Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study

  • Joan L. Whipp
  • Stephannie Chiarelli
Article

Abstract

Little is known about how successful students in Web-based courses self-regulate their learning. This descriptive case study used a social cognitive model of self-regulated learning (SRL) to investigate how six graduate students used and adapted traditional SRL strategies to complete tasks and cope with challenges in a Web-based technology course; it also explored motivational and environmental influences on strategy use. Primary data sources were three transcribed interviews with each of the students over the course of the semester, a transcribed interview with the course instructor, and the students' reflective journals. Archived course documents, including transcripts of threaded discussions and student Web pages, were secondary data sources. Content analysis of the data indicated that these students used many traditional SRL strategies, but they also adapted planning, organization, environmental structuring, help seeking, monitoring, record keeping, and self-reflection strategies in ways that were unique to the Web-based learning environment. The data also suggested that important motivational influences on SRL strategy use—self-efficacy, goal orientation, interest, and attributions—were shaped largely by student successes in managing the technical and social environment of the course. Important environmental influences on SRL strategy use included instructor support, peer support, and course design. Implications for online course instructors and designers, and suggestions for future research are offered.

References

  1. Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospectus.Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk, & J. L. Meece (Eds)Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Arvan, I., Ory, J. C., Bullock, C. D. Burnaska, K. K., & Hanson, M. (1998): The SCALE efficiency projects.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,2(2). Retrieved February 21, 2004 from http://www. alnresearch.org/Data_Files/articles/full_text/arv an2.htm.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, S., Greer, J., McCalla, G., & Kettel, L. (May, 2001). Help-seeking in an asynchronous help forum. In R. Luckin (Ed.)Proceedings of workshop on help provision and help seeking in interactive learnign environments. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, San Antonio. Retrieved February 21, 2004 from http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users /bend/aied2001/bull.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) (2000).Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, D. W., Nolan, D. E., & Gallagher, S. M. (2001).Web-teaching: A guide to designing interactive teaching for the World Wide Web (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Cennamo, K. S., & Ross, J. D. (2000)Strategies to support self-directed learning in a Web-based course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  10. Clark D. (1999). Getting results with distance education.The American Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 38–51.Google Scholar
  11. Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Corno, L., & Mandinich, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.Google Scholar
  13. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style.Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eastmond, D. V. (1995).Alone but together: Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago:Aldine.Google Scholar
  16. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment.The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics.Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45(4), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiltz, S. R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2. Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org /publications/jaln/v1n2/pdf/v1n2_hiltz.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. Kanfer, F. H. (1977). The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.)Behavioral self-management: Strategies, techniques, and outcomes (pp. 1–48). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  21. Karabenick, S. A. (1998).Strategic help seeking: Implications for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ley, K., & Young, D. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lincoln, E., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Loomis, K. D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1), 23–31. Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n1/pdf/v4n1_loomis.pdfGoogle Scholar
  26. Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003).Towards self-regulation in Web-based learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  29. Patton, M. A. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Pintrich. P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction.Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
  32. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing.Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
  33. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P. D. Pearson & Iran-Nejad (Eds).Review of research in education, 23 (pp 1–24). Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
  34. Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and selfregulated learning. In: B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, R. M. (1982).Learning how to learn. Chicago: Follett.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, R. M. (1990). The promise of learning to learn. In R. M. Smith & Associates (Eds.),Learning to learn across the life span (pp. 3–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Spooner, F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes.The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stake R. E. (1995)The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Styles, I., & Zariski, A. (2000). Enhancing student strategies for online learning. In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.),Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  40. Swan, K. (2002). Immediacy, social presence, and asynchronous discussion. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.),Elements of quality online education (Vol. 3). Olin & Babson Colleges: Sloan Center for Online Education.Google Scholar
  41. Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online course discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.)Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147–164). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  42. Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wegner, S. H., Holloway, K.C., & Garton, E. M. (1999). The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning.Journal of Asychncronous Learning Networks,3(2). Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v3n2/pdf/v3n2_wegner.pdf.Google Scholar
  44. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (1994).Case study research, design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, Ca: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.).Handbooik of self-regulation (pp. 749–768). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: What are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology 16, 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (p. 1–25). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Zimmerman, B. J. (1996).Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. The City University of New York: APA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. In M. Ferrari (Ed.).The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview assessing students' use of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan L. Whipp
    • 1
  • Stephannie Chiarelli
    • 2
  1. 1.the Department of Educational Policy and Leadership at Marquette UniversityMarquetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology at Marquette UniversityMarquetteUSA

Personalised recommendations