European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 155, Issue 12, pp 1005–1008

Modern electronic and chemical thermometers used in the axilla are inaccurate

  • S. T. Zengeya
  • I. Blumenthal
General Pediatrics

Abstract

Abstract

Rectal and axillary temperatures were measured simultaneously in 83 children using three different thermometer devices providing 166 pairs of results. In the first series consisting of 22 febrile children (44 measurements) and 20 afebrile children (40 measurements), the rectal mercury measurement was compared to an axillary mercury and axillary Tempa-DOT thermometer. The axillary mercury had sensitivity of 14/22 (64%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%) while the Tempa-DOT had sensitivity of 15/22 (68%) and specificity of 19/20 (95%). In the second series comprising 21 febrile children (42 measurements) and 20 afebrile children (40 measurements) the axillary mercury had sensitivity of 11/21 (52%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%) while the electronic thermometer had sensitivity of 10/21 (48%) and specificity of 20/20 (100%). Regardless of the thermometer used, the axilla is a poor alternative to rectal measurements in the diagnosis of fever.

Conclusion

Mercury-free thermometers, when used in the axilla are as poor alternatives to reetal measurements as mercury-in-glass thermometers.

Key words

Mercury-in-glass thermometer Tempa-DOT thermometer Electronic thermometer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkins E (1984) Fever: The old and the new. J Infect Dis 149:339–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blainey CG (1974) Site selection in taking body temperature. Am J Nurs 74:1859–1861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blumethal I (1992) Should we ban the mercury thermometer? Discussion paper. J Royal Soc Med 85:553–555Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blumenthal I (1991) Which thermometer? The Lancet 337:1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chellapah G (1980) Aspects of thermoregulation in term and preterm newborn babies. University of Nottingham, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frank J D, Brown S (1978) Thermometers and rectal perforations in the neonate. Arch Dis Child 53:824–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karlberg P (1949) The significance of depth of insertion of the thermometer for recording the rectal temperature. Acta Paediatr Scand 38:359–366Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kresh MJ (1984) Axillary temperature as a screening test for fever in children. J. Pediatr 4:596–599Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morley CJ, Hewson PH, Thornton AJ, Cole TJ (1992) Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants. Arch Dis Child 67:122–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nichols G (1966) Oral, axillary and rectal temperature determinations and relationships. Narse Res 31:274–277Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogren JM (1990) The inaccuracy of axillary temperatures measured with an electronic thermometer. Am J Dis Child 144:109–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Payne D, Johnson A, McKenzie S, Rogers M (1994) Chemical and glass thermometers for axillary temperatures: how do they compare? Arch Dis Child 71:259–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith L, Prince HN, Johnson E (1981) Bacteriologic studies on electronic hospital thermometers. Infect Contol 4:315–316Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. T. Zengeya
    • 1
  • I. Blumenthal
    • 1
  1. 1.Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations