Phase space generalization of the de Broglie-Bohm model
- 101 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
A generalization of the familiar de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics is formulated, based on relinquishing the momentum relationship p=∇S and allowing a spread of momentum values at each position. The development of this framework also provides a new perspective on the well-known question of joint distributions for quantum mechanics. It is shown that, for an extension of the original model to be physically acceptable and consistent with experiment, it is necessary to impose certain restrictions on the associated joint distribution for particle positions and momenta. These requirements thereby define a new class of possible models. In pursuing this line of reasoning, the main contributions of this paper are (i) to identify the restrictions that must be imposed, (ii) to demonstrate that joint distribution expressions satisfying them do exist, and (iii) to construct a sample model based on one such joint distribution.
Keywords
Quantum Mechanic Joint Distribution Wigner Distribution Schr6dinger Equation Position DistributionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. Bohm,Phys. Rev.,85, 166, 180 (1952).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.L. de Broglie,Non-Linear Wave Mechanics, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories (Pergamon, Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar
- 4.D. Bohm and B. J. HileyThe Undivided Universe (Routledge, London, 1993).Google Scholar
- 5.P. R. Holland,The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge, 1995).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.E. Madelung,Z. Phys.,40, 332 (1926).Google Scholar
- 7.T. Takabayasi,Prog. Theor. Phys. 8, 143 (1952);9, 187 (1953).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. Schönberg,Nuovo Cimento 12, 103 (1954).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.D. Bohm and J.-P. Vigier,Phys. Rev. 96, 208 (1954).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.D. Bohm, R. Schiller, and J. TiomnoSuppl. Nuovo Cimento 1, 48 (1955).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 11.T. Takabayasi,Prog. Theor. Phys.,11, 341 (1954).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 12.E. Wigner,Phys. Rev.,40, 749 (1932).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.L. Cohen,J. Math. Phys.,7, 781 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.L. Cohen, inFrontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics. G. T. Moore and M. O. Scully, eds., (Plenum, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
- 15.L. Cohen and Y. I. Zaparovanny,J. Math. Phys. 21, 794 (1980).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 16.P. D. Finch and R. Groblicki,Found. Phys.,14, 549 (1984).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.E. P. Wigner, inPerspectives in Quantum Theory, W. Yourgrau and A. van der Merwe, eds., (Dover, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
- 18.R. I. Sutherland.J. Math. Phys. 23, 2389 (1982).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner,Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar