Environmental Geology and Water Sciences

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 205–213 | Cite as

The effects of a gas well blow out on groundwater chemistry

  • Walton Ross Kelly
  • Gerald Matisoff
  • J. Berton Fisher
Article

Abstract

Water wells were sampled near North Madison, Ohio, following a gas well blow out that injected large amounts of CH4 into near-surface groundwater Chemical analyses showed elevated levels of Fe+2, Mn+2, Ca+2, sulfide, alkalinity, and pH, and low levels of dissolved oxygen, SO4 −2, and NO3 − in CH4-affected wells compared to unaffected wells. Sulfate reduction is quantitatively the most important vehicle for CH4 oxidation Equilibrium thermodynamic computer models were used to simulate groundwaters from the North Madison area Model results showed that CH4 is oxidized to HCO3 −, SO4 −2 is reduced, iron and manganese oxides are reduced and dissolved, and pH increases These simulations are in excellent agreement with trends observed in the field data A laboratory experiment was designed to simulate CH4 − perturbed groundwater in the methane-perturbed system, sulfide increased significantly, providing direct evidence for methane oxidation by sulfate reduction

Although suitable anaerobic methane-oxidizing bacteria have not been isolated from groundwater aquifers, the combination of field data, laboratory experiment, and computer simulation form a convincing argument that CH4 perturbation of aquifers can and does affect groundwater chemistry

Keywords

Alkalinity Sulfate Reduction Methane Oxidation Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Lake County 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Back, W, and I. Barnes, 1965, Relation of electrochemical potentials and iron content to groundwater flow patterns:U.S. Geol. Surv, Prof. Pap. 498-C Google Scholar
  2. Baedecker, M. J., and W. Back, 1979, Hydrogeological processes and chemical reactions at a landfill.Ground Water, v. 17, p. 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, J. W., E. A. Jenne, and D. K. Nordstrom, 1979, WATEQ2—a computerized chemical model for trace and major element speciation and mineral equilibria of natural waters,in E. A. Jenne, ed., Chemical Modeling in Aqueous Systems: Amer Chem. Soc Symp. Ser no. 93, p 815–835Google Scholar
  4. Ball, J. W., D. K. Nordstrom, and E. A. Jenne, 1980, Additional and revised thermochemical data and computer code for WATEQ2—a computerized chemical model for trace and major element speciation and mineral equilibria of natural waters:U.S. Geol. Surv Water-Resources Investigation, p. 78–116.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, J. F., and P. Fritz, 1981a, The occurrence and origin of methane in some groundwater flow systems.Can. J. Earth Sci, v 18, p. 1802–1816.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, J. F., and P. Fritz, 1981b, Carbon isotope fractionation during microbial methane oxidation.Nature, v. 293, p. 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, R. O., and E. D. Goldberg, 1976. Methane production and consumption in anoxic marine sediments.Geology, v. 4, p. 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beebe, R. R., and H. W. Rauch, 1979, Lineaments and ground-water chemistry as exploration tools for Devonian shale gas in the Midway-Extra field of West Virginia,in H. Barlow, ed., Proceedings of the Third Eastern Gas Shales Symposium: 1979, U.S.D.O.E. Morgantown Energy Technology Center, p. 277–289.Google Scholar
  9. Cappenberg, T. E., 1975, A study of mixed continuous cultures by sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria.Microbial Ecol., v. 2, p. 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherry, J. A., A. J. Shaikh, D. E. Tallman, and R. V. Nicholson, 1979, Arsenic species as an indicator of redox conditions in groundwater.J Hydrol, v. 43, p. 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devol, A. H., 1983, Methane oxidation rates in the anaerobic sediments of Saanich Inlet.Limnol Oceanogr, v. 28, p. 738–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devol, A. H., and S. I. Ahmed, 1981, Are high rates of sulfate reduction associated with anaerobic methane oxidation?:Nature, v. 291, p. 407–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dohnalek, D. A., and J. A. Fitzpatrick, 1983, The chemistry of reduced sulfur species and their removal from ground-water supplies.Am Water Works Assoc J., v. 75, p. 298–308.Google Scholar
  14. Drozd, R. J., 1981, Monitoring hydrocarbon migration by the application of carbon and oxygen isotopic methods to carbonate species dissolved in groundwater: Abs. Am. Chem. Soc. Conf., Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  15. Dyck, W., A. K. Chatterjee, D. E. Gemmell, and K. Murricane, 1976, Well water trace element reconnaissance, eastern maritime Canada,J Geochem Exploration, v 6, p 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EPA, 1979, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes: Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. EPA-600/4-79-020.Google Scholar
  17. Ferry, J. G., and H. D. Peck, 1977, Relationship between sulfate reduction and methane production in salt marsh sediments: Abs. Ann. Meeting Am. Soc. Microbiology, N49, p. 236.Google Scholar
  18. Gunsalus, R. P., J. G. Zeikus, and R. S. Wolfe, 1972, Microbial modification of ground waters: Univ. of Ill. Water Resources Center, Research Report no. 57.Google Scholar
  19. Hallberg, R. O., and R. Martinell, 1976, Vyredox—in situ purification of ground water:Ground Water, v 14, p. 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglis, J. M., 1982, Nitrate contamination in a shallow, unconfined aquifer in Perry, Ohio: M.S thesis, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  21. Jannasch, H. W., 1975, Methane oxidation in Lake Kivu [central Africa],Limnol Oceanogr., v. 20, p. 860–864Google Scholar
  22. Jones, D. S., and H. W. Rauch, 1978, Lineaments and ground-water quality as exploration tools for ground water and gas in the Cottageville area of western West Virginia: Proceedings of the Second Eastern Gas Shales Symposium, 1978, U.S.D.O.E. Morgantown Energy Technology Center, p. 196–205.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, W. R., 1983, The effects of methane perturbation on the chemistry and quality of ground water systems: M.S. thesis, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  24. Kramer, L., 1983, Madison gas well blowout, August, 1982: Lake County, Ohio, General Health District Report.Google Scholar
  25. Kuznetsov, S. I., 1970, The microflora of lakes and its geochemical activity: Univ. of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Langmuir, D., 1978, Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits:Geochim Cosmochim Acta, v. 42, p. 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martens, C. S., and R. A. Berner, 1977, Interstitial water chemistry of anoxic Long Island Sound sediments 1 Dissolved gases:Limnol Oceanogr, v 22, p 10–25.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, G. J., W. S. Dockins, G. A. McFeters, and W. P. Iverson, 1981, Sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria from deep aquifers in Montana:Geomicrobiol J, v. 2, p. 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oremland, R. S., and B. F. Taylor, 1978, Sulfate reduction and methano-genesis in marine sediments:Geochim Cosmochim Acta, v 42, p 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parkhurst, D L., D C Thorstenson, and L. N. Plummer, 1980, PHREEQE—A computer program for geochemical calculations:U S Geol Surv Water-Resources Investigation, p. 80–96.Google Scholar
  31. Reeburg, W. S., 1976, Methane consumption in Cariaco Trench waters and sediments.Earth Planet Sci Lett., v 28, p. 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reeburgh, W S, 1980, Anerobic methane oxidation: Rate depth distributions in Skan Bay sediments.Earth Planet Sci Lett. v. 47, p 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reeburgh, W. S., and D T Heggie, 1977, Microbial methane consumption reactions and their effect on methane distributions in freshwater and marine environments:Limnol Oceanogr, v 22, p. 1–9.Google Scholar
  34. Rand, M C., A. E. Greenberg, and M. J. Taras, eds., 1975, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: Am Pub. Health Assoc.Google Scholar
  35. Rudd, J. W. M., A. Furutani, R. J. Flett, and R. D. Hamilton, 1976, Factors controlling methane oxidation in shield lakes: The role of nitrogen fixation and oxygen consumption.Limnol. Oceanogr, v. 21, p. 357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudd, J. W. M., and R. D. Hamilton, 1979, Methane cycling in Lake 227 in perspective with some components of carbon and oxygen cycles.Arch. Hydrobiol Beth. Ergebn Limnol, v. 12, p. 115–122.Google Scholar
  37. Rudd, J. W. M., R. D. Hamilton, and N. E. R. Campbell, 1974, Measurement of microbial oxidation of methane in lake water:Limnol Oceanogr, v. 19, p. 519–524.Google Scholar
  38. Schmidt, J J, 1978, The groundwater resources of Lake County, Ohio:Ohio Dept Nat Res, Div of WaterGoogle Scholar
  39. Solorzano, L., 1969, Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method:Limnol Oceanogr, v. 14, p 799–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stookey, L. L., 1970,Analytical Chemistry, v 42, p. 779–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stumm, W., and J. J. Morgan, 1981,Aquatic Chemistry, New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  42. Thorestenson, D C., D W Fisher, and M G Croft, 1979, The geochemistry of the Fox Hills-Basal Hell Creek Aquifer in southwestern North Dakota and northwestern South Dakota:Water Resources Res, v. 15, p 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  43. White, G. W., 1980, Glacial geology of Lake County, Ohio: Dept. Nat. Res., Div. Geol. Surv. Dept of Invest no 117Google Scholar
  44. Winfrey, I R, and J G Zeikus, 1977, Effects of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments:Appl. Environ Microbiol, v 33, p. 275Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walton Ross Kelly
    • 1
  • Gerald Matisoff
    • 1
  • J. Berton Fisher
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhio
  2. 2.Amoco Production CompanyTulsa

Personalised recommendations