Enzymatic interesterification of tallow-sunflower oil mixtures

  • Thomas A. Foglia
  • Kimberly Petruso
  • Stephen H. Feairheller


In an effort to improve the physical and/or thermal characteristics of solid fats, the enzymatic interesterification of tallow and butterfat with high-oleic sunflower oil and soybean oil was investigated. The two simultaneously occurring reactions, interesterification and hydrolysis, were followed by high-performance liquid chromatography of altered glycerides and by gas-liquid chromatography of liberated free fatty acids. The enzymes used in these studies were immobilized lipases that included either a 1,3-acyl-selective lipase or acis-9-C18-selective lipase. The degree of hydrolysis of the fat/oil mixtures was dependent upon the initial water content of the reaction medium. The extent of the interesterification reaction was dependent on the amount of enzyme employed but not on the reaction temperature over the range of 50–70°C. Changes in melting characteristics of the interesterified glyceride mixtures were followed by differential scanning calorimetry of the residual mixed glycerides after removal of free fatty acids. Interesterification of the glyceride mixes with the two types of enzymes allowed for either a decrease or increase in the solid fat content of the initial glyceride mix.

Key words

Butter DSC HPLC hydrolysis interesterification lipases melting points soy oil sunflower oil tallow 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mukherjee, K.D.,Fette Wissenschaft Technol. 94:542 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalo, P., H. Huotari and M. Antila,Fat Sci. Technol. 91:276 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lazar, Von G.,Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 87:394 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elliott, J.M., and K.L. Parkin,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:171 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen, T.T., and P. Eigtved, inProceedings of World Conference on Emerging Technologies in the Fats and Oils Industry, edited by A. R. Baldwin, American Oil Chemists’ Society, 1986, p. 365.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eigtved, P., Eur. Patent EP 140542 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, M.F., G. Abraham and V.T. John,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67:831 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloomer, S., P. Adlercreutz and B. Mattiasson, Ibid.:519 (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ergan, F., M. Trani and G. Andre, Ibid.:412 (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forssell, P., R. Kervinen, M. Lappi, P. Linko, T. Suortti and K. Poutanen, Ibid.:126 (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marks, T.A., J.G. Quinn, J. Sampugna and R.G. Jensen,Lipids 3:143 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jensen, R.G., D. Rubano Galluzzo and V.J. Bush,Biocatalysis 3:307 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sonnet, P.E., and J.A. Gazzillo,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:11 (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marmer, W.N., and R.J. Maxwell,Lipids 16:365 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 3rd edn., edited by R.O. Walker, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Oil Chemists’ Society 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Foglia
    • 1
  • Kimberly Petruso
    • 1
  • Stephen H. Feairheller
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of AgricultureEastern Regional Research Center, Agriculture Research ServicePhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations