The journal of mental health administration

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 348–355 | Cite as

Residential alternatives to hospitalization for patients with severe and persistent mental illness: Should patients with comorbid substance abuse be excluded?

  • James M. Herrell
  • Wayne Fenton
  • Loren R. Mosher
  • Sarah Hedlund
  • Beth Lee


Residential alternatives to hospitalization for adults with severe mental illness in crisis were not designed for, and often exclude, persons with coexisting substance abuse disorders. Given high comorbidity rates, however, it is important to know whether residential alternatives can be effective for patients with dual diagnoses. To explore the impact of comorbidity on treatment outcomes, structured interviews were conducted at admission and discharge with 92 consecutive admissions to a residential alternative. Using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, two groups were identified: 24 patients with and 68 patients without comorbid substance abuse disorders. At admission, the two groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics. The treatment was effective independent of comorbidity; at discharge, treatment success, symptom improvement, and patient satisfaction were similar for both groups. Persons with coexisting substance abuse disorders remained in residence a week longer, but the difference was not statistically significant. Residential alternatives appear suitable for patients with dual diagnoses.


Schizophrenia Dual Diagnosis Substance Abuse Disorder Persistent Mental Illness Montgomery County 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Keisler C: Mental hospitals and alternative care: Noninstitutionalization as potential public policy for mental patients.American Psychologist 1982; 37:349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mosher LR: Soteria: A therapeutic community for psychotic persons.International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 1991; 12:53–67.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mosher LR: The Soteria project: The first generation American residential alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization. In: Warner R (Ed.).Alternatives to Hospitalization for Acute Psychiatric Care. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, in press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosher LR, Burti L:Community Mental Health: A Practical Guide. New York: Norton, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stroul BA:Crisis Residential Services in a Community Support System. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ridgely MS, Goldman HH, Willenbring M: Barriers to the care of persons with dual diagnoses: Organizational and financing issues.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1990; 16:123–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Douglas MZ, Edonis MD, Fisher W: Assessment and treatment of comorbid substance abuse in individuals with schizophrenia.Psychiatric Annals 1994; 24:477–483.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowers MB, Mazure CM, Jatlow PI: Psychotogenic drug use and neuroleptic response.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1990; 16:81–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drake RE, Noordsy MD: Case management for people with coexisting severe mental disorder and substance abuse disorder.Psychiatric Annals 1994; 24:427–431.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galanter M, Castaneda R, Ferman J: Substance abuse among general psychiatric patients: Place of presentation, diagnosis and treatment.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1988; 14:211–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kresky-Wolff M, Matthews S, Kalibat F, et al.: Crossing place: A residential model for crisis intervention.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1984; 35:72–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moos RH:Evaluating Treatment Environments: A Social Ecological Approach. New York: John Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third ed., rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1987; 13:261–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibben M, First MB:Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R—Patient Edition (SCID-P, Version 1.0). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drake RE, Osher FC, Noordsy DL, et al.: Diagnosis of alcohol use disorders in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1990; 16:57–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartels SJ, Teague GB, Drake RE, et al.: Substance abuse in schizophrenia: Service utilization and costs.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1993; 181:227–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonne SC, Brady KT, Morton WA: Substance abuse and bipolar affective disorder.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1994; 182:349–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drake RE, Bebout RR, Quimby E, et al.: Process evaluation in the Washington, D.C., Dual Diagnosis Project.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 1993; 10:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGlynn EA, Boynton J, Morton SC, et al.: Treatment for the dually diagnosed homeless: Program models and implementation experience: Los Angeles.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 1993; 10:171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Mental Health Administrators 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Herrell
    • 1
  • Wayne Fenton
    • 2
  • Loren R. Mosher
    • 3
  • Sarah Hedlund
    • 4
  • Beth Lee
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Substance Abuse TreatmentRockville
  2. 2.Department of Health ServicesSan Diego
  3. 3.Victim, and Mental Health ServicesMontgomery County Department of AddictionRockville
  4. 4.Chestnut Lodge Research InstituteRockville

Personalised recommendations