Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 295–315 | Cite as

A population dynamic model of Batesian mimicry

  • Atsushi Yamauchi
Article

Summary

A population dynamic model of Batesian mimicry, in which populations of both model and mimetic species were considered, was analyzed. The probability of a predator catching prey on each encouter was assumed to depend on the frequency of the mimic. The change in population size of each species was considered to have two components, growth at the intrinsic growth rate and carrying capacity, and reduction by predation. For simplicity in the analyses, three assumptions were made concerning the carrying capacities of each population: (1) with no density effects on the mimic population growth rate; (2) with no density effects on the model species; and (3) with density effects on both species. The first and second cases were solved analytically, whereas the last was, for the most part, investigated numerically. Under assumption (1), two stable equilibria are possible, in which both species either coexist or go to extinction. Under assumption (2), there are also two stable equilibria possible, in which either only the mimic persists or both go to extinction. These results explain the field records of butterflies (Pachliopta aristolochiae and its mimicPapilio polytes) in the Ryukyu Islands, Japan.

Keywords

Batesian mimicry population dynamics model butterfly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brower, J. V. Z. (1960) Experimental studies of mimicry. IV. The reactions of starlings to different proportions of models and mimics.Am. Nat. 94: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charlesworth, D. and B. Charlesworth (1975a) Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry I. Single-locus models.J. theor. Biol. 55: 283–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charlesworth, D. and B. Charlesworth (1975b) Theoretical genetics of Batesian, mimicry. II. Evolution of supergenes.J. theor. Biol. 55: 305–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charlesworth, D. and B. Charlesworth (1975c) Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry. III. Evolution of dominance.J. theor. Biol. 55: 327–377.Google Scholar
  5. Emlen, J. M. (1968) Batesian mimicry: A preliminary theoretical investigation of quantitative aspects.Am. Nat. 102: 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holling, C. S. (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation.Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45: 1–60.Google Scholar
  7. Huheey, J. E. (1964) Studies of warning coloration and mimicry. IV. A mathematical model of model-mimic frequecies.Ecology 45: 185–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huheey, J. E. (1988) Mathematical models of mimicry.Am. Nat. 131: s22-s41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oaten, A., C. E. M. Pearce and M. E. B. Smyth (1975) Batesian mimicry and signal detection theory.Bull. Math. biol. 37: 367–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Turner, J. R. G. (1983) Mimicry: The palatability spectrum and its consequences. 141–161. In R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery (ed.)The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Turner, J. R. G., E. P. Kearney and L. S. Exton (1984) Mimicry and the Monte Carlo predator: the palatability spectrum and the origins of mimicry.Biol. J. Linn. Soci. 23: 247–268.Google Scholar
  12. Uesugi, K. (1991) Temporal change in records of the mimetic butterflyPapilio polytes with establishment of its modelPachliopta aristochiae in the Ryukyu Island.Jpn. J. Ent. 59: 183–198.Google Scholar
  13. Uesugi, K. (1992) Polymorphism and mimicry inPapilio polytes.Insectarium,27(6): 168–174. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Wickler, W. (1968)Mimicry in plants and animals. George Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd., London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Population Ecology 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Yamauchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations