Mind & Society

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 39–69

Collective and joint intention

  • Raimo Tuomela
Articles Section on “Philosophy, Mind and Brain”


The paper discussed and analyzes collective and joint intentions of various strength. Thus there are subjectively shared collective intentions and intersubjectively shared collective intentions as well as collective intentions which are objectively and intersubjectively shared. The distinction between collective and private intentions is considered from several points of view. Especially, it is emphasized that collective intentions in the full sense are in the “we-mode”, whereas private intentions are in the “I-mode”. The paper also surveys recent discussion in the literature concerning the nature of collective and joint intention and defends the author's accounts against criticisms.


collective intention joint intention shared intention we-intention collectivity condition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Audi, R. (1994) Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe,Noûs, 28, pp. 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzer, W. & Tuomela, R. (1997b), A Fixed Point Approach to Collective Attitudes, in G. Holmström-Hintikka & R. Tuomela (Eds.),Contemporary Action Theory II, (Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 115–142.Google Scholar
  3. Bratman, M. (1992), Shared Cooperative Activity,The Philosophical Review, 101, pp. 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratman, M. (1993), Shared Intention,Ethics, 104, pp. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castelfranchi, C., Cesta, A., Conte, R., Miceli, M. (1993) Foundations for Interaction: The Dependence Theory, in P. Torasso (Ed.),Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Third Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag), pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, P. & Levesque, H. (1991) Teamwork,Noûs, 35, pp. 487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert, M. (1989)On Social Facts (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  8. Miller, S. (1992) Joint Action,Philosophical Papers XXI, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, S. (1995) Intentions, Ends and Joint Action,Philosophical Papers XXIV, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
  10. Rao, A., Georgeff, M., Sonenberg, E. (1992) Social Plans: A Preliminary Report, in E. Werner & Y. Demazeau (Eds.),Decentralized A.I. 3, (Amsterdam, North-Holland), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
  11. Scanlon, T. (1990) Promises and Practices,Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
  12. Searle, J. (1990) Collective Intentions and Actions, in P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack (Eds.),Intentions in Communication, (Cambridge-Mass, A Bradford Book-The MIT Press), pp. 401–415.Google Scholar
  13. Tuomela, R. (1984)A Theory of Social Action (Dordrecht and Boston, Synthese Library-Reidel Publishing Company).Google Scholar
  14. Tuomela, R. (1991) We Will Do It: An Analysis of Group-Intentions, Philosophy andPhenomenological Research, LI, pp. 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tuomela, R. (1995)The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Tuomela, R. (1996) Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Joint Intention, in N. Jennings & G. O'Hare (Eds.),Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, (New York, Wiley), pp. 487–503.Google Scholar
  17. Tuomela, R. (1998), Collective Goals and Cooperation, in X. Arrazola, K. Korta, F. Pelletier (Eds.),Discourse, Interaction, and Communication (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
  18. Tuomela, R. (2000)Cooperation: A Philosophical Study (Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers).Google Scholar
  19. Tuomela, R. & Balzer, W. (1999) Collective Acceptance and Collective Social Notions, Synthese, 117, pp. 175–205.Google Scholar
  20. Tuomela, R. & Miller, K. (1988) We-Intentions,Philosophical Studies, 53, pp. 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tuomela, R. & Bonnevier-Tuomela, M. (1997) From Social Imitation to Teamwork, in G. Holmström-Hintikka & R. Tuomela (Eds.),Contemporary Action Theory II (Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
  22. Velleman, J. (1997) How to Share an Intention?,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXII, pp. 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosenberg & Sellier, Fondazione Rosselli 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimo Tuomela
    • 1
  1. 1.Academy of Finland and University of Helsinki-Department of Philosophy00014 University of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations