, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 389–394 | Cite as

Dependence between the parameters of dynamic and stationary segments of the EMG activity in the elbow joint muscles and the joint angle during realization of targeted movements in cats

  • G. V. Dovgalets
  • A. N. Tal’nov


In experiments on cats we studied the pattern of EMG activity recorded from the flexors and extensors of the elbow joint and related to realization of flexor targeted operant movements of the forearm. The levels of stationary EMG activity generated by the flexors at a stabilized equilibrium position of the joint demonstrated no correlation with the values of joint angles. We suppose that this feature depends on manifestation of the hysteresis effects of muscle contraction. A target position was attained mostly due to the dynamic phases of muscle activity. The respective patterns of the movement-related activity of synergic muscles significantly differed; separate components related to leaving an equilibrium state with a certain acceleration and attaining a presettled equilibrium joint angle could be differentiated in this activity. Final positions of the forearm could be significantly different at equal levels of the stationary EMG activity generated during stabilization of these positions; they depended on specificities in the time course of dynamic phase of the activity (in particular, on the time of activity decay to a stationary level). We conclude that the movement of a limb link from one equilibrium position to another is mostly controlled via coordination of the dynamic phase of muscle activity.


Joint Angle Motor Command Biceps Brachii Dynamic Phase Elbow Flexor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. N. Tal’nov and A. I. Kostyukov, “Hysteresis aftereffects in human single-joint voluntary movements”,Neirofiziologiyal/Neurophysiology,26, No. 2, 83–90 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. N. Tal’nov, S. G. Serenko, V. L. Cherkassakii, and S. S. Strafun, “Coordination of the dynamic phases of EMG activity in human elbow flexors in the performance of targeted tracking movements”,Neirofizilogiya/Neurophysiology,30, No. 3, 212–225 (1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. N. Tal’nov, V. L. Cherkassky, and A. I. Kostyukov, “Movement-related and steady-state electromyographic activity of human elbow flexors in slow transition movements between two equilibrium states”,Neuroscience,79, 923–933 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. I. Kostyukov and A. N. Tal’nov, “Effects of torque disturbances on elbow joint movements evoked in unanesthetized cats by microstimulation of the motor cortex”,Exp. Brain Res.,84, 374–382 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Wallace, “An impulse-timing theory for reciprocal control of muscular activity in rapid, discrete movements”,J. Mot. Behav.,13, 144–160) 1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. J. Cooke and S. H. Brown, “Movement-related phasic muscle activation. 2. Generation and functional role of the triphasic pattern”,J. Neurophysiol.,63, 465–475 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. G. Fel’dman,Central and Reflex Mechanisms of the Movement Control [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Bizzi, A. Polit, and P. Morasso, “Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position”,J. Neurophysiol.,39, 435–444 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Bizzi, N. Accornero, W. Chapple, and N. Hogan, “Arm trajectory formation in monkeys”,Exp. Brain Res.,46, 139–143 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Bizzi, F. Mussa-Ivaldi, and S. Gistzer, “Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?”,Behav. Brain Sci.,15, 603–613 (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Hasan and R. M. Enoka, “Isometric torque-angle relationship and movement-related activity of human elbow flexors: implications for the quilibrium-point hypothesis”,Exp. Brain Res.,59, 441–450 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. Dovgalets
    • 1
  • A. N. Tal’nov
    • 1
  1. 1.Bogomolets Institute of PhysiologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations