A developmental perspective on psychotherapy process, psychotherapists' expertise, and “Meaning-Making Conflict” within therapeutic relationships: Part II

  • Michael Basseches
Article

Abstract

Part I—A Dialectical-Constructivist View of Human Development, Psychotherapy, and the Dynamics of Meaning-Making Conflict Within Therapeutic Relationships-reviewed a dialectical-constructivist model of human development and articulated, in the language of that model, how psychotherapy, in general, works. It described and illustrated three generic processes which contribute to the frequent successes of an extremely diverse range of psychotherapy theories and practices. This view of psychotherapy focused on both the client's meaning-making processes and the therapist's meaning-making processes, and how they contribute together to effective psychotherapy. Part I also offered a way of understanding what is going on when therapeutic progress is blocked by conflict between the client's and the therapist's meaning-making processes. Part II—Dialectical, Thinking and Psychotherapeutic Expertise: Implications for Training Psychotherapists and Protecting Clients from ‘Theoretical Abuse’—explores those experiences in which the therapist's exercise of this or her own meaning-making structures, and maintenance of the integrity of his or her theories, has a limiting or destructive impact on the value of therapy to the client. It considers the concept of “theoretical abuse” by psychotherapists as a way of characterizing the most destructive of these experiences. This serves as a rhetorical device for introducing comparisons between these phenomena and the phenomena of sexual abuse by psychotherapists, in terms of dynamics, prevalence, and appropriate strategies for prevention. Part II uses work on the development of dialectical thinking in adulthood to conceptualize how different understandings of the nature of psychotherapists' theories and expertise increase or decrease the likelihood and severity of ‘theoretical abuse’. Finally, it derives implications for training psychologists and other psychotherapy professionals.

Key Words

Psychotherapy adult development dialectical thinking relativistic thinking universalistic-formal thinking meaning-making conflict theory abuse attention interpretation enactment psychotherapists' expertise psychotherapy training dialectical-constructivist 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1937).Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychologist. (1996). Special issue: Outcome assessment of psychotherapy 51(10).Google Scholar
  3. Basseches, M. (1978) Beyond closed-system problem-solving: A study of meta-systematic aspects of mature thought (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University). Ann Arbor, MI University Microfilms No. 7918210.Google Scholar
  4. Basseches, M. (1984).Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  5. Basseches, M. (1989). Intellectual development: The development of dialectical thinking. In E. P. Maimon, B. F. Nodine, & F. W. O'Connor (Eds.).Thinking, reasoning and writting. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Basseches, M. (1997). A developmental perspective on psychotherapy process, psychotherapists' expertise, and ‘meaning-making conflict’ within therapeutic relationships: A two-part series.Journal of Adult Development, 4, 17–33.Google Scholar
  7. Basseches, M. (in preparation).Dialectical and relativistic thinking within constructivist approaches to psychotherapy. A review of Constructivism in Psychotherapy (Neimeyer and Mahoney, Eds.).Google Scholar
  8. Benack, S. (1981).The development of relativistic epistemological thought and the growth of empathy in late adolescence and early adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, R. J. (1976).The restructuring of social and political, theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  10. Bopp, M. J. (1984).A study of dialectical metatheory in psychotherapy (Doctoral dissertation, Tèmple University). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms No. 1416.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, J. M., & Frawley, M. G. (1994).Treating adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Dawes, R. M. (1994).House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, A. (1979). Toward a new theory of personalty. In A. Ellis & J. M. Whitely (Eds.),Theoretical and empirical foundations of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 7–32). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  15. Greenberg, L., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). A dialectical-constructivist approach to experiential change. In R. A. Neimeyer, & M. J. Mahoney (Eds.),Constructivism in psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1971).Knowledge and human interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958).The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Kegan, R. G. (1982).The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kegan, R. G. (1994).In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kramer, D. A. (1986). Relativistic and dialectical thought in three adult age groups.Human Development, 29, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. S. (1958).The structure of scientific revollutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Loevinger, J. (1976).Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Marx, K. (1967).Writings of the young Marx on philosophy and society (L. D. Easton, & K. H. Guddat, Eds.), Garden, City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  24. McCarthy, T. (1978).The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mead, M. (1928).Coming of age in Samoa. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  26. Meichenbaum, D. (1977).Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  27. Neimeyer, R. A. (1995). Constructivist psychotherapies: Features, foundations and future directions. In R. A. Neimeyer & M. J. Mahoney (Eds.),Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 11–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neimeyer, R. A., & Mahoney, M. J. (Eds.). (1995).Constructivism in psychotherapy, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  29. Perry, W. G. (1968).Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  30. Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. Chickering (Ed.),The American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Piaget, J. (1967).Six psychological studies. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Basseches
    • 2
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Study CounselHarvard UniversityCambridge
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySuffolk UniversityBoston

Personalised recommendations