Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 288, Issue 8, pp 436–441

Correlations between histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch

  • Ulf Darsow
  • Johannes Ring
  • Eckehard Scharein
  • Burihart Bromm
Original Paper


Correlations between the skin reactions wheal and flare and the subjectively reported degree of itch were investigated in response to 1% histamine, intradermally applied by standardized skin prick and by iontophoresis. Experiments were performed with 15 male volunteers using a threefold repeated measures design (skin prick, and iontophoresis with 0.13 mA for 10 s and with 2.0 mA for 10 s). Skin reactions (perpendicular diameters) were determined at the time of their maximum (10 min). Itch was rated on a computerized visual analogue scale which was anchored upon the individual scratch threshold. Most effective in producing itch was the skin prick which caused strong sensations markedly above the scratch threshold during the entire period of measurement (30 min), whereas iontophoresis induced only transient itch sensations. On the other hand, the largest wheals were generated by iontophoresis of both intensities (mean 10 or 14 mm vs 6 mm with skin prick). The higher current induced higher itch, wheal and flare responses, but after eliminating this effect of stimulus intensity, no correlations were found. In contrast, skin prick-induced flare reactions varied with the degree of itch above the scratch threshold (r=0.56;P<0.01). Repeated measurements showed a higher stability for the itch reaction with skin prick compared with iontophoresis. It is hypothesized that in iontophoresis the brief (10-s) histamine bolus passed the most superficial pruritoceptive C fibres too quickly to induce long-lasting itch sensations, whereas the skin prick caused a deposit at the dermal-epidermal junction releasing histamine during the entire time of measurement. Consequently, both the C fibre-mediated itch and the axon reflex flare were more pronounced with the skin prick, and the wheal resulting from a permeability increase in the postcapillary venule walls was an independent phenomenon.

Key words

Histamine itch Wheal Flare Skin prick Iontophoresis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bromm B (1989) Laboratory animals and human volunteers in the assessment of analgesic efficacy. In: Chapman RC, Loeser H (eds) Issues in pain measurement. Raven Press, New York, pp 117–144Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bromm B, Treede RD (1991) Laser-evoked cerebral potentials in the assessment of cutaneous pain sensitivity in normal subjects and patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 147:625–643Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bromm B, Scharein E, Darsow U, Ring J (1995) Effects of menthol and cold on histamine-induced itch and skin reactions in man. Neurosci Lett 187:157–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorsch W, Ring J (1990) Exudate from human wheal and flare reactions. In: Dorsch W (ed) Late phase allergic reactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hägermark Ö, Wahlgren CF (1992) Some methods for evaluating clinical itch and their application for studying pathophysiological mechanisms. J Dermatol Sci 4:55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Handwerker HO, Forster C, Kirchhoff C (1991) Discharge patterns of human C-fibers induced by itching and burning stimuli. J Neurophysiol 66:307–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hearin DL, Mori PP (1950) A study of some anti-histamine compounds by histamine iontophoresis. J Invest Dermatol 14: 391–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heyer G, Hornstein OP, Handwerker HO (1991) Reactions to intradermally injected substance P and topically applied mustard oil in atopic dermatitis patients. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 71:291–295Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keele CA, Armstrong D (1964) Substances producing pain and itch. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis T (1927) The blood vessels of the human skin and their responses. Shaw & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindahl O (1961) Experimental skin pain. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 51:179Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magerl W, Handwerker HO (1988) A reliable model of experimental itching by iontophoresis of histamine. In: Dubner R, Gebhart GF, Bond MR (eds) Pain research and clinical management, vol 3. Proceedings Vth World Congress on Pain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 536–540Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magerl W, Westerman RA, Möhner B, Handwerker HO (1990) Properties of transdermal histamine iontophoresis: differential effects of season, gender and body region. J Invest Dermatol 94: 347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malling HJ (1993) Methods of skin testing. In: Dreborg S, Frew A (eds) Allergen standardization and skin tests. Position Paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy [Suppl] 14:55–56Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norusis MJ (1992) SPSS for Windows. Advanced statistics. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pepys J (1975) Skin testing. Br J Hosp Med 14:412–417Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry DJ, Falk MS, Pillsbury DM (1948) A comparison of the effect of antihistamine drugs in human subjects by means of histamine iontophoresis. J Invest Dermatol 2:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ring J, Sedlmeier F, Helm D von der, Mayr T, Walz U, Ibel H, Riepel H, Przybilla B, Reimann HJ, Dorsch W (1986) Histamine and allergic diseases. In: Ring J, Burg G (eds) New trends in allergy II. Springer, Berlin New York, pp 44–77Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt R, Jörum E, Torebjörk E (1993) Magnitude and projection of pain and itch evoked by intraneural microstimulation (abstract). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 87:137Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shelley WB, Arthur RP (1957) The neurohistology and neurophysiology of the itch sensation in man. Arch Dermatol 76: 296–323Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simone DA, Ngeow JY, Whitehouse J, Becerra-Cabal L, Putterman GJ, LaMotte RH (1987) The magnitude and duration of itch produced by intracutaneous injections of histamine. Somatosens Res 5:81–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simone DA, Alreja M, LaMotte RH (1991) Psychophysical studies of the itch sensation and itchy skin (“alloknesis”) produced by intracutaneous injection of histamine. Somatosens Mot Res 3:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tausk F, Christian E, Johansson O, Milgram S (1993) Neurobiology of the skin. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Freedberg IM, Austen KF (eds) Dermatology in general medicine, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 396–403Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Toth-Kasa I, Janeso G, Bognar A, Husz S, Obal F (1986) Capsaicin prevents histamine-induced itching. Int J Clin Pharm Res 6:163–169Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Woodward DF, Conway JL, Wheeler LA (1985) Cutaneous itching models. In: Maibach HI, Lowe NJ (eds) Models in Dermatology, vol 1. Karger, Basel, pp 187–195Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Darsow
    • 1
  • Johannes Ring
    • 2
  • Eckehard Scharein
    • 1
  • Burihart Bromm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyUniversity Hospital EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyTechnical University MunichMunich

Personalised recommendations