Mind & Society

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 3–16

Individualism and holism: New controversies in the philosophy of social science

  • Pierre Demeulenaere


The concept of holism is of great use in philosophy of science. But its meaning does not correspond to the traditional use of holism in social sciences. The aim of the paper is to criticize an attempt to link the two meanings. Such a confusion derives from a misunderstanding of methodological individualism which is erroneously considered to be an atomism. Since the concepts of holism can be related to many different meanings, and since there are many different models of action (including different models of rationality) behind the concept of methodological individualism, the debate should be cautious of all those differences. The papers gives a brief survey of these and discusses specific theses expressed by Vincent Descombes to support holism in social sciences.


Atomism holism methodological individualism rationality rules 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boudon, R. (1995)Le juste et le vrai (Paris, Fayard)Google Scholar
  2. Bunge, M. (1996)Finding Philosophy in Social Sciences (Yale University Press, New Haven and London).Google Scholar
  3. Coleman, J. (1990)Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Demeulenaere, P. (1996)Homo Oeconomicus. Enquête sur la constitution d'un paradigme (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  5. Demeulenaere, P. (1997a)Histoire de la théorie sociologique (Paris, Hachette)Google Scholar
  6. Demeulenaere, P. (1997b) Compte-rendu de Mario Bunge: Finding Philosophy in Social Sciences, inL'Année sociologique, 47, 2.Google Scholar
  7. Descombes, V. (1995),La denrée mentale (Paris, Minuit).Google Scholar
  8. Descombes, V. (1996)Les institutions du sens (Paris, Minuit)Google Scholar
  9. Drouin, J-M. (1997) Contribution à l'histoire du holisme: la philosophie de Jan Christian Smuts, in C. Larrère (Ed.),La crise environnementale (Paris, INRA).Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. & Lepore, E. (1992)Holism: A Shopper's Guide (Oxford Blackwell).Google Scholar
  11. Frege, G. (1976)Logische Untersuchungen (Göttingen, Vandehhoeck).Google Scholar
  12. Levi-Strauss, C. (1950) Introduction à l'oeuvre de Marcel Mauss, in M. Mauss (Ed.),Sociologie et anthropologie (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G.H. (1934)Mind Self and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  14. Pettit, P. (1993),The Common Mind (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Picavet, E (1997), L'élargissement de l'individualisme méthodologique,Document "Archives du Centre Economie et Philosophie, THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise.Google Scholar
  16. Quine, W.V.O. (1953)From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L. (1978)Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosenberg & Sellier, Fondazione Rosselli 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Demeulenaere
    • 1
  1. 1.Maître de conférences à l'Université de Paris-SorbonneParis Cedex 06

Personalised recommendations