Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning
- 1.9k Downloads
This introduction to the special issue provides a context for the contributing articles. for readers who are not familiar with cognitive load theory (CLT), it provides a very brief description of assumptions regarding memory systems and learning processes, different types of cognitive load (intrinsic, extraneous, and germane), and design implications. Whereas traditional CLT research focused on instructional methods to decrease extraneous cognitive load that is not directly relevant for learning, contributions to this special issue represent wider perspectives that reflect new developments in CLT. These articles have been organized into three categories: (a) methods to decrease intrinsic cognitive load, and deal with high-element interactivity materials, (b) methods to increase germane cognitive load that is directly relevant for learning, and (c) methods to deal with differences in learner's individual levels of expertise and expertise development. To conclude, design implications for (adaptive) e-learning are discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.). (2002). Cognitive load theory.Learning and Instruction,12(1), Whole Issue.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (2001).Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (Eds.). (2003). Cognitive load theory.Educational Psychologist,38(1), Whole Issue.Google Scholar
- Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive load theory.Instructional Science,32(1–2), Whole Issue.Google Scholar
- Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition,17, 398–422.Google Scholar