Neurophysiology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 63–69 | Cite as

Properties of the apamin-sensitive component of Ca2+-dependent K+ current in smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli

  • A. V. Povstyan
  • A. V. Zima
  • M. I. Harhun
  • M. F. Shuba
Article

Abstract

With the help of a standard voltage-clamp technique, we investigated transmembrane ion currents in isolated smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli. In Ca2+-dependent K+ current, we identified and studied the properties of an apamin-sensitive voltage-independent component carried through the channels of low conductance (in many publications called small conductance,I SK(Ca)). This component did not show the temporal inactivation;I SK(Ca) was insensitive to the action of 4 mM tetraethylammonium, but was completely blocked by 500 nM of apamin. It was shown thatI SK(Ca) is very sensitive to changes in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+] i ): a decrease in [Ca2+] i up to 50 nM resulted in the almost complete blockade of the current. The entry of Ca ions into a cell from the external solution through the voltage-operated Ca2+ channels of L-type was not an obligatory condition for activation ofI SK(Ca). The current-voltage relationship forI SK(Ca) had a maximum within the voltage range of +20 to +50 mV.

Keywords

smooth muscle cells Ca2+-dependent K+ channels intracellular Ca2+ concentration apamin tetraethylammonium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. V. Zholos, V. A. Bouryi, and M. F. Shuba “Components of transmembrane ion current of the electroexcitable membrane of smooth muscle cells,”Biol. Membrany,3, No. 8, 804–815 (1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Yamamoto, S. L. Hu, and C. Y. Kao, “Outward current in single smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli,”Gen. J. Physiol.,93, No. 3, 551–564 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. L. Hu, Y. Yamamoto, and C. Y. Kao, “Permeation, selectivity, and blockade of the Ca2+-activated potassium channel of the guinea pigtaenia coli myocyte,”Gen. J. Physiol. 94, No. 5, 849–862 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. V. Povstyan, A. V. Zima, V. L. Reznikov, et al., “Components of depolarization-induced transmembrane ion current in isolated smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli,”Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology,29, Nos. 4/5, 340–350 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. V. Povstyan, A. V. Zima, M. I. Harhun, and M. F. Shuba, “Properties of a charibdotoxin-sensitive component of Ca2+-dependent K+ current in smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli,”Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology,32, No. 1, 3–10, (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Hugues, H. Schmid, G. Romey, et al., “The Ca2+-dependent slow K+ conductance in cultured rat muscle cells: characterization with apamin,”EMBO J.,1, 1039–1042 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. L. Blatz and K. L. Magleby, “Single apamin-blocked Ca-activated K+ channels of low conductance in cultured rat skeletal muscle,”Nature,323, 718–720 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Capiod and D. C. Ogden, “The properties of calcium-activated potassium ion channels in guinea-pig isolated hepatocytes,”J. Physiol.,409, 285–295 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. S. Gagov, D. B. Duridanova, and K. K. Boev, “Participation of calcium, released from the IP3-sensitive Ca-store, in activation of Ca-dependent potassium conductance of ileal smooth muscle cells,”Gen. Physiol. Biophys.,12, 199–211 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Vogalis and R. K. Goyal, “Activation of small conductance Ca2+-dependent K+ channels by purinergic agonists in smooth muscle cells of the mouse ileum,”J. Physiol.,502, No. 3, 497–508 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Vogalis, Y. Zhang, and R. K. Goyal, “An intermediate conductance K+ channel in the cell membrane of mouse intestinal smooth muscle,”Biochim. Biophys. Acta,1371, No. 2, 309–316 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. D. Koh, G. M. Dick, and K. M. Sanders, “Small-conductance Ca2+-dependent K+ channels activated by ATP in murine colonic smooth muscle,”Am. J. Physiol.,273, No. 6, C2010-C2021 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Zima, A. V. Povstyan, and M. F. Shuba, “Ca2+-dependent K+ channels of big conductance in the membrane of smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli,”Vestn. Kar’kov Univ., Ser. Biophys. Vestn., No. 466, Issue 5, 47–51 (1999).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. P. Hamill, A. Marty, E. Neher, et al., “Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cell-free membrane patches,”Pflügers Arch.,391, No. 1, 85–100 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Zima, A. É. Belevich, Ya. D. Tsytsyura, and M. F. Shuba, “Effect of nitric oxide on Ca2+ and Ca2+-activated K+ channels in smooth muscle cells of the guinea pigtaenia coli,”Fizika Zhivogo,4, No. 1, 67–72 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. H. P. Alexander and J. A. Peters,TiPS Receptor & Ion Channel Nomenclature Supplement (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. A. Bouryi, A. V. Gourkovskaya and M. F. Shuba, “Identification of transmembrane Ca2+ current of smooth muscle cells in K+-free medium,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,268, No. 2, 481–485 (1983).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. V. Rekalov, V. M. Taranenko, and M. F. Shuba, “Calcium current in single smooth muscle cells,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,276, No. 3, 750–752 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. Ya. Ganitkevich, S. V. Smimov, and M. F. Shuba, “Identification of Ca2+ current in isolated smooth muscle cells,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,282, No. 3, 717–720 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. V. Zholos, L. V. Baidan, and M. F. Shuba, “Some properties of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release mechanism in single visceral smooth muscle cell of the guinea-pig,”J. Physiol.,457, 1–25 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. L. Blatz and K. L. Magleby, “Ion conductance and selectivity of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle,”J. Gen. Physiol.,84, No. 1, 1–23 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Latorre and C. Miller, “Conduction and selectivity in potassium channels,”J. Membrane Biol.,71, Nos. 1/2, 11–30 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. D. Benham, T. B. Bolton, R. J. Lang, and T. Takewaki, “The mechanism of action of Ba2+ and TEA on single Ca2+-activated K+ channels in arterial and intestinal smooth muscle cell membranes,”Pflügers Arch.,403, No. 2, 120–127 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Marty, “Ca-dependent K channels with large unitary conductance in chromaffin cell membranes,”Nature,291, 497–500 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Kohler, B. Hirschberg, C. T. Bond, et al., “Small-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels from mammalian brain,”Science,273, 1709–1714 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. S. Atkinson, G. A. Robertson, and B. Ganetzky, “A component of calcium-activated potassium channels encoded by theDrosophila slo locus,”Science,253, 551–555 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Kolb, “Potassium channels in excitable and non-excitable cells,”Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.,115, 52–91 (1990).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. L. Becker, J. J. Singer, J. V. Walsh, and F. S. Fay, “Regulation of calcium concentration in voltage-clamped smooth muscle cells,”Science,244, 211–214 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. Ya. Ganitkevich and G. Isenberg, “Depolarization-mediated intracellular calcium transients in isolated smooth muscle cells of guinea-pig urinary bladder,”J. Physiol.,435, 187–205 (1991).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. N. Barrett, K. L. Magleby, and B. S. Pallotta, “Properties of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle,”J. Physiol.,331, 211–230 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. C. Cole and K. M. Sanders, “Characterization of macroscopic outward currents of canine colonic myocytes,”Am. J. Physiol.,26, No. 3, C461-C469 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Povstyan
    • 1
  • A. V. Zima
    • 1
  • M. I. Harhun
    • 1
  • M. F. Shuba
    • 1
  1. 1.Bogomolets Institute of PhysiologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations