Parental care and EGG size in salamanders: An examination of the safe harbor hypothesis

  • Ronald A. Nussbaum
Article

Summary

The safe harbor hypothesis includes the suggestion that parental care causes the embryonic stage to be the safest harbor, and, therefore, egg size will increase in populations with parental care to decrease the duration of subsequent, higher risk stages. Neither the safe habor hypothesis nor r and K theory seem adequate to explain the correlation between egg size and the presence/absence of parental care among salamanders, a group in which there is a further correlation between the larval (hatchling) habitat and egg size/parental care. Pond-breeding salamanders generally have small eggs and lack parental care, and stream-breeding salamanders generally have large eggs and parental care. I argue that the fundamental difference in the food available to hatchling salamanders between lentic (plankton-rich) and lotic (plankton-poor) environments selects for relatively lower parental investment in the lentic environment. From the standpoint of parental fitness, small (more numerous) hatchlings have a greater payoff where the available food is mall and dense (zooplankton in lentic environments), and large hatchlings are selectively advantageous where the food is of large size and less dense (benthic invertebrates in lotic environments). Selection for larger hatchlings in lotic environments results in longer embryonic periods and,ceteris paribus, greater total embryonic mortality. Embryo hiding and guarding have evolved among lotic-breeding salamanders as compensatory mechanisms to reduce the rate of embryonic mortality. In this view, parental care is a consequence of selection for larger egg size and not an umbrella that allows egg size to increase, contrary to the safe harbor hypothesis.

The relationship between variance in parental investment and food available to offspring, developed here for salamanders, may be of general significance. YosiakiItô, a critic of r and K theory, independently arrived at a similar conclusion from a broader data base.

Keywords

Parental Care Parental Investment Embryonic Period Safe Harbor Embryonic Mortality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alcher, M. (1981a) Reproduction en elevage deEuproctus platycephalus (Urodela, Salamandridae).Amphibia-Reptilia 2: 97–105.Google Scholar
  2. Alcher, M. (1981b) Sur l'existence de soins parentaux chezEuproctus montanus (Urodela, Salamandridae).Amphibia-Reptilia 2: 189–194.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, W. E. (1920) A quantitative and statistical study of the plankton of the San Joaquin River and its tributaries in and near Stockton, California, in 1913.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 22: 1–292.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. D. (1967) A comparison of the life histories of coastal and montane populations ofAmbystoma macrodactylum in California.Amer. Midl. Nat. 77: 323–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. D. (1968) A comparison of the food habits ofAmbystoma macrodactylum sigillatum, Ambystoma macrodactylum croceum, andAmbystoma tigrinum califoriense.Herpetologica 24: 273–284.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. D. andG. K. Williamson (1976) Terrestrial mode of reproduction inAmbystoma cingulatum.Herpetologica 32: 214–221.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, P. L. (1943) The normal development ofTriturus pyrrhogaster.Anat. Rec. 86: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antonelli, A. L., R. A. Nussbaum andS. D. Smith (1972) Comparative food habits of four species of stream-dwelling vertebrates (Dicamptodon ensatus, D. copei, Cottus tenuis, Salmo gairdneri).Northwest Sci. 46: 277–289.Google Scholar
  9. Avery, R. A. (1968) Food and feeding relations of three species ofTriturus (Amphibia Urodela) during the aquatic phases.Oikos 19: 408–412.Google Scholar
  10. Bell, G. (1974) The reduction of morphological variation in natural populations of smooth newt larvae.J. Anim. Ecol. 43: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, G. (1975) The diet and dentition of smooth newt larvae (Triturus vulgaris).J. Zool. (London)176: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, G. andJ. H. Lawton (1975) The ecology of the eggs and larvae of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris (Linn.)).J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birge, E. A. andC. Juday. (1922) The inland lakes of Wisconsin. The plankton. I. Its quantity and chemical composition.Wis. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey, Bull. Sci. ser 64 1–222.Google Scholar
  14. Bishop, S. C. (1920) Notes on the habits and development of the four-toed salamander,Hemidactylium scutatum (Schlegel).New York State Mus. Bull. 219: 251–282.Google Scholar
  15. Bishop, S. C. (1936) Notes on the habits and development of the mudpuppyNecturus maculosus (Rafinesque).New York State Mus. Bull. 268: 5–61.Google Scholar
  16. Bishop, S. C. (1941) The salamanders of New York.New York State Mus. Bull. 324: 1–365.Google Scholar
  17. Bishop, S. C. (1943)Handbook of salamanders. Comstock, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  18. Branch, L. C. andR. Altig (1981) Nocturnal stratification of three species ofAmbystoma larvae.Copeia 1981: 870–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brandon, R. A. andR. G. Altig (1973) Eggs and small larvae of two species ofRhyacosiredon.Herpetologica 29: 349–351.Google Scholar
  20. Breder, C. M. (1935) The reproductive habits of the common catfish,Ameiurus nebulosus (LeSueur), with a discussion of their significance in ontogeny and phylogeny.Zoologica 19: 143–179.Google Scholar
  21. Briegleb, W. andJ. Schwartzkopff. (1961) Verhaltensweisen des Grottenolms (Proteus anguinus Laur.) und das Problem des Fortplanzungsraumes.Naturwissenschaften 22: 1–3.Google Scholar
  22. Brockelman, W. Y. (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size.Amer. Natur. 109: 677–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brodie, E. D., Jr., J. L. Hensel, Jr. andJ. A. Johnson (1974) Toxicity of the urodele amphibiansTaricha, Notophthalmus, Cynops, andParamesotriton (Salamandridae).Copeia 1974: 506–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown, H. A. (1976) The time-temperature relation of embryonic development in the northwestern salamander,Ambystoma gracile.Can. J. Zool. 54: 552–558.Google Scholar
  25. Bruce, R. C. (1968) Life history studies of the salamanders of the genusPseudotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
  26. Cadwallader, P. L. (1976) Breeding biology of a non-diadromous galaxiid,Galaxias vulgaris Stokell, in a New Zealand river.J. Fish. Biol. 8: 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Connon, F. E. (1947) A comparative study of the respiration of normal and hybridTriturus embryos and larvae.J. Exp. Zool. 105: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Curtis, B. (1938)The life story of the fish. D. Appleton-Century Co., New York.Google Scholar
  29. Despax, R. (1923) Contribution a l'etude anatomique et biologique des batraciens urodeles, du groupe des euproctes et specialement de l'euprocte des PyreneesTriton (Euproctus) asper Duges Theses pour Docteur Sci. Nat. Toulouse, Ser. A, No.929.Google Scholar
  30. Dodson, S. I. (1970) Complementary feeding niches sustained by size-selective predation.Limnol. and Oceanog. 15: 131–137.Google Scholar
  31. Duellman, W. E. andJ. T. Wood (1954) Size and growth of the two-lines salamander,Eurycea bislineata rivicola.Copeia 1954: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dunn, E. R. (1923) The breeding habits of salamanders and their bearing on phylogeny.Copeia 115: 25–28.Google Scholar
  33. Dunn, E. R. (1926)Salamanders of the family Plethodontidae. Smith College, Fiftieth Anniversary Publ. ser. Vol.7.Google Scholar
  34. Ferrier, V. (1974) Chronologie du developpement de l'amphibien urodeleTylotriton verrucosus Anderson (Salamandridae).Ann. d'Embryol. et de Morphogenese 7: 407–416.Google Scholar
  35. Gallien, L. andO. Bidaud (1959) Table chronologique de developpement chezTriturus helveticus Raz.Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 84: 22–32.Google Scholar
  36. Gallien, L. andM. Durocher (1957) Table chronologique de developpement chezPleurodeles waltlii Michah.Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 91: 97–114.Google Scholar
  37. Gasser, F. (1964) Observations sur les stades initiaux du developpment de l'urodele PyreneenEuproctus asper.Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 89: 423–428.Google Scholar
  38. Gould, S. J. (1977)Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press, Harvard UniversityCambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Green, N. B., P. Brant, Jr., andB. Dowler (1967)Eurycea lucifuga in West Virginia: its distribution, ecology, and life history.Proc. W. Virginia Acad. Sci. 39: 297–304.Google Scholar
  40. Hamilton, W. J., Jr. (1940) The feeding habits of larval newts with reference to availability and selection of food items.Ecology 21: 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardin, G. (1956) Meaninglessness of the word protoplasm.Sci. Monthly 82: 112–120.Google Scholar
  42. Hardy, J. D., Jr. (1969) A summary of recent studies on the salamander,Ambystoma mabeei.Chesapeake Biol. Lab. Ref. No.69-20: 1–3.Google Scholar
  43. Hirschfield, M. F. andD. W. Tinkle (1975) Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 72: 2227–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hutchinson, V. H. (1956) Notes on the plethodontid salamanders,Eurycea lucifuga (Rafinesque), andEurycea longicauda longicauda (Green).Occas. Paps. Natl. Speleol. Soc. 3: 1–24.Google Scholar
  45. Itô, Y. (1959)Comparative ecology. Iwanami, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  46. Itô, Y. (1970) Groups and family bonds in animals in relation to their habitat. 389–415. InL. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman andJ. S. Rosenblatt (eds)Development and evolution of behavior. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  47. Itô, Y. (1980)Comparative ecology. Second ed., trans. byJ. Kikkawa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Itô, Y. andY. Iwasa (1981) Evolution of litter size I. Conceptual reexamination.Res. Popul. Ecol. 23: 344–359.Google Scholar
  49. Iwasawa, H. andY. Kera (1980) Normal stages of development of the Japanese lungless salamander,Onychodactylus japonicus (Houttuyn).Jap. J. Herpetol. 8: 73–89 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  50. Kaplan, R. H. (1980) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders (Ambystoma).Evolution 34: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kerbert, C. (1904) Zur Fortpflanzung vonMegalobatrachus maximus Schlegel (Cryptobranchus japonicus v.d. Hoeven).Zool. Anz. 27: 305–320.Google Scholar
  52. Knight, F. C. E. (1938) Die Entwicklung vonTriton alpestris bei verschiedenen Temperaturen mit Normentafel.Wilhelm Roux's Archives 137: 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuramoto, M. (1978) Correlations of quantitative parameters of fecundity in amphibians.Evolution 32: 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lack, D. (1954) The evolution of reproductive rates. 143–156. InJ. Huxley, A. C. Hardy andE. B. Ford (eds)Evolution, as a process. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  55. Licht, L. E. (1975a) Comparative life history features of the western spotted frog,Rana pretiosa, from low-and high-elevation populations.Can. J. Zool. 53: 1254–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Licht, L. E. (1975b) Growth and food of larvalAmbystoma gracile from a lowland population in southwestern British Columbia.Can. J. Zool. 53: 1716–1722.Google Scholar
  57. MacArthur, R. H. (1962) Some generalized theorems of natural, selection.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 48: 1893–1897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MacArthur, R. H. andE. O. Wilson (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Monographs in Pop. Biol.1.Google Scholar
  59. Martof, B. S. (1962) Some aspects of the life history and ecology of the salamanderLeurognathus.Amer. Midl. Natur.,67: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Noble, G. K. (1927) The value of life history data in the study of the evolution, of the Amphibia.Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 30: 31–128.Google Scholar
  61. Noble, G. K. andM. K. Brady (1933) Observations of the life history of the marbled salamander,Ambystoma opacum Gravenhorst.Zoologica 11: 89–132.Google Scholar
  62. Nussbaum, R. A. (1969a) Nests and eggs, of the Pacific giant salamander,Dicamptodon ensatus (Eschscholtz).Herpetologica 25: 257–262.Google Scholar
  63. Nussbaum, R. A. (1969b) A nest site of the Olympic salamander,Rhyacotriton olympicus (Gaige).Herpetologica 25: 277–278.Google Scholar
  64. Nussbaum, R. A. (1985) The evolution of parental care in salamanders.Misc. Publ. Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 169: 1–50.Google Scholar
  65. Nussbaum, R. A. andC. K. Tait (1977) Aspects of the life history and ecology of the Olympic salamander,Rhyacotriton olympicus (Gaige).Amer. Midl. Natur. 98: 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nussbaum, R. A., E. D. Brodie, Jr. andR. M. Storm (1983) Amphibians and reptiles of the Pacific Northwest. University of Idaho Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
  67. Orr, L. P. andW. T. Maple (1978) Competition avoidance mechanisms in salamander larvae of the genusDesmognathus.Copeia 1978: 679–7685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parry, G. D. (1981) The meanings of r-and K-selection.Oecologia 48: 260–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pearre, J. Jr. (1980) Feeding by Chaetognatha: the relation of prey size to predator size in several species.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 3: 125–134.Google Scholar
  70. Pennak, R. W. (1943) Limnological variables in a Colorado mountain stream.Amer. Midl. Natur. 29: 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Petranka, J. W. andJ. G. Petranka (1980) Selected aspects of the larval ecology of the marbled salamanderAmbystoma opacum in the southern portion of its range.Amer. Midl. Natur. 104: 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Petranka, J. W., J. J. Just andE. C. Crawford (1982) Hatching of amphibian embryos: the physiological trigger.Science 217: 257–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pianka, E. R. (1970) On r-and K-selection.Amer. Natur. 104: 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pianka, E. R. (1978)Evolutionary ecology. Harper New York.Google Scholar
  75. Pope, C. H. (1924) Notes on North Carolina salamanders with especial reference to the egg-laying habits ofLeurognathus andDesmognathus.Amer. Mus. Novit. 153: 1–15.Google Scholar
  76. Regal, P. J. (1966) Feeding specializations and the classification of terrestrial salamanders.Evolution 20: 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Riemer, W. J. (1958) Variation and systematic relationships within the salamander genusTaricha..Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 56: 301–390.Google Scholar
  78. Salthe, S. N. (1969) Reproductive modes and the number and sizes of ova in the urodeles.Amer. Midl. Nat. 81: 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salthe, S. N. andW. E. Duellman (1973) Quantitative constraints associated with reproductive mode in anurans. 229–249. InJ. L. Vial, (ed)Evolutionary biology of the anurans. Univ. Missouri Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  80. Shine, R. (1978) Propagule size and parental care: the “safe harbor” hypothesis.J. Theor. Biol. 75: 417–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, B. G. (1907) The life history and habits ofCryptobranchus allegheniensis.Biol. Bull. 13: 5–39Google Scholar
  82. Smith, B. G. (1912) The embryology ofCryptobranchus allegheniensis, including comparisons with some other vertebrates.J. Morphol. 23: 61–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, C. S. andS. D. Fretwell (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring.Amer. Natur. 108: 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stearns, S. C. (1977) The evolution of life history traits: a critique of the theory and a review of the data.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8: 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Strathmann, R. R. (1977) Egg size, larval development, and juvenile size in benthic marine invertebrates.Amer. Natur. 111: 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Svärdson, G. (1949) Natural selection and egg number in fish.Institute of Freshwater Research, Fishery Board of Sweden. Rept. No.29: 115–122.Google Scholar
  87. Tago, K. (1929) Notes on the habits and life history ofMegalobatrachus japonicus.X e Congress Internatl. Zool. Budapest1: 828–838.Google Scholar
  88. Thorn, R. (1968) Les salamanders d'Europe, d'Asie, et d'Afrique du nord. Paul Lechevalier, Paris.Google Scholar
  89. Thorson, G. (1946) Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the sound (Oresund).Medd. Komm. Danm. Fisk.—og Havunders., Ser. Plankton 4: 1–523.Google Scholar
  90. Tilley, S. G. (1968) Size-fecudity relationships and their evolutionary implications in five desmognathine salamanders.Evolution 22: 806–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tilley, S. G. (1970) Aspects of the reproductive ecology ofDesmognathus ochrophaeus in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Mich, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  92. Twitty, V. C. (1936) Correlated genetic and embryological experiments onTriturus. I and II.J. Exp. Zool. 74: 239–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Twitty V. C. (1966)Of scientists and salamanders. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  94. Utsunomiya, Y. andT. Utsunomiya (1977) On the development ofTylototriton andersoni.J. Fac. Fish. Anim. Husb., Hiroshima Univ. 16: 65–76 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  95. Vance, R. R. (1973a) On reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates.Amer. Natur. 107: 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vance R. R. (1973b) More on reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates.Amer. Natur. 107: 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vandel, A. andM. Bouillon (1959) La reproduction du Protee (Proteus anguinus Laurenti).C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 248: 1267–1272.Google Scholar
  98. Wake, D. B. (1966) Comparative osteology and evolution of the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae.Mem. So. Calif. Acad. Sci. 4: 1–111.Google Scholar
  99. Welch P. S. (1935)Limnology McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  100. Werner, E. A. (1974) The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications.J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31: 1531–1536.Google Scholar
  101. Wilbur, H. M., D. W. Tinkle andJ. P. Collins (1974) Environmental certainty, trophic level, and resource availability in life history evolution.Amer. Natur 108: 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Williams, G. C. (1966)Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Population Ecology 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald A. Nussbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Zoology and Department of BiologyThe University of MichiganAnn ArborU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations