New Zealand higher education in the age of the global virtual university

  • Cathy Gunn
  • Mimi M. Recker
Departments International Review


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Campus Review. (2000, September 20).Online learning's fantasy world, p. 4.Google Scholar
  2. Darnton, R. (1999). The new age of the book.New York Review of Books, 48(5), 5–7.Google Scholar
  3. Evans J. (1999),Diploma in business extended learning option evaluation report, [On-line]. CPD, University of Auckland. Available: Scholar
  4. Future education shocks. (2000, September 24).New Zealand Education Review, p. 16.Google Scholar
  5. Gunn, C. (2000). After sales service and software: A considered response to the profit based theory of flexible learning.Proceedings of the Distance Education Association of New Zealand Annual Conference, University of Otago, Dunedin.Google Scholar
  6. Gunn, C., & Barnett, J. (2000). On-line learning: A quality experience. In P. Roberts & M. Chambers, (Eds.),Digital Developments in Higher Education. Taylor Graham: London.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, C. (1994). Obstacles to the integration of university qualifications and courses into the national qualifications framework.Higher Education in New Zealand: Occasional Paper Number 1, Syndicate of Educational Development Centres of New Zealand Universities, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  8. Hamalinen, M., Whinston, A., & Vishik, S. (1996). Electronic markets for learning: Education brokerage on the Internet.Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loose, C. (2000, March 15). On-line education to be free.The Washington Post, p. AO1.Google Scholar
  10. Luke, T. (1997, September).Political economy of the virtual university. Invited talk presented at Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Education. (1997). Tertiary education review: Green paper. [On-line]. Available: Scholar
  12. Ministry of Education. (1998). Tertiary education policy directions for the 21st century: White paper. [Online] Available: cument_page.cfm?id=4715Google Scholar
  13. NOble, D. (1997, 1998). Digital diploma mills, parts 1–4. [On-line]. Available: Scholar
  14. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1998).Education at a glance: OECD indicators 1998. Washington, DC: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999).What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.Google Scholar
  16. Recker, M. (1998). The virtual university: A smart card approach to education?Educational Technology Review, 10, 25–31.Google Scholar
  17. Recker, M., & Gunn, C. (1999). The global virtual university: International perspectives. InProceedings of RUFIS (Role of Universities in the Future Information Society) '99. AZ: Norrthern Arizona University.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, P., & Peters, M. (1998). Information technology and tertiary education in New Zealand.First Monday,3(12). [On-line]. Available
  19. Steinfeld, C., & Whitten, P. (1999). Community level socio-economic impacts of electronic commerce. Available at: (Visited 9 May 2001).Google Scholar
  20. TEAC, (Tertiary Education Advisory Committee). (2000). [On-line]. Available: Scholar
  21. Young, S., Dewstow, R., & McSporran, M. (1999).Who wants to learn online? Which students benefit from the changing learning environment? Paper presented to National Advisory Council for Computing Qualifications Annual Conference, Dunedin, NZ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathy Gunn
  • Mimi M. Recker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Instructional Technology at Utah State UniversityLogan

Personalised recommendations