positions and momenta. These requirements thereby define a new class of possible models. In pursuing this line of reasoning, the main contributions of this paper are (i) to identify the restrictions that must be imposed, (ii) to demonstrate that joint distribution expressions satisfying them do exist, and (iii) to construct a sample model based on one such joint distribution.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Joint Distribution Wigner Distribution Schr6dinger Equation Position Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Bohm,Phys. Rev.,85, 166, 180 (1952).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. de Broglie,Non-Linear Wave Mechanics, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960).MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories (Pergamon, Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Bohm and B. J. HileyThe Undivided Universe (Routledge, London, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. R. Holland,The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge, 1995).MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Madelung,Z. Phys.,40, 332 (1926).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Takabayasi,Prog. Theor. Phys. 8, 143 (1952);9, 187 (1953).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Schönberg,Nuovo Cimento 12, 103 (1954).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Bohm and J.-P. Vigier,Phys. Rev. 96, 208 (1954).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bohm, R. Schiller, and J. TiomnoSuppl. Nuovo Cimento 1, 48 (1955).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Takabayasi,Prog. Theor. Phys.,11, 341 (1954).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Wigner,Phys. Rev.,40, 749 (1932).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Cohen,J. Math. Phys.,7, 781 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Cohen, inFrontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics. G. T. Moore and M. O. Scully, eds., (Plenum, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Cohen and Y. I. Zaparovanny,J. Math. Phys. 21, 794 (1980).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. D. Finch and R. Groblicki,Found. Phys.,14, 549 (1984).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. P. Wigner, inPerspectives in Quantum Theory, W. Yourgrau and A. van der Merwe, eds., (Dover, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. I. Sutherland.J. Math. Phys. 23, 2389 (1982).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner,Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick I. Sutherland
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ScienceUniversity of Western SydneyRichmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations