Grooming site preferences in female langurs (Presbytis entellus)

  • Carola Borries
Article

Abstract

Factors influencing grooming site preferences in adult female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) were investigated. The females belonged to a free-ranging harem troop (Jodhpur, India) and were observed for 569 hr by focal-female sampling. Decisive factors for grooming site preferences were the following: autogrooming was determined mostly by site accessiblity. Allogrooming was significantly concentrated on parts that are inaccessible to the groomee. Close female kin groomed significantly longer, more frequently, and more precisely at inaccessible body parts. Lower-ranking females were groomed significantly less often and more briefly but also more precisely at inaccessible parts. However, the latter might be due to a lower-ranking subjects desire to face away from the higher-ranking groomer in order to avoid eye contact. The data suggest that the groomee determines the sites being groomed.

Key words

Presbytis entellus autogrooming/allogrooming site preferences kinship dominance 

References

  1. Alexander, R. (1974). The evolution of animal behavior.Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 5: 325–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, R. (1985). Grooming site preferences in primates and their functional implications.Int. J. Primatol. 6: 519–532.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, I. S., Rose, R. M., and Gordon, T. P. (1977). Behavioral and hormonal responses of male rhesus monkeys introduced to females in the breeding and nonbreeding season.Anim. Behav. 25: 609–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boccia, M. L. (1983). A functional analysis of social grooming patterns through direct comparison with self-grooming in rhesus monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 4 399–418.Google Scholar
  6. Boccia, M. L. (1986). Grooming site preferences as a form of tactile communication and their role in the social relations of rhesus monkeys. In Taub, D. M., and King, F. A. (eds.),Current Perspectives in Primate Social Dynamics, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 505–518.Google Scholar
  7. Boccia, M. L. (1989). Comparison of the physical characteristics of grooming in two species of macaques (Macaca nemestrina andM. radiata).J. Comp. Psychol. 103: 177–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boccia, M. L., Rockwood, B., and Novack, M. (1982). The influence of behavioral context and social characteristics on the physical aspects of social grooming in rhesus monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 91–108.Google Scholar
  9. Boccia, M. L., Reite, M., and Laudenslager, M. (1989). On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque.Phys. Behav. 43: 667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borries, C. (1988). Patterns of grandmaternal behaviour in free-ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Hum. Evol. 3: 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borries, C. (1989). Mothers and adult daughters—on kinship in free-ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primate Rep. 25: 10.Google Scholar
  12. Borries, C., Sommer, V., and Srivastava, A. (1991). Dominance, age, and reproductive success in free-ranging female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Int. J. Primatol. 3: 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Borries, C., Sommer, V., and Srivastava, A. (1992). Allogrooming in free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus) (in preparation).Google Scholar
  14. Carpenter, L. R. (1942). Sexual behavior of free ranging rhesus monkeysMacaca mulatta.J. Comp. Psychol. 33: 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coelho, A. M., Turner, S. A., and Bramblett, C. A. (1983). Allogrooming and social status: An assessment of the contributions of female behavior to the social organization of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas).Primates 24: 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixson, A. F., Scruton, D. M., and Herbert, J. (1975). Behaviour of the talapoin monkey (Miopithecus talapoin) studied in groups in the laboratory.J. Zool. 176: 177–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drickamer, L. C. (1976). Quantitative observations of grooming behaviour in free-rangingMacaca mulatta.Primates 17: 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fairbanks, L. A. (1980). Relationships among females in captive vervet monkeys: testing a model of rank-related attractiveness.Anim. Behav. 28: 853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeland, W. J. (1976). Pathogens and the evolution of primate sociality.Biotrop. 8: 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furuya, Y. (1957). Grooming behaviour in the wild Japanese monkeys.Primates 1: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goosen, C. (1987). Social grooming in primates. In Mitchell, G., and Erwin, J. (eds.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2, Part B: Behavior, Cognition and Motivation, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 107–131.Google Scholar
