Comparison of the potential coefficient models of the Standard Earth (II and III) and the GEM 5 and GEM 6

E.M. GAPOSCHKIN (ed.): 1973 Smithsonian Standard Earth (III). Spec. Rep. 353, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar

E.M. GAPOSCHKIN and K. LAMBECK: 1969 Smithsonian Standard Earth (II), Spec. Rep. 315, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Mass., 1970.Google Scholar

D.P. HAJELA: The Computation of 15° and 10° Equal Area Block Terrestrial Free Air Gravity Anomalies, Report No. 194, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1972.Google Scholar

W.M. KAULA: Tests and Combination of Satellite Determinations of the Gravity Field with Gravimetry, J. Geophysical Research, 71, 5303–5314, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R.H. RAPP: The Formation and Analysis of a 5° Equal Area Block Terrestrial Gravity Field, Report No. 178, Dept. of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1972.Google Scholar

R.H. RAPP: The Earth's Gravitational Field from the Combination of Satellite and Terrestrial Data, in Proceedings: Symposium on Earth's Gravitational Field and Secular Variations in Position, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1974.Google Scholar

J.A. RICHARDSON and F.J. LERCH: Gravitational Field Models, GEM 5 and GEM 6, Eos Trans. AGU 55, 218, 1974.Google Scholar

C.C. TSCHERNING and R.H. RAPP: Closed Covariance Expressions for Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the Vertical Implied by Anomaly Degree Variance Models, Report No. 208, Dept. of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1974.Google Scholar