Advertisement

Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 195–208 | Cite as

Exploring collaborative problem solving in adulthood

  • Roger A. Dixon
  • Diane P. Fox
  • Lee Trevithick
  • Rebecca Brundin
Article

Abstract

Collaborative problem solving occurs in situations in which two or more individuals cooperate in appraising, representing, and solving a variety of cognitive tasks. Collaborative groups are the context for much everyday cognitive activity in adulthood. Collaboration has been explored as a means through which older adults may maintain high levels of performance, perhaps compensating for individual-level cognitive and neurological decline. This study explored the effects of collaboration (group size) and adult age on solving both fixed- and unrestricted-alternatives 20 Questions tasks. Younger (M=24.3 years) and older (M=67.9 years) adults were randomly assigned to one of three homogeneous group size conditions: individuals, dyads, and tetrads. Results indicated some dissociation between individual-level performance (poorer for older adults) and collaborative performance (better for older adults). For the fixed-alternatives task, older adults produced more of the relatively inefficient hypothesis-scanning questions than did younger adults. In contrast, older collaborative groups produced more of the efficient constraint-seeking questions than hhpothesis-scanning questions, and an amount equivalent to that of younger adults. Overall performance for the difficult unrestricted-alternatives task was less efficient for both younger and older adults. The roles of task type, group characteristics, and adult age are discussed.

Key words

Aging collaborative cognition compensation problem solving 20 questions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1981). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict.Developmental Psychology, 18, 894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arenberg, D. (1974). A longitudinal study of problem solving.Journal of Gerontology, 29, 650–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one?Child Development, 59, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bäckman, L., & Dixon, R. A. (1992). Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework.Psychological Bulletin, 112, 259–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986).Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.). (1996).Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, C. A., & Klaczynski, P. A. (1996). Practical intelligence and problem solving: Searching for perspectives. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.),Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging (pp. 323–358). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1996). Social cognitive development in adulthood and aging. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.),Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging (pp. 454–487). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Cavanaugh, J. C., Dunn, N. J., Mowery, D., Feller, C., Niederehe, G., Frugé, E., & Volpendesta, D. (1989). Problem-solving strategies in dementia patient-caregiver dyads.The Gerontologist, 29, 156–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damon, W. (1996). The lifelong transformation of moral goals through social influence. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.),Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 198–220). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Denney, N. W. (1979). Problem solving in later adulthood: Intervention research. In P. B. Baltes & O. J. Brim, Jr. (Eds.),Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 37–66). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Denney, N. W. (1980). Task demands and problem-solving ability strategies in middle-aged and older adults.Journal of Gerontology, 35, 559–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Denney, N. W. (1982). Aging and cognitive changes. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.),Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 807–827). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  14. Denney, N. W. (1994). The effects of training on basic cognitive processes: What do they tell us about the models of lifespan cognitive development?. In J. Sinnott (Ed.),Interdisciplinary handbook of adult lifespan learning. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  15. Denney, N. W., & Denney, N. W. (1973). The use of classification for problem solving: A comparison of middle and old age.Developmental Psychology, 9, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denney, N. W., & Denney, D. R. (1974). Modeling effects of questioning strategies of the elderly.Developmental Psychology, 10, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixon, R. A. (1992). Contextual approaches to adult intellectual development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.),Intellectual development (pp. 350–380). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, R. A. (1996). Collaborative memory and aging. In D. J. Herrmann, M. K. Johnson, C. L. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, & P. Hertel (Eds.),Basic and applied memory: Theory in context (pp. 359–383). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, R. A., & Bäckman, L. (Eds.). (1995).Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Dixon, R. A., & Gould, O. N. (1996). Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.),Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 221–241). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1979). Individual and collective conflicts of centrations in cognitive development.European Journal of Psychology, 9, 105–108.Google Scholar
  22. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976).Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  23. Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed intelligence.Research Bulletin 83, Department of Education, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  24. Gagnon, L. M. (1995).Collaborative remembering: Are there age-related differences in working with a spouse or with a stranger? Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, O. N., & Dixon, R. A. (1993). How we spent our vacation: Collaborative storytelling by young and old adults.Psychology and Aging, 8, 10–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould, O. N., Kurzman, D., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads.Discourse Processes, 17, 149–165.Google Scholar
  27. Greeno, J. G., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon.Cognitive Science, 17, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartwick, J., Sheppard, B. H., & Davis, J. H. (1982). Group remembering: Research and implications. In R. A. Guzzo (Ed.),Improving group decision making in organizations: Approaches from theory and research, (pp. 41–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: AreN +1 heads better than one?Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hupet, M., Chantraine, Y., & Nef, F. (1993). References in conversation between young and old normal adults.Psychology and Aging, 8, 339–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, N. L., & Sullaway, M. E. (1983). Group sex composition and member task motivation.Sex Roles, 9, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kesler, M. S., Denney, N. W., & Whitely, S. E. (1976). Factors influencing problem solving in middle-aged and elderly adults.Human Development, 9, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laughlin, P. R., & Jaccard, J. J. (1975). Social facilitation and observation of individuals and cooperative pairs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laughlin, P. R., & Shippy, T. A. (1983). Collective induction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meeker, B. F., & Wietzel-O'Neill, P. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups.American Sociological Review, 42, 91–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990).Collective remembering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Mosher, F. A., & Hornsby, J. R. (1966). On asking questions. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.),Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 86–102). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Paulus, P. B. (Ed.). (1989).The psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Rabbitt, P. (1977). Changes in problem solving ability in old age. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 606–625). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  40. Reese, H. W., & Rodeheaver, D. (1985). Problem solving and complex decision making. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging, (2nd ed., pp. 474–499). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  41. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991).Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  42. Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly.Language and Communication, 6, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salthouse, T. A. (1991).Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Staudinger, U. M. (1996). Wisdom and the social-interactive foundation of the mind. In P. B. Baltes, & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.),Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 276–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Steiner, I. D. (1972).Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, D. W., & Faust, W. I. (1952). Twenty questions: Efficiency in problem solving as a function of size of group.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 360–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Waern, Y (1992). Modelling group problem solving.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 200, 157–174.Google Scholar
  49. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen, & G. R. Goethals (Eds.),Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, B. A., & Watson, P. C. (1996). A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment.Memory, 4, 456–486.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger A. Dixon
    • 1
  • Diane P. Fox
    • 1
  • Lee Trevithick
    • 1
  • Rebecca Brundin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations