Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 200, Issue 1, pp 399–407 | Cite as

Can macrophytes be useful in biomanipulation of lakes? The Lake Zwemlust example

  • Teresa Ozimek
  • Ramesh D. Gulati
  • Ellen van Donk
Part Five: Macrophytes

Abstract

Lake Zwemlust (area 1.5 ha, Zm 1.5 m) has been the object of an extensive limnological study since its biomanipulation involving removal of planktivorous fish (bream) in March 1987 and emptying of the lake. In the subsequent summer period of 1987 the Secchi depth increased to the lake bottom (2.5 m), compared withca 30 cm in the earlier summers. The reaction of submerged macrophytes to improving under-water light climate was rapid. In summer 1987, besides the introducedChara globularis, 5 species of submerged macrophytes occurred and colonized 10% of the lake area. In 1988 and 1989 only quantitative changes were observed; new species did not appear, but the area colonized by macrophytes increased by 7 and 10 times, respectively.Elodea nuttallii was dominant among the macrophytes andMougeotia sp. among the filamentous green algae. Their abundance, contributed to transient N-limination of phytoplankton causing a persistent clear water phase in 1988 and 1989, unlike in 1987 when zooplankton grazing contributed chiefly to the water clarity. Laboratory bioassays on macrophytes confirmed nitrogen limitation.

Key words

lake biomanipulation submerged macrophytes filamentous green algae phosphorus and nitrogen cycling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barko, J. W. & G. J. Filbin, 1983. Influences of light and temperature on chlorophyll composition in submersed freshwater macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 15: 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barko, J. W. & R. M. Smart, 1981. Comparative influences of light and temperature on the growht and metabolism of selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, C. E., 1971. The limnological role of aquatic macrophytes and their relationship to reservoir management. Res. Fish Limnol. 8: 153–166.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, S. R. & D. M. Lodge, 1986. Effects of submerged macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot. 26: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, J. C., 1975. Minimal dissolved oxygen requirements of aquatic life with emphasis on Canadian species: a review. J. Fish Res. Bd Can. 32: 2295–2332.Google Scholar
  6. Engel, S., 1988. the role and interactions of submerged macrophytes in a shallow Wisconsin Lake. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 4: 229–341.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, G. P., 1969. Some factors in the competition or antagonism among bacteria, algae, and aquatic weeds. J. Phycol. 5: 351–359.Google Scholar
  8. Golterman, H. L., 1969. Methods for chemical analysis of freshwaters. IBP Handbook 8, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Goulder, R., 1969. Interactions between the rates of productions of a freshwater macrophyte and phytoplankton in a pond. Oikos 20: 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimm, M. P., 1989. Northern pike (Esox lucius L.) and aquatic vegetation, tools in the management of fisheries and water quality in shallow waters. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulati, R. D., 1989. Structure and feeding activities of zooplankton community in Lake Zwemlust, in the two years after biomanipulation. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard-Williams, C., 1981. Studies on the ability of aPotamogeton pectinatus community to remove dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus compounds from water. J. appl. Ecol. 18: 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuni, H., 1982. The critical water temperature for the active growth ofElodea nuttalli (Planch.) St. John. Jap. J. Ecol. 32: 111–112.Google Scholar
  14. Lachavanne, J. B., 1985. The influence of accelerated eutrophication on the macrophytes of Swiss lakes: abundance and distribution. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 2950–2955.Google Scholar
  15. Landers, D. H., 1982. Effects of naturally senescing aquatic macrophytes on nutrient chemistry and chlorophylla of surrounding waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 428–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampert, W., 1988. The relation between zooplankton biomass and grazing. A review. Limnologica 19: 11–20.Google Scholar
  17. Meijer, M. L., A. J. P. Raat & E. W. Doef, 1989. Restoration by biomanipulation of Lake Bleiswijkse Zoom (The Netherlands): first results. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mickle, A. M. & R. G. Wetzel, 1978. Effectiveness of submersed angiosperm-epiphyte complexes on exchange of nutrients and organic carbon in littoral systems. Aquat. Bot. 4: 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moss, B., (1990). Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 367–377.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, J. & J. P. Riley, 1962. A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analyt. chim. Acta 26: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozimek, T., 1978. Effects of municipal sewage on the submerged macrophytes of lake littoral. Ekol. pol. 26: 1–39.Google Scholar
  22. Ozimek, T. & A. Kowalczewski, 1984. Long-term changes of the submerged macrophytes in eutrophic Lake Mikolajskie (North Poland). Aquat. Bot. 19: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Phillips, G. L., D. Eminson & B. Moss, 1978. A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated freshwaters. Aquat. Bot. 4: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pieczynska, E. & T. Ozimek, 1976. Ecological significance of lake macrophytes. Int. J. Ecol. Envir. Sci. 2: 115–128.Google Scholar
  25. Pokorny & Ondok, 1982. Photosynthesis and primary production in submerged macrophyte stands. In: B. Gopal, R. E. Turner, R. G. Wetzel & D. E. Whigham (eds). Wetlands: Ecology and management, Internat. Sci. Publ. Jaipur, India: 206–214.Google Scholar
  26. Prejs, A., 1984. Herbivory by temperature freshwater fishes and its consequences. Envir. Biol. Fishes 10: 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prenki, R. T., T. D. Gustafson & M. S. Adams, 1978. Nutrient movements in lakeshore marshes. In: R. E. Good, D. F. Zhigham & R. L. Simpson (eds). Freshwater Wetlands. Academic Press, New York, London: 169–194.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, J. & D. I. Wright, 1984. Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round lake Minnesota, the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simpson, P. S. & J. W. Eaton, 1986. Comparative studies of photosynthesis of the submerged macrophyteElodea canadensis and filamentous algaeCladophora glomerata andSpirogyra sp. Aquat. Bot. 14: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spence, D. H. N., 1972. Light on freshwater macrophytes. Botanical Society of Edinburgh Transactions, 41: 491–505.Google Scholar
  31. Stainton, M. P., M. J. Capel & P. J. Armstrong, 1974. The chemical analysis of freshwater. Miscellaneous special publications no. 25. Research and Development Directorate Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
  32. Van Donk, E., in press. Changes in community structure and growth limitation of phytoplankton due to top-down food-web manipulation. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24.Google Scholar
  33. Van Donk, E., R. D. Gulati & M. P. Grimm, 1989. Food-web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: positive and negative effects during the first two years. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati & J. P. G. Klein-Breteler (1990). Whole-lake food-web manipulation as a means to study community interactions in a small ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 275–289.Google Scholar
  35. Verdouw, H., C. J. A. Echteld & E. M. J. Dekkers, 1977. Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Wat. Res. 12: 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wium-Andersen, S. U., U. Anthoni, C. Cristophersen & G. Houen, 1982. Allepathic effects on phytoplankton by substances isolated from aquatic macrophytes (Charales). Oikos 39: 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Ozimek
    • 1
  • Ramesh D. Gulati
    • 1
  • Ellen van Donk
    • 2
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hydrobiology, Institute of ZoologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Provincial Waterboard of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations