Mind & Society

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 33–48 | Cite as

Models in science and mental models in scientists and nonscientists

  • William F. Brewer
Articles Section on “Commonsense and Scientific Reasoning”

Abstract

This paper examines the form of mental representation of scientific theories in scientists and nonscientists. It concludes that images and schemas are not the appropriate form of mental representation for scientific theories but that mental models and perceptual symbols do seem appropriate for representing physical/mechanical phenomena. These forms of mental representation are postulated to have an analogical relation with the world and it is this relationship that gives them strong explanatory power. It is argued that the construct of naïve theories as used in developmental psychology may be the appropriate form of mental representation for non physical/mechanical domains. The paper adopts a strong form of psychologism in the philosophy of science and argues that model-based approaches to scientific theories are more appropriate forms of representation for scientific theories than the formalist approaches that dominate current philosophy of science.

Keywords

Mental models scientific theories representation model-based theories perceptual symbols naïve theories formal models images schemas explanation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R. & Bower, G.H. (1973)Human Associative Memory (Washington DC, V.H. Winston).Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, B. (1986) The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils' preconceptions in science,European Journal of Science Education, 8, pp. 155–71.Google Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L.W., Yeh, W., Luka, B.J., Olseth, K.L., Mix, K.S. & Wu, L.-L. (1993) Concepts and meaning,CLS 29 (Chicago Linguistic Society), 2 (The Parasession), pp. 23–61.Google Scholar
  4. Barsalou, L.W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 577–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, F.C. (1932)Remembering (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Bell, J. (1986) John Bell, in P.C.W. Davies & J.R. Brown (Eds)The Ghost in the Atom (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
  7. Bohm, D. (1986) David Bohm, in P.C.W. Davies & J.R. Brown (Eds),The Ghost in the Atom (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 118–34.Google Scholar
  8. Boltzmann, L. (1886/1974) The second law of thermodynamics, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  9. Boltzmann, L. (1892/1974) On the methods of theoretical physics, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 5–12.Google Scholar
  10. Boltzmann, L. (1899/1974) On the development of the methods of theoretical physics in recent times, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
  11. Boltzmann, L. (1902) Models,The New Volumes of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10th edition, Vol. 30 (London, Adam and Charles Black), pp. 788–91Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, W.F. (1999a) Perceptual symbols: The power and limitations of a theory of dynamic imagery and structured frames,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 611–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brewer, W.F. (1999b) Scientific theories and naive theories as forms of mental representation: Psychologism revived,Science & Education 8, pp. 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, W.F. (2000) Bartlett's concept of the schema and its impact on theories of knowledge representation in contemporary cognitive psychology, in A. Saito (Ed.),Bartlett, Culture and Cognition (Hove UK, Psychology Press), pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
  15. Brewer, W.F. & Mishra, P. (1998) Science, in W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds),A Companion to cognitive Science (Oxford, Blackwell), pp. 744–9.Google Scholar
  16. Brewer, W.F. & Nakamura, G.V. (1984) The nature and functions of schemas, in R.S. Wyer Jr. & T.K. Srull (Eds),Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1 (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 119–60.Google Scholar
  17. Buchdahl, G. (1964) Theory construction: The work of Norman Robert Campbell,Isis, 55, pp. 151–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell, N.R. (1913)Modern Electrical Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, N.R. (1920/1957)Foundations of Science (New York, Dover) (originally published asPhysics: The Elements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
  20. Carey, S. (1985)Conceptual Change in Childhood (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).Google Scholar
  21. Clement, J. (2000) Model based learning as a key research area for science education,International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp. 1041–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins, A. (1985) Component models of physical systems, inProceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Irvine CA, pp. 80–9.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, A.M. & Quillian, M.R. (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, pp. 240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Craik, K.J.W. (1943)The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Cushing, J.T. (1991) Quantum theory and explanatory discourse: Endgame for understanding,Philosophy of Science, 58, pp. 337–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Kleer, J. & Brown, J.S. (1981) Mental models of physical mechanisms and their acquisition, in J.R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 285–309.Google Scholar
  27. Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978) Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students,Studies in Science Education, 5, pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
  28. Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (Eds) (1985)Children's Ideas in Science (Milton Keynes UK, Open University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Duhem, P. (1914/1991)The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. by P.P. Wiener (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) (original work published 1914).Google Scholar
  30. Eddington, A.S. (1928)The Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  31. Einstein, A. (1959) Autobiographical notes, in P.A. Schilpp (Ed.),Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1 (New York, Harper), pp. 2–95.Google Scholar
  32. Feynman, R.P. (1985) “Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!” (New York, Norton).Google Scholar
  33. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B. & Sands, M. (1964)The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 2:Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter (Reading MA, Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
  34. Gentner, D. & Stevens, A.L. (Eds.) (1983)Mental Models (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum).Google Scholar
  35. Gholson, B., Shadish, W.R. Jr., Neimeyer, R.A. & Houts, A.C. (Eds.) (1989)Psychology of Science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Giere, R.N. (1992)Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15 (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  37. Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C.J. (1998) Learning science through models and modelling, in B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.),International Handbook of Science Education, Vol. 1 (Dordrecht, Holland, Kluwer), pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
  38. Gobert, J.D. & Buckley, B.C. (2000) Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education,International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp. 891–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A.N. (1997)Words Thoughts, and Theories (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).Google Scholar
  40. Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H.M. (1992) Why the child's theory of mind reallyis a theory,Mind & Language, 7, pp. 145–71.Google Scholar
  41. Hempel, C.G. (1966)Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  42. Hesse, M. (1967) Models and analogy in science, in P. Edwards (Ed.),Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5 (New York, Macmillan), pp. 354–9.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980) Mental models in cognitive science,Cognitive Science, 4, pp. 71–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983)Mental Models (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Karmiloff-Smith, A. & Inhelder, B. (1975) “If you want to get ahead, get a theory”,Cognition, 3, pp. 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein, M.J. (1972) Mechanical explanation at the end of the nineteenth century,Centaurus, 17, pp. 58–82.Google Scholar
  47. Leatherdale, W.H. (1974)The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science (Amsterdam, North-Holland).Google Scholar
  48. Maxwell, J.C. (1890) Address to the mathematical and physical sections of the British Association, in W.D. Niven (Ed.),The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 215–29.Google Scholar
  49. McAllister, J.W. (1996)Beauty & Revolution in Science (Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  50. McMullin, E. (1968) What do physical models tell us?, in B. van Rootselaar & J.F. Staal (Eds),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III (Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam 1967) (Amsterdam, North-Holland), pp. 385–96.Google Scholar
  51. Mellor, D.H. (1968) Models and analogies in science: Duhemversus Campbell?Isis, 59, pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagel, E. (1961)The Structure of Science (New York, Harcourt, Brace and World).Google Scholar
  53. Nash, L.K. (1963)The Nature of the Natural Sciences (Boston, Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  54. Nussbaum, J. & Novick, S. (1982) Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy,Instructional Science, 11, pp. 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perner, J. (1991)Understanding the Representational Mind (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).Google Scholar
  56. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1991)Bibliography: Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 3rd ed. (Kiel, Germany, Institute for Science Education, University of Kiel).Google Scholar
  57. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change,Science Education, 66, pp. 211–27.Google Scholar
  58. Reiner, M., Chi, M.T.H. & Resnick, L. (1988) Naive materialistic belief: An underlying epistemological commitment. inProceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 544–51.Google Scholar
  59. Root-Bernstein, R.S. (1985) Visual thinking: The art of imagining reality,Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 75 (Part 6), pp. 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rumelhart, D.E. (1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition, in R.J. Spiro & B.C. Bruce and W.F. Brewer (Eds)Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
  61. Schwitzgebel, E. (1999) Children's theories and the drive to explain,Science & Education, 8, pp. 457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shepard, R.N. (1978) Externalization of mental images and the act of creation, in B.S. Randhawa & W.E. Coffman (Eds.),Visual Learning, Thinking, and Communication, (New York, Academic Press), pp. 133–89.Google Scholar
  63. Stevens, A.L. & Gentner, D. (1983) Introduction, in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds),Mental Models (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  64. Suppe, F. (Ed.) (1977),The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. (Urbana IL, University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
  65. Thomson, J.J. (1930)Tendencies of Recent Investigations in the Field of Physics (London, British Broadcasting Corporation).Google Scholar
  66. Thomson, W. (Lord Kelvin) (1884)Lectures on Molecular Dynamics (Baltimore MD, Johns Hopkins University).Google Scholar
  67. Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F. (1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle,Cognitive Science, 18, pp. 123–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wellman, H.M. (1990)The Child's Theory of Mind (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).Google Scholar
  69. Williams, M.D., Hollan, J.D. & Stevens, A.L. (1983) Human reasoning about a simple physical system, in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental Models, (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 131–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosenberg & Sellier, Fondazione Rosselli 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William F. Brewer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations