American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 677–697 | Cite as

Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development

  • Stephen B. Fawcett
  • Adrienne Paine-Andrews
  • Vincent T. Francisco
  • Jerry A. Schultz
  • Kimber P. Richter
  • Rhonda K. Lewis
  • Ella L. Williams
  • Kari J. Harris
  • Jannette Y. Berkley
  • Jacqueline L. Fisher
  • Christine M. Lopez
Article

Abstract

Models of community empowerment help us understand the process of gaining influence over conditions that matter to people who share neighborhoods, workplaces, experiences, or concerns. Such frameworks can help improve collaborative partnerships for community health and development. First, we outline an interactive model of community empowerment that describes reciprocal influences between personal or group factors and environmental factors in an empowerment process. Second, we describe an iterative framework for the process of empowerment in community partnerships that includes collaborative planning, community action, community change, capacity building, and outcomes, and adaptation, renewal, and institutionalization. Third, we outline activities that are used by community leadership and support organizations to facilitate the process of community empowerment. Fourth, we present case stories of collaborative partnerships for prevention of substance abuse among adolescents to illustrate selected enabling activities. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities of facilitating empowerment with collaborative partnerships for community health and development.

Key Words

empowerment collaboration health coalitions prevention community development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albee, G. W. (1982). Preventing psychotherapy and promoting human potential.American Psychologist, 37, 1043–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985).Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Chavis, D. M., Florin, P., & Felix, M. R. J. (1993). Nurturing grassroots initiatives for community development: The role of enabling systems. In T. Mizrahi & J. Morrison, (Eds.),Community organization and social administration (pp. 41–67). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  4. Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheadle, A. (1995).After the trials: Using “prospective case studies” to evaluate community-based programs. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, L. L., Durkin, M. S., Kuhn, L., O'Connor, P., Barlow, B., & Heagarty, M. C. (1994). The impact of the safe kids/healthy neighborhoods injury prevention program in Harlem.American Journal of Public Health, 84, 580–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D'Onofrio, C. N. (1992). Theory and the empowerment of health education practitioners.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 385–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eng, E., Salmon, M. E., & Mullan, F. (1992). Community empowerment: The critical base for primary health care.Family and Community Health, 15, 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Etzioni, A. (1993).The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  11. Fawcett, S. B. (1990). Some emerging standards for community research and action. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. E. Jason (Eds.),Researching community psychology: Integrating theories and methodologies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 24, 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fawcett, S. B., Lewis, R. L., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V., Richter, K., Williams, E., & Copple, E. (in press). Evaluating community coalitions for the prevention of substance abuse: The case of Project Freedom.Health Education Quarterly.Google Scholar
  14. Fawcett, S. B., Paine, A. L., Francisco, V. T., Richter, K. P., & Lewis, R. K. (1994).Conducting preventive interventions for community mental health. Commissioned paper for the Committee on Prevention and Mental Disorders, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Fawcett, S. B., Paine, A. L., Francisco, V. T., & Vliet, M. (1993). Promoting health through community development. In D. Glenwick & L. A. Jason (Eds.), Promoting health and mental health: Behavioral approaches to prevention. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  16. Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V., Richter, K., Lewis, R., Williams, E., Harris, K., & Winter-Green, K. (1994).Preventing adolescent substance abuse: An action planning guide for community-based initiatives. Lawrence: Work Group on Health Promotion & Community Development, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  17. Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., Harris, K. J., Williams, E. L., Berkley, J. Y., Lopez, C. M., & Fisher, J. L. (1995). Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In D. Fetterman, A. S. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.),Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. (pp. 161–187). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, T., Whang, P. L., Muiu, C., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1982). Involving consumers in decision-making.Social Policy, 13, 36–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fawcett, S. B., White, G. W., Balcazar, F., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Mathews, R., Paine, A., Seekins, T., & Smith, J. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with disabilities.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Francisco, V. T., Paine, A. L., & Fawcett, S. B. (1993). A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions.Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 8, 403–416.Google Scholar
  21. Gabor, A. (1990).The man who discovered quality. New York: Time Books.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (1979).Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gowen, J. W. (1952). Humoral and cellular elements in natural and acquired resistance to typhoid.American Journal of Human Genetics, 4, 285–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, B. (1991).Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Green, L. W. (1986). The theory of participation: A qualitative analysis of its expression in national and international health policies.Advances in Health Education and Promotion, 1, 211–236.Google Scholar
  26. Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1991).Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  27. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (1992).Communities that care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Himmelman, A. T. (1992).Communities working collaboratively for a change. (Monograph available from the author, 1406 West Lake, Suite 209, Minneapolis, MN 55408)Google Scholar
  29. Horowitz, F. D. (1987).Exploring developmental theories: Toward a structural/behavioral model of development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schultz, A., and Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control.Health Education Quarterly, 21, 149–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Labonte, R. (1994). Health promotion and empowerment: Reflections on professional practice.Health Education Quarterly, 21, 253–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lappè, F. M., & DuBois, P. M. (1994).The quickening of America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mondros, J. B., & Wilson, S. M. (1994).Organizing for power and empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1993). Assessing community health concerns and implementing a microgrant program for self-help initiatives.American Journal of Public Health, 84, 316–318.Google Scholar
  36. Price, R. H., Cioci, M., Penner, W., & Trautlein, B. (1990, April).School and community support programs that enhance adolescent health and education. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.Google Scholar
  37. Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuels, S. E. (1990). Project LEAN: A national campaign to reduce dietary fat consumption.American Journal of Health Promotion, 4, 435–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarason, S. B., & Lorentz, E. (1979).The challenge of the resource exchange network. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Steckler, A., & Goodman, R. M. (1989). How to institutionalize health promotion programs.American Journal of Health Promotion, 3, 34–44.Google Scholar
  41. Tocqueville, A. de (1969).Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, Trans.: J. P. Mayer, Ed.). New York: Doubleday. (original work published 1935)Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994). Reported vaccine-preventable disease—United States, 1993, and the childhood immunization initiative.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 43, 57–60.Google Scholar
  43. Vincent, M. L., Clearie, A. F., & Schluchter, M. D. (1987). Reducing adolescent pregnancy through school and community-based education.Journal of the American Medical Association, 257, 3382–3386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wallerstein, N. (1992). Powerless, empowerment, and health: Implications for health promotion programs.American Journal of Health Promotion, 6(3), 197–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems.American Psychologist, 39, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wheatley, M. J. (1992).Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson-Brewer, R., Cohen, S., O'Donnell, L., & Goodman, I. F. (1991).Violence prevention for young adolescents: A survey of the state of the art. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.Google Scholar
  48. Wolff, T. (1992).Coalition building: One path to empowered communities. Amherst, MA: Community Partners.Google Scholar
  49. Yin, R. K. (1988).Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Zimmerman, M. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimmerman, M. (in press). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organization, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),The handbook of community psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zimmerman, M., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control and psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen B. Fawcett
    • 1
  • Adrienne Paine-Andrews
  • Vincent T. Francisco
  • Jerry A. Schultz
  • Kimber P. Richter
  • Rhonda K. Lewis
  • Ella L. Williams
  • Kari J. Harris
  • Jannette Y. Berkley
  • Jacqueline L. Fisher
  • Christine M. Lopez
  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentUniversity of KansasLawrence

Personalised recommendations