Flower nectar of an autogamous perennialRorippa indica as an indirect defense mechanism against herbivorous insects
- 70 Downloads
This report shows that one of the most important roles of the flower nectar of an autogamous perennialRorippa indica (L.) Hieron is as an attractant for employing some ant species as a defense against herbivorous insects. The plant has flowers from spring to early winter. Its flower nectar is frequently stolen by some ant species (hereafter cited as ants) which also feed on small herbivorous insects on the plant. Internations among the tritrophic levels (R. indica, herbivores, ants) were experimentally examined and the followings became clear. (1) Ants were attracted toR. indica in search of its flower nectar. (2) The gradual secretion of flower nectar seemed to detain ants on the plant. (3)Pieris butterfly lavae were the major herbivores onR. indica and were potentially harmful to the plant. (4) The presence of ants reduced the survival rate ofP. rapae larvae onR. indica. (5) The presence of ants reduced the feeding damage toR. indica. (6) The disadvantage of nectar use by ants seemed to be minimal for the plant since the ants did not disturb the other flower visitors. These facts suggest a mutualistic relationship betweenR. indica and ants. That is, the flower nectar serves as an indirect defense against herbivorous insects.
Key wordsants autogamous plant flower nectar herbivorous insect indirect defense tritrophic levels
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dominguez, C. A., R. Dirzo and S. H. Bullock (1989) On the function of floral nectar inCroton suberosus (Euphorbiaceae)Oikos 56: 109–114.Google Scholar
- Gould, S. J. and E. S. Vrba (1982) Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form.Paleobiology 8: 4–15.Google Scholar
- Huxley, C. R. (1986) Evolution of benevolent ant-plant relationships. pp. 257–282.In B. E. Juniper and T. R. E. Southwood (eds.)Insects and the plant surface. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
- Huxley, C. R. (1989) Ants and plants: a diversity of interactions. pp. 1–14.In C. R. Huxley and D. F. Cutler (eds.)Ant-plant interactions. Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
- Kitamura, S. and G. Murata (1961)Coloured illustrations of Herbaceous Plants of Japan (Choripetalae). Hoikusha, Osaka. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Mound, L. A. (1962) Extrafloral nectaries of cotton and their secretions.Emp. Cotton Grow. Rev. 39: 254–261.Google Scholar
- Ojala, A. (1985) Variation ofAngelica archangelica subsp.rachangelica (Apiaceae) in northern Fennoscandia.Ann. Bot. Fennici. 22: 183–194.Google Scholar
- Ottosen, C. O. (1987) Male bumblebees (Bombs hortorum L.) as pollinators ofLonicera periclymenum L. in northeastern Zealand, Denmark.Flora (Jena)179: 155–161.Google Scholar
- Schemske, D. W. (1983) Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant-animal mutualisms. pp. 67–109.In M. H. Nitecki (ed.)Coevolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Yano, S. (1993) The plastic reproductive allocation of the cruciferous perennialRorippa indica in response to different degrees of feeding damage.Res. Popul. Ecol. 35: 349–359.Google Scholar
- Yano, S., and N. Ohsaki (1993) The phenology and intrinsic quality of wild crucifers that determine the community structure of their herbivorous insects.Res. Popul. Ecol. 35: 151–170.Google Scholar