Advertisement

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 359–361 | Cite as

Influence of changing peripheral geometry on electrical impedance tomography measurements

  • E. Gersing
  • B. Hofmann
  • M. Osypka
CAIT Communication

Keywords

Deformation Impedance Impedance tomography Peripheral geometry Source of error 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, A., Guardo, R., andBerthiaume, Y. (1994): ‘Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion?’. Proc. 16th Ann. In. Conf. of IEEE-EMBS, Baltimore, Maryland 3–6 November 1994, pp. 534–535Google Scholar
  2. Gersing, E., andOsypka, M. (1994): ‘EIT using magnitude and phase in an extended frequency range’,Physiol. Meas.,15, pp. A21-A28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heimbach, M. (1990): ‘Data collection errors’,in Webster J. G. (Ed). ‘Electrical impedance tomography’ (Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK) pp. 87–96Google Scholar
  4. Webster J. G. (1990a): ‘Electrical impedance imaging’,in Webster, J. G. (Ed): ‘Electrical impedance tomography’, (Adam Hilger; Bristol, UK) pp. 1–7Google Scholar
  5. Webster, J. G. (1990b): ‘Electrodes’in Webster J. G. (Ed): ‘Electrical impedance tomography’ (Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK) pp. 21–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Gersing
    • 1
  • B. Hofmann
    • 1
  • M. Osypka
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physiology and PathophysiologyUniversity of GoettingenGoettingenGermany

Personalised recommendations