  22. Hutchins, M., and Barash, D. P. (1976). Grooming in primates: Implications for its utilitarian function.Primates 17: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, C. B. (1979). Grooming in the mantled howler monkey,Alouatta palliata, Gray.Primates 20: 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurland, J. A. (1977). Kin selection in the Japanese monkey.Contr. Primatol, 12, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  25. Lindburg, D. G. (1973). Grooming behavior as a regulator of social interactions in rhesus monkeys. In Carpenter, C. R. (ed.),Behavioral Regulators of Behavior in Primates, Buckwell University Press, Lewisburg, Pa., pp. 124–148.Google Scholar
  26. Lopez-Vergara, L., Santillan-Doherty, A. M., Mayagoitia, L., and Mondragon-Ceballos, R. (1989). Self and social grooming in stump-tailed macaques: Effects of kin presence or absence within the group.Behav. Proc. 18: 99–106.Google Scholar
  27. MacKenzie, M., McGrew, W. C., and Charmove, A. S. (1985). Social preferences in stump-tailed macaques (Macaca arctoides): effects of companionship, kinship, and rearing.Dev. Psychobiol. 18: 115–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenna, J. J. (1978). Biosocial functions of grooming behavior among the common Indian langur monkey (Presbytis entellus).Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 48: 503–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehlman, P. T., and Chapais, B. (1988). Differential effects of kinship, dominance, and the mating season on female allogrooming in a captive group ofMacaca fuscata.Primates 29: 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael, R. P., and Herbert, J. (1963). Menstrual cycle influences grooming behavior and sexual activity in the rhesus monkey.Science 140: 500–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poirier, F. E. (1970). The Nilgiri langur (Presbytis johnii), of south India. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.)Primate Behavior, Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 254–383.Google Scholar
  32. Sade, D. S. (1965). Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 23: 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sambraus, H. H. (1978).Nutztierethologie, Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  34. Saunders, C. D., and Hausfater, G. (1988). The functional significance of baboon grooming behavior.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 525: 430–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schino, G., Aureli, F., and Troisi, A. (1988). Equivalence between measures of allogrooming: an empirical comparison in three species of macaques.Folia Primatol. 51: 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys.J. Theor. Biol. 65: 671–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smuts, B. B. (1985).Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Sommer, V. (1985).Weibliche und männliche Reproduktionsstrategien der Hamuman-Languren, (Presbytis entellus), von Jodhpur, Rajasthan/Indien, Dissertation, University of Göttingen, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  39. Sommer, V. (1987). Infanticide among free-ranging langurs, (Presbytis entellus), at Jodhpur (Rajasthan/India): Recent observations and a reconsideration of hypotheses.Primates 28: 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sparks, J. (1967). Allogrooming in primates: A review. In Morris, D. (ed.),Primate Ethology, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp. 148–175.Google Scholar
  41. Terry, R. L. (1970). Primate grooming as a tension reduction mechanism.J. Psychol. 76: 129–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Troisi, A., and Schino, G. (1987). Environmental and social influences on autogrooming behaviour in a captive group of Java monkeysBehaviour 100: 292–302.Google Scholar
  43. Turillazzi, P. G., Marchini, S., Alessandroni, P., Baldo, N., Campanella, C., and Trucch, D. (1982). Social grooming inMacaca fuscata.Ann. Inst. Sup. Sanita 18: 239–250.Google Scholar
  44. Vogel, C. (1988). Sociobiology of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus): Introduction into the Jodhpur field project.Hum. Evol. 3: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber, J. (1973). Tactile communication among free-ranging langurs.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 38: 481–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winkler, P. (1984). The adaptive capacities of the Hanuman langur and the categorizing of diet. In Chivers, D. J., Wood, B. A., and Bilsborough, A. (eds.),Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 161–166.Google Scholar
  47. Winkler, P. (1988a). Feeding behavior of a food enhanced troop of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) in Jodhpur, India. In Fa, J. E., and Southwick, C. H. (eds.),The Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  48. Winkler, P. (1988b). Troop history, female reproductive strategies and timing of male change in Hanuman langures,Presbytis entellus.Hum. Evol. 3: 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu, H. M. H., Holmes, W. G., Medina, S. R., and Sackett, G. P. (1980) Kin preferences in infantMacaca nemestrina.Nature 285: 225–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Young, G. H., Coelho, A. M., Jr., and Bramblett, C. A. (1982). The development of grooming, sociosexual behavior, play and aggression in captive baboons in their first two years.Primates 23: 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carola Borries
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für AnthropologieGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations