Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 229–232 | Cite as

Avocado oil production and chemical characteristics

  • M. J. Werman
  • I. Neeman
Technical

Abstract

Centrifugal force separation is a relatively new industrial process for extracting avocado oil. This study examined the influences of temperature, pH and NaCl concentration on oil extraction efficiency by centrifugal processing. Optimal separation conditions occurred at 75 C, with a pH of 5.5 and NaCl concentration of 5%.

Differences in chemical characteristics exist between avocado oils produced by industrial processes and those oils that were produced in the laboratory by organic solvent extraction. The highest amount of chlorophyll, 192.9 ppm, was obtained by ethanolic extraction in the laboratory. Unsaponifiables content reached 1.95% in industrial oil produced by organic solvent extraction. The highest acid value, 8.35, was obtained from industrial oil produced by centrifugal separation. Hydroxyl values in our oils were found to be 2–3 times higher than those reported in the literature.

Keywords

Petroleum Ether Centrifugal Separation Organic Solvent Extraction Unsaponifiable Fraction Avocado Fruit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Winton, A.L., and K.B. Winton, inThe Structure and Composition of Foods, Vol. II, John Wiley & Sons Inc. N.Y., 1949, p. 534.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tingwa, P.O., and R.E. Young,J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 100:447 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biale, J.B.,Plant Phys. 1:183 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petroccini, C., E. Bazan, N. Panno and V. Averna,La Rivista Italiana Sostanze Grasse LV:260 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazliak, P.,Fruits 26:615 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tango, J.S., S.I. Costa, A.J. Antuner and I.B. Figueredo, Ibid. 27:143 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biale, J.B., and R.E. Young, inThe Biochemistry of Fruits and their Products, Vol. 2, edited by A.C. Hulmer, Academic Press, London, 1971, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazliak, P.,Fruits 20:49 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutfinger, T., and A. Letan,Lipids 9:658 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 3rd. edn., AOCS, Champaign, IL, 1974, Method Ca 6b-53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid., Method Cc 13d-55.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., Method Cd 4-40.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibid., Method Cd 3a-63.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 11th edn., AOAC, Washington, D.C., 1970, Methods 2.051 and 7.053.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehlenbacher, V.C., inThe Analysis of Fats and Oils, The Garrard Press, Champaign, IL, 1960, pp. 571.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreev, L., M.I. Afanasev, O.G. Chabrore and M.S. Vigergaus,Russian Chem Review 34.5 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson, L.A., and E.W. Lusas,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60:229 (1983).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thiers, H.,Fruits 26:133 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamilton, R.J., inRancidity in Foods, edited by J.C. Allen and R.J. Hamilton,App. Science Publ., London and N.Y., 1983, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joseph, D., and I. Neeman,La Rivista Italiana Delle Sostanze Grasse LIX:279 (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Werman
    • 1
  • I. Neeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering and BiotechnologyTechnion, Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations